CPPC screen-1 held-out knockout cell-state proportions
Five-dimensional cell-state proportions, L1 error; six folds for 59 post-QC perturbations; methods repeated five times. Distinct from prospective selection and from transcriptome MSE.
No reviewed evaluations are linked here in this release. See the sources and separately identified configurations below.
Overview
Five-dimensional cell-state proportions, L1 error; six folds for 59 post-QC perturbations; methods repeated five times. Distinct from prospective selection and from transcriptome MSE.
Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.
Published results still to collect
This release has no source-checked evaluations linked to this page. It does not mean that the benchmark has no published results.
Charts will appear when compatible result tables have been checked against their sources.
Results
All evaluations
0 evaluations · 0 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
No evaluations linked in this release.
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d.
Methods and evaluation design
Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations
Evaluation design
Benchmarks bring together tasks and protocols. A task describes the biological question; a protocol defines a particular test.
These source-backed links do not make different protocols or scores interchangeable.
Baseline coverage
Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.
0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.
No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.
No reviewed evaluations with results linked in this release.
Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.
Null control
Proposed control: requires review
No-change prediction under matched control conditions
Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.
This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.
Conventional reference
Proposed control: requires review
Training-only mean-effect or linear prediction
Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.
This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.
Protocol coverage CSV · Model evaluation matrix · Source table · Release and checksums
Coverage is derived from release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.
Run instructions
No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions
Applicable tests and references
Applicability is distinct from a completed evaluation.
- Bagging predictor · source_supported
- Non-targeting-control state proportions · source_supported
- Kernel regression · source_supported
- Nearest-neighbor regression · source_supported
- Average training-perturbation state proportions · source_supported
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
3 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Relationship: part of ucc-research-benchmark-cppc Individual claims | Cancer Immunotherapy Data Science Challenge official code Challenge setup and results; Supplementary Table S2 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: 283328a9b8afc6e882eeb503ac4710bbe9f37371 | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-30T21:43:56Z Audit detailsPrimary-source table transcription and scope review; no independent reproduction or human scientific review. Field: Claim: ucc-research-membership-cppc-response Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Relationship: part of ucc-research-benchmark-cppc Individual claims | Cancer Immunotherapy Data Science Challenge Challenge setup and results; Supplementary Table S2 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: 10.64898/2026.05.21.726863v1; 2026 preprint | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-30T21:43:56Z Audit detailsPrimary-source table transcription and scope review; no independent reproduction or human scientific review. Field: Claim: ucc-research-membership-cppc-response Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Relationship: part of ucc-research-benchmark-cppc Individual claims | CPPC Table S2 original and reimplemented submission comparisons Challenge setup and results; Supplementary Table S2 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: Table S2 media-3.xlsx, 10.64898/2026.05.21.726863v1 | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-30T21:43:56Z Audit detailsPrimary-source table transcription and scope review; no independent reproduction or human scientific review. Field: Claim: ucc-research-membership-cppc-response Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record Archive member: media-3.xlsx |
Sources and history
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d · Record review: source checked
2 source records and release history
- Cancer Immunotherapy Data Science Challenge · Original source · 10.64898/2026.05.21.726863v1; 2026 preprint
- Cancer Immunotherapy Data Science Challenge official code · Original source · 283328a9b8afc6e882eeb503ac4710bbe9f37371
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: ucc-research-protocol-cppc-response
- review
- method: automated_source_review; actor: Codex research coverage worker; reviewed at: 2026-09-30T21:43:56Z; note: Primary-source table transcription and scope review; no independent reproduction or human scientific review.
Related records
- dataset: CPPC B16-OVA mouse melanoma T-cell perturbation screens
- part of: Cancer Immunotherapy Data Science Challenge
- applicable to: Bagging predictor
- applicable to: Non-targeting-control state proportions
- applicable to: Kernel regression
- applicable to: Nearest-neighbor regression
- applicable to: Average training-perturbation state proportions
- subject: Source membership: ucc-research-protocol-cppc-response