Jores 2021 promoter strength: maize-protoplasts
Predict reporter strength for original pooled-species held-out promoter population.
Overview
Predict reporter strength for original pooled-species held-out promoter population.
Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.
2 recorded evaluations, 2 metric rows. A comparison chart has not yet been validated for these results. The table retains the individual findings and their sources.
Results
Results are available, but no reviewed comparison panel is linked in this release.
All evaluations
2 evaluations · 2 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Filter evaluations
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: Jores maize-protoplasts cnn | Protocol: Jores 2021 promoter strength: maize-protoplasts Dataset subset: Jores 10% promoter holdout: maize-protoplasts | 0.67 pearson_r_squared dimensionless · higher Uncertainty: type: unreported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported Jores et al. 2021 plant core promoter models · Figure 8b, maize-protoplasts panel; p849 Computational models predict and improve promoter strength |
| Configuration: Jores maize-protoplasts gc-motif-linear | Protocol: Jores 2021 promoter strength: maize-protoplasts Dataset subset: Jores 10% promoter holdout: maize-protoplasts | 0.45 pearson_r_squared dimensionless · higher Uncertainty: type: unreported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceJores maize-protoplasts gc-motif-linear Not reported Aggregation: Not reported Jores et al. 2021 plant core promoter models · Figure 8a, maize-protoplasts panel; p849 Computational models predict and improve promoter strength |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d.
Methods and evaluation design
Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations
Evaluation design
Benchmarks bring together tasks and protocols. A task describes the biological question; a protocol defines a particular test.
Benchmarks
These source-backed links do not make different protocols or scores interchangeable.
Recorded evaluations
Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.
Baseline coverage
Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.
0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.
No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.
- Author-reported evaluations
- 2
Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.
Null control
Proposed control: requires review
Select a task-valid null control after reviewing inputs and metric
Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.
This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.
Conventional reference
Proposed control: requires review
Select an upstream conventional reference after reviewing the full protocol
Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.
This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.
Protocol coverage CSV · Model evaluation matrix · Source table · Release and checksums
Coverage is derived from release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.
Run instructions
No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions
Applicable tests and references
Applicability is distinct from a completed evaluation.
- GC and motif linear-regression baseline: maize-protoplasts · source_supported
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
1 evidence row matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Relationship: part of uc20260930-benchmark-jores-promoters Individual claims | Jores et al. 2021 plant core promoter models Figure 8a,b; Computational modelling of promoter strength Version: Nature Plants 7:842–855, 2021; author-hosted version of record | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-30T21:44:09.612264+00:00 Audit detailsField: Claim: uc20260930-protocol-parent-5e27f1b32dcb8c23 Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
Sources and history
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d · Record review: source checked
1 source records and release history
- Jores et al. 2021 plant core promoter models · Original source · Nature Plants 7:842–855, 2021; author-hosted version of record
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: uc20260930-jores-protocol-maize-protoplasts
- areas
- dna-genomes
- source locator
- Figure 8a,b; Computational modelling of promoter strength
- metric
- pearson_r_squared
- review
- method: automated_source_review; reviewer: Codex experimental-use-case curation; date: 2026-09-30; reviewed at: 2026-09-30T21:40:59.576893+00:00; scope: Primary-source transcription and catalogue applicability audit; not human scientific review or independent experimental reproduction.