rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Protocol

BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes

Offline replay of six CRISPR screens: each method selects 128 genes per round for 5 rounds and is scored on the fraction of that screen's hits it recovered.

120 evaluations · 240 results

Overview

Offline replay of six CRISPR screens: each method selects 128 genes per round for 5 rounds and is scored on the fraction of that screen's hits it recovered.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

120 recorded evaluations, 240 metric rows. A comparison chart has not yet been validated for these results. The table retains the individual findings and their sources.

View coverage and remaining gaps across all benchmarks

Results

Results are available, but no reviewed comparison panel is linked in this release.

All evaluations

120 evaluations · 240 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: Badge acquisition function on an MLP surrogate (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: Carnevale et al. 2022 screen, T-cell resistance to tumour-microenvironment inhibitory signals
0.044 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Badge on Carnev. (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Badge', column 'All' under 'Carnev.'
Configuration: Badge acquisition function on an MLP surrogate (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: Carnevale et al. 2022 screen, T-cell resistance to tumour-microenvironment inhibitory signals
0.036 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Badge on Carnev. (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Badge', column 'N/E' under 'Carnev.'
Configuration: Badge acquisition function on an MLP surrogate (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: CAR-T proliferation screen (unpublished dataset used by Roohani et al. 2025)
0.042 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Badge on CAR-T (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Badge', column 'All' under 'CAR-T'
Configuration: Badge acquisition function on an MLP surrogate (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: CAR-T proliferation screen (unpublished dataset used by Roohani et al. 2025)
0.038 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Badge on CAR-T (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Badge', column 'N/E' under 'CAR-T'
Configuration: Badge acquisition function on an MLP surrogate (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: Sanchez et al. 2021 screen, endogenous tau protein level in neurons
0.039 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Badge on Sanchez (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Badge', column 'All' under 'Sanchez'
Configuration: Badge acquisition function on an MLP surrogate (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: Sanchez et al. 2021 screen, endogenous tau protein level in neurons
0.035 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Badge on Sanchez (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Badge', column 'N/E' under 'Sanchez'
Configuration: Badge acquisition function on an MLP surrogate (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: Scharenberg et al. 2023 screen, lysosomal choline recycling in pancreatic cells
0.258 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Badge on Scharen. (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Badge', column 'All' under 'Scharen.'
Configuration: Badge acquisition function on an MLP surrogate (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: Scharenberg et al. 2023 screen, lysosomal choline recycling in pancreatic cells
0.211 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Badge on Scharen. (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Badge', column 'N/E' under 'Scharen.'
Configuration: Badge acquisition function on an MLP surrogate (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: Schmidt et al. 2022 screen, interferon-gamma production in primary human T cells
0.06 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Badge on Schmidt1 (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Badge', column 'All' under 'Schmidt1'
Configuration: Badge acquisition function on an MLP surrogate (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: Schmidt et al. 2022 screen, interferon-gamma production in primary human T cells
0.05 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Badge on Schmidt1 (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Badge', column 'N/E' under 'Schmidt1'
Configuration: Badge acquisition function on an MLP surrogate (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: Schmidt et al. 2022 screen, interleukin-2 production in primary human T cells
0.077 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Badge on Schmidt2 (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Badge', column 'All' under 'Schmidt2'
Configuration: Badge acquisition function on an MLP surrogate (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: Schmidt et al. 2022 screen, interleukin-2 production in primary human T cells
0.058 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Badge on Schmidt2 (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Badge', column 'N/E' under 'Schmidt2'
Configuration: BioDiscoveryAgent (No-Tools), Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: Carnevale et al. 2022 screen, T-cell resistance to tumour-microenvironment inhibitory signals
0.042 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Claude 3.5 Sonnet on Carnev. (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Claude 3.5 Sonnet', column 'All' under 'Carnev.'
Configuration: BioDiscoveryAgent (No-Tools), Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: Carnevale et al. 2022 screen, T-cell resistance to tumour-microenvironment inhibitory signals
0.044 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Claude 3.5 Sonnet on Carnev. (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Claude 3.5 Sonnet', column 'N/E' under 'Carnev.'
Configuration: BioDiscoveryAgent (No-Tools), Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: CAR-T proliferation screen (unpublished dataset used by Roohani et al. 2025)
0.13 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Claude 3.5 Sonnet on CAR-T (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Claude 3.5 Sonnet', column 'All' under 'CAR-T'
Configuration: BioDiscoveryAgent (No-Tools), Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: CAR-T proliferation screen (unpublished dataset used by Roohani et al. 2025)
0.133 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Claude 3.5 Sonnet on CAR-T (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Claude 3.5 Sonnet', column 'N/E' under 'CAR-T'
Configuration: BioDiscoveryAgent (No-Tools), Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: Sanchez et al. 2021 screen, endogenous tau protein level in neurons
0.066 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Claude 3.5 Sonnet on Sanchez (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Claude 3.5 Sonnet', column 'All' under 'Sanchez'
Configuration: BioDiscoveryAgent (No-Tools), Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: Sanchez et al. 2021 screen, endogenous tau protein level in neurons
0.063 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Claude 3.5 Sonnet on Sanchez (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Claude 3.5 Sonnet', column 'N/E' under 'Sanchez'
Configuration: BioDiscoveryAgent (No-Tools), Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: Scharenberg et al. 2023 screen, lysosomal choline recycling in pancreatic cells
0.326 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Claude 3.5 Sonnet on Scharen. (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Claude 3.5 Sonnet', column 'All' under 'Scharen.'
Configuration: BioDiscoveryAgent (No-Tools), Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: Scharenberg et al. 2023 screen, lysosomal choline recycling in pancreatic cells
0.292 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Claude 3.5 Sonnet on Scharen. (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Claude 3.5 Sonnet', column 'N/E' under 'Scharen.'
Configuration: BioDiscoveryAgent (No-Tools), Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: Schmidt et al. 2022 screen, interferon-gamma production in primary human T cells
0.095 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Claude 3.5 Sonnet on Schmidt1 (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Claude 3.5 Sonnet', column 'All' under 'Schmidt1'
Configuration: BioDiscoveryAgent (No-Tools), Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: Schmidt et al. 2022 screen, interferon-gamma production in primary human T cells
0.107 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Claude 3.5 Sonnet on Schmidt1 (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Claude 3.5 Sonnet', column 'N/E' under 'Schmidt1'
Configuration: BioDiscoveryAgent (No-Tools), Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: Schmidt et al. 2022 screen, interleukin-2 production in primary human T cells
0.104 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Claude 3.5 Sonnet on Schmidt2 (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Claude 3.5 Sonnet', column 'All' under 'Schmidt2'
Configuration: BioDiscoveryAgent (No-Tools), Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: Schmidt et al. 2022 screen, interleukin-2 production in primary human T cells
0.122 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Claude 3.5 Sonnet on Schmidt2 (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Claude 3.5 Sonnet', column 'N/E' under 'Schmidt2'
Configuration: BioDiscoveryAgent (No-Tools), Claude 3 Haiku (Roohani et al. 2025)Protocol: BioDiscoveryAgent 1-gene perturbation design: hit ratio after 5 rounds of 128 genes
Dataset: Carnevale et al. 2022 screen, T-cell resistance to tumour-microenvironment inhibitory signals
0.032 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted: Appendix Table 7 prints one standard deviation over 10 runs for these values; not extracted in this pass.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Claude 3 Haiku on Carnev. (Roohani et al. 2025)

tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

Aggregation: Not reported

BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments · Table 1, row 'Claude 3 Haiku', column 'All' under 'Carnev.'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-10-7fcc3e48a123.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Explore all linked results

Baseline coverage

Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.

0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.

No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.

Author-reported evaluations
72
External evaluations
48

Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.

Null control

Proposed control: requires review

No-change prediction under matched control conditions

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Conventional reference

Proposed control: requires review

Training-only mean-effect or linear prediction

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Protocol coverage CSV (gzip) · Model evaluation matrix (gzip) · Source table (gzip) · Release and checksums (gzip)

Coverage is derived from release 2026-10-10-7fcc3e48a123. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-10-7fcc3e48a123
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-10-7fcc3e48a123 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: tgtval-20261009-protocol-roohani2025-hitratio-round5

areas
cells-tissues
contexts
research
protocol
At each of 5 rounds a method selects 128 genes (32 for Scharenberg et al. 2023, whose pool is 1,061 perturbations); the measured phenotypic response of each selected gene is then revealed from the screen. Score: hit ratio after round 5, the fraction of the screen's true hits that were selected in any round, averaged over 10 runs. Reported twice per screen: over all genes, and over non-essential genes only.
version
Roohani et al. 2025 (ICLR 2025) sections 2 and 4; Table 1
metric
recall
metric direction
higher
unit
fraction
metric definition
Hit ratio = |genes selected in rounds 1..5 whose response exceeds the threshold tau| / |all genes in the screen whose response exceeds tau|. This is recall over the screen's hit set. Non-hits are genes the screen assayed whose response did not exceed tau; genes the screen did not assay are not in the pool.
selection
Candidate pool is the genes assayed by each screen (over 18,000 per screen; 1,061 for Scharenberg et al. 2023)
limitations
Offline replay of six existing screens: the candidate pool is the genes each screen assayed, so untested genes are absent rather than negative.; Hit ratio measures recovery of that screen's own hits, not whether a target is useful.; Hits are defined by a threshold tau on the screen's phenotypic response; the source does not print tau or the hit count per screen.; All rows were run by the agent's developers. Two authors (Steinhart, Marson) are authors of the Schmidt et al. 2022 screens, the CAR-T screen is unpublished, and the conflicts statement says patent applications have been filed on the findings.; Gupta et al. 2025 report that the same agent performs about the same when its experimental feedback is replaced by randomly permuted outcomes: in their Table 1 the permuted variant scores at least as high on three of five screens with each of three backbones. These numbers should not be read as evidence that the agent learns from each round's results.
source locator
Sections 2 and 4.1; Table 1 and its caption; appendix Table 7 (error intervals)
Related records

Suggest a correction