Protocol

CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2)

Per-caller recall, precision and F1 for somatic indels on one WGS tumour-normal pair.

Overview

Per-caller recall, precision and F1 for somatic indels on one WGS tumour-normal pair.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

12 recorded evaluations, 48 metric rows. A comparison chart has not yet been validated for these results. The table retains the individual findings and their sources.

View coverage and remaining gaps across all benchmarks

Results

Results are available, but no reviewed comparison panel is linked in this release.

All evaluations

12 evaluations · 48 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Tested model or methodProtocolDatasetEvaluation setupMetricEvidence origin

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configuration	Protocol and dataset	Finding	Evidence and details
Configuration: LoFreq v2.1.3.1 (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	758 count count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source LoFreq on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', D30; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'LoFreq'; column 'Count'
Configuration: LoFreq v2.1.3.1 (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	0.126 f1-score fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source LoFreq on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', G30; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'LoFreq'; column 'F1'
Configuration: LoFreq v2.1.3.1 (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	0.0739 precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source LoFreq on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', F30; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'LoFreq'; column 'Precision'
Configuration: LoFreq v2.1.3.1 (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	0.418 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source LoFreq on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', E30; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'LoFreq'; column 'Recall'
Configuration: MuTect2 (GATK v3.7-0) (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	267 count count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source MuTect2 on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', D33; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'MuTect2'; column 'Count'
Configuration: MuTect2 (GATK v3.7-0) (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	0.279 f1-score fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source MuTect2 on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', G33; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'MuTect2'; column 'F1'
Configuration: MuTect2 (GATK v3.7-0) (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	0.21 precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source MuTect2 on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', F33; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'MuTect2'; column 'Precision'
Configuration: MuTect2 (GATK v3.7-0) (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	0.418 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source MuTect2 on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', E33; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'MuTect2'; column 'Recall'
Configuration: NeuSomatic v0.2.1 ensemble mode, DREAM3 model, all calls (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	444 count count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source NeuSomatic_Lowqual on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', D39; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'NeuSomatic_Lowqual'; column 'Count'
Configuration: NeuSomatic v0.2.1 ensemble mode, DREAM3 model, all calls (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	0.159 f1-score fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source NeuSomatic_Lowqual on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', G39; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'NeuSomatic_Lowqual'; column 'F1'
Configuration: NeuSomatic v0.2.1 ensemble mode, DREAM3 model, all calls (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	0.104 precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source NeuSomatic_Lowqual on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', F39; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'NeuSomatic_Lowqual'; column 'Precision'
Configuration: NeuSomatic v0.2.1 ensemble mode, DREAM3 model, all calls (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	0.343 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source NeuSomatic_Lowqual on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', E39; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'NeuSomatic_Lowqual'; column 'Recall'
Configuration: NeuSomatic v0.2.1 ensemble mode, DREAM3 model, PASS calls (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	243 count count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source NeuSomatic_Pass on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', D38; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'NeuSomatic_Pass'; column 'Count'
Configuration: NeuSomatic v0.2.1 ensemble mode, DREAM3 model, PASS calls (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	0.228 f1-score fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source NeuSomatic_Pass on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', G38; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'NeuSomatic_Pass'; column 'F1'
Configuration: NeuSomatic v0.2.1 ensemble mode, DREAM3 model, PASS calls (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	0.177 precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source NeuSomatic_Pass on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', F38; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'NeuSomatic_Pass'; column 'Precision'
Configuration: NeuSomatic v0.2.1 ensemble mode, DREAM3 model, PASS calls (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	0.321 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source NeuSomatic_Pass on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', E38; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'NeuSomatic_Pass'; column 'Recall'
Configuration: Strelka v2.7.1 (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	527 count count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Strelka on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', D31; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'Strelka'; column 'Count'
Configuration: Strelka v2.7.1 (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	0.275 f1-score fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Strelka on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', G31; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'Strelka'; column 'F1'
Configuration: Strelka v2.7.1 (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	0.173 precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Strelka on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', F31; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'Strelka'; column 'Precision'
Configuration: Strelka v2.7.1 (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	0.679 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Strelka on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', E31; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'Strelka'; column 'Recall'
Configuration: VarDict through bcbio-nextgen v1.1.5 (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	3250 count count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source VarDict (bcbio) on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', D28; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'VarDict (bcbio)'; column 'Count'
Configuration: VarDict through bcbio-nextgen v1.1.5 (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	0.039 f1-score fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source VarDict (bcbio) on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', G28; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'VarDict (bcbio)'; column 'F1'
Configuration: VarDict through bcbio-nextgen v1.1.5 (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	0.0203 precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source VarDict (bcbio) on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', F28; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'VarDict (bcbio)'; column 'Precision'
Configuration: VarDict through bcbio-nextgen v1.1.5 (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	0.493 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source VarDict (bcbio) on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', E28; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'VarDict (bcbio)'; column 'Recall'
Configuration: VarDict v1.6.0 standalone (Wang et al. 2020)	Protocol: CLL tumour somatic indels, WGS (Wang et al. 2020 Table S2) Dataset: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls	25300 count count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source VarDict (standalone) on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020) somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel Aggregation: Not reported SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach; Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', D29; dataset 'CLL'; caller 'VarDict (standalone)'; column 'Count'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-09-ba02f2f4a36e.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Baseline coverage

Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.

0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.

No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.

Author-reported evaluations: 4
External evaluations: 8

Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.

Null control

Proposed control: requires review

Select a task-valid null control after reviewing inputs and metric

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Conventional reference

Proposed control: requires review

Select an upstream conventional reference after reviewing the full protocol

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Protocol coverage CSV (gzip) · Model evaluation matrix (gzip) · Source table (gzip) · Release and checksums (gzip)

Coverage is derived from release 2026-10-09-ba02f2f4a36e. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-09-ba02f2f4a36e
Property and statement	Original source and location	Review and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

All evidence (JSONL) (gzip)How to read the evidence

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-09-ba02f2f4a36e · Record review: source checked

2 source records and release history

SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach · Original source · Scientific Reports 10:12898, published 2020-07-30; PMC7393490 full-text XML
Wang et al. 2020, Supplementary Tables (somatic caller performance) · Original source · 41598_2020_69772_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (Supplementary Tables S1-S9) as served by the publisher

Download this release (gzip)

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: somatic-20261009-protocol-wang2020-cll-indel

areas: dna-genomes
contexts: clinical_research
protocol: Callers run on the tumour-normal pair with default settings or author instructions; calls compared with the truth set by the DREAM challenge evaluator.py. Recall = detected true variants / true variants; precision = detected true variants / all calls.
version: Supplementary S2 WGS INDELs, dataset 'CLL'
metric implementation: evaluator.py from Sage-Bionetworks/ICGC-TCGA-DREAM-Mutation-Calling-challenge-tools (commit not stated)
denominator: 134
limitations: Single tumour-normal pair; no replicate or interval estimates.; Curated truth set of unclear completeness, especially at low VAF (Results 'Datasets for evaluation'); calls missing from the truth set count as false positives, so precision is a lower bound.; The source study treated calls below 2% VAF as unreliable, so the truth set lacks low-VAF variants (Discussion paragraph 5).; Caller versions are those listed in Methods (for example MuTect2 from GATK v3.7-0, Strelka v2.7.1); later releases may behave differently.
source locator: Supplementary Tables workbook sheet 'S2 WGS INDELs', rows for dataset 'CLL'; Methods 'Variant calling comparisons'

Related records

uses data: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia tumour-normal WGS with curated somatic calls
assessment: LoFreq on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020)
assessment: MuTect2 on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020)
assessment: NeuSomatic_Lowqual on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020)
assessment: NeuSomatic_Pass on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020)
assessment: Strelka on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020)
assessment: VarDict (bcbio) on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020)
assessment: VarDict (standalone) on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020)
assessment: VarScan on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020)
assessment: 3callers (>=1) on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020)
assessment: 3callers (>=2) on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020)
assessment: 5callers (>=2) on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020)
assessment: 5callers (>=3) on CLL indels (Wang et al. 2020)
assessed by: Select a tumour DNA somatic variant-calling workflow

Suggest a correction