rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Protocol

Splice-altering variant classification, Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3) (Fortier et al. Table 2)

Binary splice-altering classification on the Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3), scored by sensitivity, specificity, F1 and balanced accuracy.

4 evaluations · 16 results

Overview

An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

4 recorded evaluations, 16 metric rows. A comparison chart has not yet been validated for these results. The table retains the individual findings and their sources.

View coverage and remaining gaps across all benchmarks

Results

Results are available, but no reviewed comparison panel is linked in this release.

All evaluations

4 evaluations · 16 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3) (Fortier et al. Table 2) · Dataset: Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)

Sorted by Balanced accuracy (delta score for each variant's effect type; threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound)) (higher is better). The best value in each column is highlighted. Decimals are rounded for display; each value links to the printed value and its source.

Tested configurationBalanced accuracy (delta score for each variant's effect type; threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound))F1 (delta score for each variant's effect type; threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound))Recall (delta score for each variant's effect type; threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound))Specificity (delta score for each variant's effect type; threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound))Balanced accuracy (threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound))F1 (threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound))Recall (threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound))Specificity (threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound))
SpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Evaluation0.836 (best in column)0.839 (best in column)0.79 (best in column)0.883 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
CI-SpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Evaluation0.7940.7850.7060.883 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
OpenSpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Evaluation0.7460.7410.6720.819Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Legacy Ensemble (Fortier et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.6590.6090.50.817
All 16 result rows with coverage, uncertainty and sources
Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: CI-SpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3) (Fortier et al. Table 2)
Dataset: Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)
0.794 Balanced accuracy (delta score for each variant's effect type; threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CI-SpliceAI on the Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-riepe

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 2, row 'CI-SpliceAI', column 'Balanced Accuracy'
Configuration: CI-SpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3) (Fortier et al. Table 2)
Dataset: Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)
0.785 F1 (delta score for each variant's effect type; threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CI-SpliceAI on the Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-riepe

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 2, row 'CI-SpliceAI', column 'F1'
Configuration: CI-SpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3) (Fortier et al. Table 2)
Dataset: Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)
0.706 Recall (delta score for each variant's effect type; threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CI-SpliceAI on the Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-riepe

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 2, row 'CI-SpliceAI', column 'Sensitivity'
Configuration: CI-SpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3) (Fortier et al. Table 2)
Dataset: Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)
0.883 Specificity (delta score for each variant's effect type; threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CI-SpliceAI on the Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-riepe

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 2, row 'CI-SpliceAI', column 'Specificity'
Configuration: Legacy Ensemble (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3) (Fortier et al. Table 2)
Dataset: Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)
0.659 Balanced accuracy (threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Legacy Ensemble on the Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-riepe

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 2, row 'Legacy Ensemble', column 'Balanced Accuracy'
Configuration: Legacy Ensemble (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3) (Fortier et al. Table 2)
Dataset: Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)
0.609 F1 (threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Legacy Ensemble on the Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-riepe

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 2, row 'Legacy Ensemble', column 'F1'
Configuration: Legacy Ensemble (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3) (Fortier et al. Table 2)
Dataset: Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)
0.5 Recall (threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Legacy Ensemble on the Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-riepe

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 2, row 'Legacy Ensemble', column 'Sensitivity'
Configuration: Legacy Ensemble (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3) (Fortier et al. Table 2)
Dataset: Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)
0.817 Specificity (threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Legacy Ensemble on the Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-riepe

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 2, row 'Legacy Ensemble', column 'Specificity'
Configuration: OpenSpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3) (Fortier et al. Table 2)
Dataset: Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)
0.746 Balanced accuracy (delta score for each variant's effect type; threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenSpliceAI on the Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-riepe

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 2, row 'OpenSpliceAI', column 'Balanced Accuracy'
Configuration: OpenSpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3) (Fortier et al. Table 2)
Dataset: Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)
0.741 F1 (delta score for each variant's effect type; threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenSpliceAI on the Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-riepe

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 2, row 'OpenSpliceAI', column 'F1'
Configuration: OpenSpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3) (Fortier et al. Table 2)
Dataset: Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)
0.672 Recall (delta score for each variant's effect type; threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenSpliceAI on the Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-riepe

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 2, row 'OpenSpliceAI', column 'Sensitivity'
Configuration: OpenSpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3) (Fortier et al. Table 2)
Dataset: Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)
0.819 Specificity (delta score for each variant's effect type; threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenSpliceAI on the Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-riepe

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 2, row 'OpenSpliceAI', column 'Specificity'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3) (Fortier et al. Table 2)
Dataset: Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)
0.836 Balanced accuracy (delta score for each variant's effect type; threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on the Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-riepe

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 2, row 'SpliceAI', column 'Balanced Accuracy'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3) (Fortier et al. Table 2)
Dataset: Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)
0.839 F1 (delta score for each variant's effect type; threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on the Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-riepe

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 2, row 'SpliceAI', column 'F1'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3) (Fortier et al. Table 2)
Dataset: Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)
0.79 Recall (delta score for each variant's effect type; threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on the Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-riepe

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 2, row 'SpliceAI', column 'Sensitivity'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3) (Fortier et al. Table 2)
Dataset: Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)
0.883 Specificity (delta score for each variant's effect type; threshold optimised per gene and algorithm for maximum accuracy (upper bound))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on the Riepe et al. functional splice assay variants (213 variants, ABCA4 and MYBPC3)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-riepe

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 2, row 'SpliceAI', column 'Specificity'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Baseline coverage

Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.

0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.

No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.

Author-reported evaluations
1
External evaluations
3

Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.

Null control

Proposed control: requires review

Training-set class prior where supervised fitting is permitted

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Conventional reference

Proposed control: requires review

Regularised classifier on simple permitted features, or protocol's conventional reference

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Protocol coverage CSV (gzip) · Model evaluation matrix (gzip) · Source table (gzip) · Release and checksums (gzip)

Coverage is derived from release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-riepe

areas
dna-genomes
contexts
clinical_research
protocol
The delta score matching each variant's effect type is used; thresholds are optimised per gene and algorithm for the highest accuracy (an upper-bound estimate); Legacy Ensemble vote N > 1, and N > 2 for ABCA4.
version
Table 2
source locator
Methods 'Riepe benchmark dataset' and 'Splice prediction tools'; Table 2
limitations
Thresholds optimised on the same data for this benchmark, which may overestimate real-world performance (Discussion 'Study limitations').; Labels and variant sets are reused from earlier publications. CI-SpliceAI was trained on all human chromosomes, so no benchmark variant is held out from its training; ABCA4 lies on a test chromosome held out by both SpliceAI and OpenSpliceAI (Methods 'Technical overview of deep learning methods'; Discussion).; No uncertainty intervals are printed; significance is from two-proportion Z-tests on accuracy in the Results.
Related records

Suggest a correction