Published comparison; transcribed, not reproduced.
These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation. A source-checked score alone does not meet these requirements.
Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc · Evidence verified: Not verified
Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.
No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.
1 evaluation · 11 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: CADD (Riepe et al. 2021) | Protocol: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 4) Dataset: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set) | 59% accuracy percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCADD on ABCA4 deep-intronic variants splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-di Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 4 row 'CADD', column 'Accuracy (%)' |
| Configuration: CADD (Riepe et al. 2021) | Protocol: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 4) Dataset: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set) | 9 false-negative-count count · lower Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCADD on ABCA4 deep-intronic variants splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-di Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 4 row 'CADD', column 'FN' |
| Configuration: CADD (Riepe et al. 2021) | Protocol: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 4) Dataset: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set) | 24 false-positive-count count · lower Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCADD on ABCA4 deep-intronic variants splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-di Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 4 row 'CADD', column 'FP' |
| Configuration: CADD (Riepe et al. 2021) | Protocol: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 4) Dataset: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set) | 0.15 matthews-correlation-coefficient unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCADD on ABCA4 deep-intronic variants splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-di Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 4 row 'CADD', column 'MCC' |
| Configuration: CADD (Riepe et al. 2021) | Protocol: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 4) Dataset: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set) | 0 count count · lower Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCADD on ABCA4 deep-intronic variants splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-di Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 4 row 'CADD', column 'Missing values' |
| Configuration: CADD (Riepe et al. 2021) | Protocol: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 4) Dataset: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set) | 80% negative-predictive-value percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCADD on ABCA4 deep-intronic variants splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-di Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 4 row 'CADD', column 'NPV (%)' |
| Configuration: CADD (Riepe et al. 2021) | Protocol: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 4) Dataset: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set) | 33% precision percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCADD on ABCA4 deep-intronic variants splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-di Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 4 row 'CADD', column 'PPV (%)' |
| Configuration: CADD (Riepe et al. 2021) | Protocol: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 4) Dataset: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set) | 57% recall percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCADD on ABCA4 deep-intronic variants splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-di Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 4 row 'CADD', column 'Sensitivity (%)' |
| Configuration: CADD (Riepe et al. 2021) | Protocol: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 4) Dataset: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set) | 60% specificity percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCADD on ABCA4 deep-intronic variants splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-di Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 4 row 'CADD', column 'Specificity (%)' |
| Configuration: CADD (Riepe et al. 2021) | Protocol: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 4) Dataset: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set) | 36 true-negative-count count · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCADD on ABCA4 deep-intronic variants splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-di Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 4 row 'CADD', column 'TN' |
| Configuration: CADD (Riepe et al. 2021) | Protocol: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 4) Dataset: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set) | 12 true-positive-count count · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCADD on ABCA4 deep-intronic variants splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-di Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 4 row 'CADD', column 'TP' |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc.
splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-di
Metadata review: source checked. Unreported conditions prevent automatic comparisons.
No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.
Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
18 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| attributes.comparison.adaptation Per-data-set cutoff Context-only references | Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays Table 4 row 'CADD' Version: Human Mutation 42(7):799, published online 2021-05-20; PMC8360004 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded independent paper Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.comparison.aggregation Pooled over the data set Context-only references | Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays Table 4 row 'CADD' Version: Human Mutation 42(7):799, published online 2021-05-20; PMC8360004 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded independent paper Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.comparison.budget Not reported Context-only references | Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays Table 4 row 'CADD' Version: Human Mutation 42(7):799, published online 2021-05-20; PMC8360004 full-text XML | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded independent paper Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.comparison.dataset_version Riepe et al. Table S1 (as published) Context-only references | Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays Table 4 row 'CADD' Version: Human Mutation 42(7):799, published online 2021-05-20; PMC8360004 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded independent paper Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.comparison.inputs Variant (GRCh37) as VCF, FASTA window or Alamut session, per tool Context-only references | Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays Table 4 row 'CADD' Version: Human Mutation 42(7):799, published online 2021-05-20; PMC8360004 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded independent paper Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.comparison.metric_implementation Not reported Context-only references | Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays Table 4 row 'CADD' Version: Human Mutation 42(7):799, published online 2021-05-20; PMC8360004 full-text XML | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded independent paper Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.comparison.population 81 variants Context-only references | Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays Table 4 row 'CADD' Version: Human Mutation 42(7):799, published online 2021-05-20; PMC8360004 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded independent paper Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.comparison.protocol_id splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-di Context-only references | Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays Table 4 row 'CADD' Version: Human Mutation 42(7):799, published online 2021-05-20; PMC8360004 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded independent paper Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.comparison.split No split Context-only references | Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays Table 4 row 'CADD' Version: Human Mutation 42(7):799, published online 2021-05-20; PMC8360004 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded independent paper Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.origin independent_paper Context-only references | Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays Table 4 row 'CADD' Version: Human Mutation 42(7):799, published online 2021-05-20; PMC8360004 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded independent paper Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc · Record review: source checked
Stable ID: splicing-follow-up-20261009-eval-riepe2021-abca4-di-cadd-1-6