rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Evaluation

NT 2.5B 4-bit inference memory

Published result; transcribed, not reproduced.

Evaluation results

1 evaluation · 1 result. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: NT 2.5B, 4-bit weights for embedding inference (Saadat and Fellay 2026)Protocol: Peak memory under 8-bit and 4-bit quantization relative to BF16 (Saadat and Fellay 2026 Figure 5)
Dataset: Synthetic uniform random DNA sequences, seed 42 (Saadat and Fellay 2026)
5.6 Peak memory (Embedding inference with 4-bit weights; the paper calls it parameter memory in Section 2.4 and peak memory in Figure 5)
gigabyte · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

NT 2.5B 4-bit inference memory

saadat-fellay-20261015-protocol-quantization-peak-memory

Aggregation: Not reported

Optimizing genomic language models for efficient training, fine-tuning, and inference (Saadat and Fellay, ICLR 2026 workshop) · Section 3.5 'Memory' paragraph (page 7): 'For NT 2.5B, memory decreases from 6.7 GB (BF16) to 5.6 GB (4-bit).'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.

Research readiness

0 of 4 readiness checks met. These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation; a source-checked score alone does not meet them.

Readiness checks, gaps and artifacts

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Evidence verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Replay metrics

Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • Metrics are recomputed from the saved predictions: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Investigate discrepancies

Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • Metrics are recomputed from the saved predictions: not yet verified
  • Sample annotations are recorded: not yet verified
  • Dependence between samples is assessed: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Run locally

A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • A pinned run recipe exists: not yet verified
  • Compute requirements are estimated: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Validate independently

Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • Independent validation data exist: not yet verified
  • Overlap with training data is checked: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.

Artifacts and reproduction

No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.

Evaluation procedure

Peak memory under 8-bit and 4-bit quantization relative to BF16 (Saadat and Fellay 2026 Figure 5)

Configuration
NT 2.5B, 4-bit weights for embedding inference (Saadat and Fellay 2026)
Protocol
Peak memory under 8-bit and 4-bit quantization relative to BF16 (Saadat and Fellay 2026 Figure 5)
Dataset
Synthetic uniform random DNA sequences, seed 42 (Saadat and Fellay 2026)
origin
Independent external evaluation
configuration
Primary source as retrieved 2026-10-15
split
Not applicable
population
Not reported
inputs
DNA sequence
adaptation
None (pretrained weights)
aggregation
Not reported
budget
Not reported
protocol id
saadat-fellay-20261015-protocol-quantization-peak-memory
dataset version
Not reported
metric implementation
Not reported

Metadata review: source checked. Unreported conditions prevent automatic comparisons.

Reproduction

Split
Not applicable
Adaptation
None (pretrained weights)
Scoring implementation
Not reported

No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.

Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

19 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Comparison: adaptation
None (pretrained weights)
Context-only references
Optimizing genomic language models for efficient training, fine-tuning, and inference (Saadat and Fellay, ICLR 2026 workshop)

Original source ↗

Section 3.5 'Memory' paragraph (page 7); Figure 5 right panel

Version: OpenReview PDF headed 'Published as a workshop paper at ICLR 2026' (11 pages; PDF CreationDate 2026-03-09)
Retrieved: 2026-10-15T10:56:26Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.adaptation

Source artifact SHA-256: 4bc2452110f280a7ba8baa4c7c28beac89769511019666bc77fc33af9b3bcd60

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: aggregation
Not reported
Context-only references
Optimizing genomic language models for efficient training, fine-tuning, and inference (Saadat and Fellay, ICLR 2026 workshop)

Original source ↗

Section 3.5 'Memory' paragraph (page 7); Figure 5 right panel

Version: OpenReview PDF headed 'Published as a workshop paper at ICLR 2026' (11 pages; PDF CreationDate 2026-03-09)
Retrieved: 2026-10-15T10:56:26Z

missing or unspecified

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.aggregation

Source artifact SHA-256: 4bc2452110f280a7ba8baa4c7c28beac89769511019666bc77fc33af9b3bcd60

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: budget
Not reported
Context-only references
Optimizing genomic language models for efficient training, fine-tuning, and inference (Saadat and Fellay, ICLR 2026 workshop)

Original source ↗

Section 3.5 'Memory' paragraph (page 7); Figure 5 right panel

Version: OpenReview PDF headed 'Published as a workshop paper at ICLR 2026' (11 pages; PDF CreationDate 2026-03-09)
Retrieved: 2026-10-15T10:56:26Z

missing or unspecified

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.budget

Source artifact SHA-256: 4bc2452110f280a7ba8baa4c7c28beac89769511019666bc77fc33af9b3bcd60

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: dataset version
Not reported
Context-only references
Optimizing genomic language models for efficient training, fine-tuning, and inference (Saadat and Fellay, ICLR 2026 workshop)

Original source ↗

Section 3.5 'Memory' paragraph (page 7); Figure 5 right panel

Version: OpenReview PDF headed 'Published as a workshop paper at ICLR 2026' (11 pages; PDF CreationDate 2026-03-09)
Retrieved: 2026-10-15T10:56:26Z

missing or unspecified

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.dataset_version

Source artifact SHA-256: 4bc2452110f280a7ba8baa4c7c28beac89769511019666bc77fc33af9b3bcd60

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: inputs
DNA sequence
Context-only references
Optimizing genomic language models for efficient training, fine-tuning, and inference (Saadat and Fellay, ICLR 2026 workshop)

Original source ↗

Section 3.5 'Memory' paragraph (page 7); Figure 5 right panel

Version: OpenReview PDF headed 'Published as a workshop paper at ICLR 2026' (11 pages; PDF CreationDate 2026-03-09)
Retrieved: 2026-10-15T10:56:26Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.inputs

Source artifact SHA-256: 4bc2452110f280a7ba8baa4c7c28beac89769511019666bc77fc33af9b3bcd60

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: metric implementation
Not reported
Context-only references
Optimizing genomic language models for efficient training, fine-tuning, and inference (Saadat and Fellay, ICLR 2026 workshop)

Original source ↗

Section 3.5 'Memory' paragraph (page 7); Figure 5 right panel

Version: OpenReview PDF headed 'Published as a workshop paper at ICLR 2026' (11 pages; PDF CreationDate 2026-03-09)
Retrieved: 2026-10-15T10:56:26Z

missing or unspecified

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.metric_implementation

Source artifact SHA-256: 4bc2452110f280a7ba8baa4c7c28beac89769511019666bc77fc33af9b3bcd60

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: population
Not reported
Context-only references
Optimizing genomic language models for efficient training, fine-tuning, and inference (Saadat and Fellay, ICLR 2026 workshop)

Original source ↗

Section 3.5 'Memory' paragraph (page 7); Figure 5 right panel

Version: OpenReview PDF headed 'Published as a workshop paper at ICLR 2026' (11 pages; PDF CreationDate 2026-03-09)
Retrieved: 2026-10-15T10:56:26Z

missing or unspecified

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.population

Source artifact SHA-256: 4bc2452110f280a7ba8baa4c7c28beac89769511019666bc77fc33af9b3bcd60

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: protocol id
saadat-fellay-20261015-protocol-quantization-peak-memory
Context-only references
Optimizing genomic language models for efficient training, fine-tuning, and inference (Saadat and Fellay, ICLR 2026 workshop)

Original source ↗

Section 3.5 'Memory' paragraph (page 7); Figure 5 right panel

Version: OpenReview PDF headed 'Published as a workshop paper at ICLR 2026' (11 pages; PDF CreationDate 2026-03-09)
Retrieved: 2026-10-15T10:56:26Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.protocol_id

Source artifact SHA-256: 4bc2452110f280a7ba8baa4c7c28beac89769511019666bc77fc33af9b3bcd60

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: split
Not applicable
Context-only references
Optimizing genomic language models for efficient training, fine-tuning, and inference (Saadat and Fellay, ICLR 2026 workshop)

Original source ↗

Section 3.5 'Memory' paragraph (page 7); Figure 5 right panel

Version: OpenReview PDF headed 'Published as a workshop paper at ICLR 2026' (11 pages; PDF CreationDate 2026-03-09)
Retrieved: 2026-10-15T10:56:26Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.split

Source artifact SHA-256: 4bc2452110f280a7ba8baa4c7c28beac89769511019666bc77fc33af9b3bcd60

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Inference hardware
NVIDIA H100 (section 2.4); 'H100 94GB GPUs' (section 4)
Context-only references
Optimizing genomic language models for efficient training, fine-tuning, and inference (Saadat and Fellay, ICLR 2026 workshop)

Original source ↗

Section 3.5 'Memory' paragraph (page 7); Figure 5 right panel

Version: OpenReview PDF headed 'Published as a workshop paper at ICLR 2026' (11 pages; PDF CreationDate 2026-03-09)
Retrieved: 2026-10-15T10:56:26Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Audit details

Field: attributes.inference_hardware

Source artifact SHA-256: 4bc2452110f280a7ba8baa4c7c28beac89769511019666bc77fc33af9b3bcd60

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

How to read the evidence

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: saadat-fellay-20261015-eval-nt-2-5b-quantization-memory-4bit

areas
dna-genomes
contexts
research
origin
independent_paper
protocol
saadat-fellay-20261015-protocol-quantization-peak-memory
version
Primary source as retrieved 2026-10-15
comparison
split: Not applicable; population: Not reported; inputs: DNA sequence; adaptation: None (pretrained weights); aggregation: Not reported; budget: Not reported; protocol id: saadat-fellay-20261015-protocol-quantization-peak-memory; dataset version: Not reported; metric implementation: Not reported
source locator
Section 3.5 'Memory' paragraph (page 7); Figure 5 right panel
inference hardware
NVIDIA H100 (section 2.4); 'H100 94GB GPUs' (section 4)
missing metadata
comparison.aggregation: reason: unreported; comparison.budget: reason: unreported; comparison.dataset version: reason: unreported; comparison.metric implementation: reason: unreported; note: No code release is cited; comparison.population: reason: unreported; note: Input sequences, length and batch size are not stated for Figure 5
review
reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Claude review agent; no human review claimed. Independent Claude (Opus 5.5) review agent, separate from the extraction agent that built this batch. Automated review only. Transcription, not reproduction.; reviewed at: 2026-10-15T22:00:00Z; artifact sha256: 4bc2452110f280a7ba8baa4c7c28beac89769511019666bc77fc33af9b3bcd60; retrieval url: https://openreview.net/pdf?id=NUleWh1GFx; method: source-hash-verification; pdf-text-parse; scope-review; method note: Links, origin, comparison fields and missing-metadata reasons checked against the PDF and the linked protocol.; note: Origin independent_paper checked: the authors (EPFL) are not among the GENA-LM (Fishman et al.) or Nucleotide Transformer (Dalla-Torre et al.) authors and cite both as other work.
Related records

Suggest a correction