Developer-reported comparison transcribed from the pinned source; not reproduced.
1 evaluation · 1 result. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.
0 of 4 readiness checks met. These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation; a source-checked score alone does not meet them.
Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Evidence verified: Not verified
Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.
No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.
Metadata review: source checked. Unreported conditions prevent automatic comparisons.
No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.
Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
18 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison: adaptation Fine-tuned on 18 mutant and 62 wild-type tumours Context-only references | A unified framework for quantitative splicing and transcript prediction (Jaganathan et al., bioRxiv 2026) Main 'Modeling tissue-specific splicing' paragraph 4; Fig. 2d Version: bioRxiv preprint version 1, posted 2026-10-11; full-text PDF (57 pages) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of the bioRxiv PDF. bioRxiv stamps the PDF when serving it (XMP ModifyDate, MetadataDate, DocumentID, InstanceID, Info ModDate and the second trailer ID), so later retrievals differ. A reviewer retrieval on 2026-10-13 of the same length (2,679,664 bytes) had SHA-256 407f5884427dda0226e0ce1f022e4479d3ff2b243da18bcc691eb345b0e04a6a and ModDate D:20261013063115-07'00'; its bytes differ only in those fields and its pdftotext text layer is identical to the pinned copy. |
| Comparison: aggregation Pooled over junctions Context-only references | A unified framework for quantitative splicing and transcript prediction (Jaganathan et al., bioRxiv 2026) Main 'Modeling tissue-specific splicing' paragraph 4; Fig. 2d Version: bioRxiv preprint version 1, posted 2026-10-11; full-text PDF (57 pages) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of the bioRxiv PDF. bioRxiv stamps the PDF when serving it (XMP ModifyDate, MetadataDate, DocumentID, InstanceID, Info ModDate and the second trailer ID), so later retrievals differ. A reviewer retrieval on 2026-10-13 of the same length (2,679,664 bytes) had SHA-256 407f5884427dda0226e0ce1f022e4479d3ff2b243da18bcc691eb345b0e04a6a and ModDate D:20261013063115-07'00'; its bytes differ only in those fields and its pdftotext text layer is identical to the pinned copy. |
| Comparison: budget Not reported Context-only references | A unified framework for quantitative splicing and transcript prediction (Jaganathan et al., bioRxiv 2026) Main 'Modeling tissue-specific splicing' paragraph 4; Fig. 2d Version: bioRxiv preprint version 1, posted 2026-10-11; full-text PDF (57 pages) | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of the bioRxiv PDF. bioRxiv stamps the PDF when serving it (XMP ModifyDate, MetadataDate, DocumentID, InstanceID, Info ModDate and the second trailer ID), so later retrievals differ. A reviewer retrieval on 2026-10-13 of the same length (2,679,664 bytes) had SHA-256 407f5884427dda0226e0ce1f022e4479d3ff2b243da18bcc691eb345b0e04a6a and ModDate D:20261013063115-07'00'; its bytes differ only in those fields and its pdftotext text layer is identical to the pinned copy. |
| Comparison: dataset version TCGA-UVM via Genomic Data Commons Context-only references | A unified framework for quantitative splicing and transcript prediction (Jaganathan et al., bioRxiv 2026) Main 'Modeling tissue-specific splicing' paragraph 4; Fig. 2d Version: bioRxiv preprint version 1, posted 2026-10-11; full-text PDF (57 pages) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of the bioRxiv PDF. bioRxiv stamps the PDF when serving it (XMP ModifyDate, MetadataDate, DocumentID, InstanceID, Info ModDate and the second trailer ID), so later retrievals differ. A reviewer retrieval on 2026-10-13 of the same length (2,679,664 bytes) had SHA-256 407f5884427dda0226e0ce1f022e4479d3ff2b243da18bcc691eb345b0e04a6a and ModDate D:20261013063115-07'00'; its bytes differ only in those fields and its pdftotext text layer is identical to the pinned copy. |
| Comparison: inputs Sequence plus SF3B1-mutant and wild-type 147-RBP signatures Context-only references | A unified framework for quantitative splicing and transcript prediction (Jaganathan et al., bioRxiv 2026) Main 'Modeling tissue-specific splicing' paragraph 4; Fig. 2d Version: bioRxiv preprint version 1, posted 2026-10-11; full-text PDF (57 pages) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of the bioRxiv PDF. bioRxiv stamps the PDF when serving it (XMP ModifyDate, MetadataDate, DocumentID, InstanceID, Info ModDate and the second trailer ID), so later retrievals differ. A reviewer retrieval on 2026-10-13 of the same length (2,679,664 bytes) had SHA-256 407f5884427dda0226e0ce1f022e4479d3ff2b243da18bcc691eb345b0e04a6a and ModDate D:20261013063115-07'00'; its bytes differ only in those fields and its pdftotext text layer is identical to the pinned copy. |
| Comparison: metric implementation Pearson on mutant-minus-wild-type usage differences Context-only references | A unified framework for quantitative splicing and transcript prediction (Jaganathan et al., bioRxiv 2026) Main 'Modeling tissue-specific splicing' paragraph 4; Fig. 2d Version: bioRxiv preprint version 1, posted 2026-10-11; full-text PDF (57 pages) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of the bioRxiv PDF. bioRxiv stamps the PDF when serving it (XMP ModifyDate, MetadataDate, DocumentID, InstanceID, Info ModDate and the second trailer ID), so later retrievals differ. A reviewer retrieval on 2026-10-13 of the same length (2,679,664 bytes) had SHA-256 407f5884427dda0226e0ce1f022e4479d3ff2b243da18bcc691eb345b0e04a6a and ModDate D:20261013063115-07'00'; its bytes differ only in those fields and its pdftotext text layer is identical to the pinned copy. |
| Comparison: population Junctions with all three SF3B1-associated features (Fig. 2d, rightmost bar labelled 697) Context-only references | A unified framework for quantitative splicing and transcript prediction (Jaganathan et al., bioRxiv 2026) Main 'Modeling tissue-specific splicing' paragraph 4; Fig. 2d Version: bioRxiv preprint version 1, posted 2026-10-11; full-text PDF (57 pages) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of the bioRxiv PDF. bioRxiv stamps the PDF when serving it (XMP ModifyDate, MetadataDate, DocumentID, InstanceID, Info ModDate and the second trailer ID), so later retrievals differ. A reviewer retrieval on 2026-10-13 of the same length (2,679,664 bytes) had SHA-256 407f5884427dda0226e0ce1f022e4479d3ff2b243da18bcc691eb345b0e04a6a and ModDate D:20261013063115-07'00'; its bytes differ only in those fields and its pdftotext text layer is identical to the pinned copy. |
| Comparison: protocol id rna-splicing-20261013-spliceai2-protocol-uvm-sf3b1 Context-only references | A unified framework for quantitative splicing and transcript prediction (Jaganathan et al., bioRxiv 2026) Main 'Modeling tissue-specific splicing' paragraph 4; Fig. 2d Version: bioRxiv preprint version 1, posted 2026-10-11; full-text PDF (57 pages) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of the bioRxiv PDF. bioRxiv stamps the PDF when serving it (XMP ModifyDate, MetadataDate, DocumentID, InstanceID, Info ModDate and the second trailer ID), so later retrievals differ. A reviewer retrieval on 2026-10-13 of the same length (2,679,664 bytes) had SHA-256 407f5884427dda0226e0ce1f022e4479d3ff2b243da18bcc691eb345b0e04a6a and ModDate D:20261013063115-07'00'; its bytes differ only in those fields and its pdftotext text layer is identical to the pinned copy. |
| Comparison: split Held-out genes Context-only references | A unified framework for quantitative splicing and transcript prediction (Jaganathan et al., bioRxiv 2026) Main 'Modeling tissue-specific splicing' paragraph 4; Fig. 2d Version: bioRxiv preprint version 1, posted 2026-10-11; full-text PDF (57 pages) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of the bioRxiv PDF. bioRxiv stamps the PDF when serving it (XMP ModifyDate, MetadataDate, DocumentID, InstanceID, Info ModDate and the second trailer ID), so later retrievals differ. A reviewer retrieval on 2026-10-13 of the same length (2,679,664 bytes) had SHA-256 407f5884427dda0226e0ce1f022e4479d3ff2b243da18bcc691eb345b0e04a6a and ModDate D:20261013063115-07'00'; its bytes differ only in those fields and its pdftotext text layer is identical to the pinned copy. |
| Origin author_reported Context-only references | A unified framework for quantitative splicing and transcript prediction (Jaganathan et al., bioRxiv 2026) Main 'Modeling tissue-specific splicing' paragraph 4; Fig. 2d Version: bioRxiv preprint version 1, posted 2026-10-11; full-text PDF (57 pages) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of the bioRxiv PDF. bioRxiv stamps the PDF when serving it (XMP ModifyDate, MetadataDate, DocumentID, InstanceID, Info ModDate and the second trailer ID), so later retrievals differ. A reviewer retrieval on 2026-10-13 of the same length (2,679,664 bytes) had SHA-256 407f5884427dda0226e0ce1f022e4479d3ff2b243da18bcc691eb345b0e04a6a and ModDate D:20261013063115-07'00'; its bytes differ only in those fields and its pdftotext text layer is identical to the pinned copy. |
Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked
Stable ID: rna-splicing-20261013-spliceai2-eval-uvm-sf3b1-spliceai2-sf3b1-uvm