Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples.
These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation. A source-checked score alone does not meet these requirements.
Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Evidence verified: Not verified
Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.
No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.
1 evaluation · 7 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: Original | Protocol: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison (vaccine-antigen candidate prediction) Dataset: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison | 0.94 AUROC fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceOriginal: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples. Aggregation: Not reported Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Original, column AUROC; XML row2 column8 |
| Configuration: Original | Protocol: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison (vaccine-antigen candidate prediction) Dataset: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison | 0.96 ± 0.008 Weighted F1 fraction · higher Uncertainty: type: reported_plus_minus_type_unresolved; value: 0.008 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceOriginal: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples. Aggregation: Not reported Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Original, column Weighted F1; XML row2 column5 |
| Configuration: Original | Protocol: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison (vaccine-antigen candidate prediction) Dataset: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison | 0.78 ± 0.046 MCC dimensionless · higher Uncertainty: type: reported_plus_minus_type_unresolved; value: 0.046 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceOriginal: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples. Aggregation: Not reported Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Original, column MCC; XML row2 column6 |
| Configuration: Original | Protocol: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison (vaccine-antigen candidate prediction) Dataset: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison | 0.84 ± 0.049 AUPRC fraction · higher Uncertainty: type: reported_plus_minus_type_unresolved; value: 0.049 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceOriginal: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples. Aggregation: Not reported Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Original, column AUPRC; XML row2 column7 |
| Configuration: Original | Protocol: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison (vaccine-antigen candidate prediction) Dataset: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison | 0.74 ± 0.071 Sensitivity fraction · higher Uncertainty: type: reported_plus_minus_type_unresolved; value: 0.071 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceOriginal: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples. Aggregation: Not reported Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Original, column Sensitivity; XML row2 column3 |
| Configuration: Original | Protocol: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison (vaccine-antigen candidate prediction) Dataset: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison | 0.96 ± 0.008 Val Accuracy fraction · higher Uncertainty: type: reported_plus_minus_type_unresolved; value: 0.008 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceOriginal: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples. Aggregation: Not reported Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Original, column Val Accuracy; XML row2 column2 |
| Configuration: Original | Protocol: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison (vaccine-antigen candidate prediction) Dataset: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison | 0.99 ± 0.004 Specificity fraction · higher Uncertainty: type: reported_plus_minus_type_unresolved; value: 0.004 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceOriginal: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples. Aggregation: Not reported Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Original, column Specificity; XML row2 column4 |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220.
Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples.
Metadata review: needs review. Unreported conditions prevent automatic comparisons.
No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.
Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
19 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| attributes.comparison.adaptation Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label Context-only references | Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features Table 1.: Val Accuracy, Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Version: preprint version in PMC | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.comparison.aggregation Not reported Context-only references | Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features Table 1.: Val Accuracy, Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Version: preprint version in PMC | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.comparison.budget Not reported Context-only references | Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features Table 1.: Val Accuracy, Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Version: preprint version in PMC | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.comparison.dataset_version Not reported Context-only references | Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features Table 1.: Val Accuracy, Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Version: preprint version in PMC | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.comparison.inputs Not reported Context-only references | Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features Table 1.: Val Accuracy, Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Version: preprint version in PMC | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.comparison.metric_implementation Not reported Context-only references | Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features Table 1.: Val Accuracy, Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Version: preprint version in PMC | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.comparison.population Not reported Context-only references | Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features Table 1.: Val Accuracy, Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Version: preprint version in PMC | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.comparison.protocol_id paper-protocol-a7bf3c8f6b432c3093 Context-only references | Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features Table 1.: Val Accuracy, Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Version: preprint version in PMC | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.comparison.split 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples. Context-only references | Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features Table 1.: Val Accuracy, Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Version: preprint version in PMC | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.comparison.subset Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Context-only references | Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features Table 1.: Val Accuracy, Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Version: preprint version in PMC | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: needs review
Stable ID: paper-evaluation-b77f564626c00343d2