rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Evaluation

DeepDTA on PLABench Davis-cold-target

Published comparison transcribed from the pinned source; not reproduced.

Evaluation results

1 evaluation · 6 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Protocol: PLABench Davis, cold-target split · Dataset: Davis cold-target test set (PLABench)

Sorted by Concordance index (PLABench Davis-cold-target) (higher is better). The best value in each column is highlighted. Decimals are rounded for display; each value links to the printed value and its source.

Tested configurationConcordance index (PLABench Davis-cold-target)Modified squared correlation (PLABench Davis-cold-target)MSE (PLABench Davis-cold-target)Pearson (PLABench Davis-cold-target)RMSE (PLABench Davis-cold-target)Spearman (PLABench Davis-cold-target)
DeepDTA (retrained on Davis and KIBA, PLABench)Evaluation0.80.3590.3810.6250.6170.521
All 6 result rows with coverage, uncertainty and sources
Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: DeepDTA (retrained on Davis and KIBA, PLABench)Protocol: PLABench Davis, cold-target split
Dataset: Davis cold-target test set (PLABench)
0.8 Concordance index (PLABench Davis-cold-target)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DeepDTA on PLABench Davis-cold-target

lit-interactions-20261011-leakctl-protocol-davis-cold-target

Aggregation: Not reported

Leakage-controlled benchmarking reveals generalization limits of deep learning for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction · Table 2, row 'DeepDTA', strategy 'Cold-target', dataset 'Davis', column 'CI' (text-layer line 442)
Configuration: DeepDTA (retrained on Davis and KIBA, PLABench)Protocol: PLABench Davis, cold-target split
Dataset: Davis cold-target test set (PLABench)
0.381 MSE (PLABench Davis-cold-target)
unit-unreported · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DeepDTA on PLABench Davis-cold-target

lit-interactions-20261011-leakctl-protocol-davis-cold-target

Aggregation: Not reported

Leakage-controlled benchmarking reveals generalization limits of deep learning for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction · Table 2, row 'DeepDTA', strategy 'Cold-target', dataset 'Davis', column 'MSE' (text-layer line 442)
Configuration: DeepDTA (retrained on Davis and KIBA, PLABench)Protocol: PLABench Davis, cold-target split
Dataset: Davis cold-target test set (PLABench)
0.625 Pearson (PLABench Davis-cold-target)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DeepDTA on PLABench Davis-cold-target

lit-interactions-20261011-leakctl-protocol-davis-cold-target

Aggregation: Not reported

Leakage-controlled benchmarking reveals generalization limits of deep learning for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction · Table 2, row 'DeepDTA', strategy 'Cold-target', dataset 'Davis', column 'Pearson' (text-layer line 442)
Configuration: DeepDTA (retrained on Davis and KIBA, PLABench)Protocol: PLABench Davis, cold-target split
Dataset: Davis cold-target test set (PLABench)
0.359 Modified squared correlation (PLABench Davis-cold-target)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DeepDTA on PLABench Davis-cold-target

lit-interactions-20261011-leakctl-protocol-davis-cold-target

Aggregation: Not reported

Leakage-controlled benchmarking reveals generalization limits of deep learning for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction · Table 2, row 'DeepDTA', strategy 'Cold-target', dataset 'Davis', column 'rm2' (text-layer line 442)
Configuration: DeepDTA (retrained on Davis and KIBA, PLABench)Protocol: PLABench Davis, cold-target split
Dataset: Davis cold-target test set (PLABench)
0.617 RMSE (PLABench Davis-cold-target)
unit-unreported · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DeepDTA on PLABench Davis-cold-target

lit-interactions-20261011-leakctl-protocol-davis-cold-target

Aggregation: Not reported

Leakage-controlled benchmarking reveals generalization limits of deep learning for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction · Table 2, row 'DeepDTA', strategy 'Cold-target', dataset 'Davis', column 'RMSE' (text-layer line 442)
Configuration: DeepDTA (retrained on Davis and KIBA, PLABench)Protocol: PLABench Davis, cold-target split
Dataset: Davis cold-target test set (PLABench)
0.521 Spearman (PLABench Davis-cold-target)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DeepDTA on PLABench Davis-cold-target

lit-interactions-20261011-leakctl-protocol-davis-cold-target

Aggregation: Not reported

Leakage-controlled benchmarking reveals generalization limits of deep learning for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction · Table 2, row 'DeepDTA', strategy 'Cold-target', dataset 'Davis', column 'Spearman' (text-layer line 442)

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-23-5347695500ed.

Research readiness

0 of 4 readiness checks met. These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation; a source-checked score alone does not meet them.

Readiness checks, gaps and artifacts

Release 2026-10-23-5347695500ed · Evidence verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Replay metrics

Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • Metrics are recomputed from the saved predictions: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Investigate discrepancies

Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • Metrics are recomputed from the saved predictions: not yet verified
  • Sample annotations are recorded: not yet verified
  • Dependence between samples is assessed: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Run locally

A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • A pinned run recipe exists: not yet verified
  • Compute requirements are estimated: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Validate independently

Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • Independent validation data exist: not yet verified
  • Overlap with training data is checked: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.

Artifacts and reproduction

No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.

Evaluation procedure

PLABench Davis, cold-target split

Configuration
DeepDTA (retrained on Davis and KIBA, PLABench)
Protocol
PLABench Davis, cold-target split
Dataset
Davis cold-target test set (PLABench)
origin
Independent external evaluation
configuration
Primary source as retrieved 2026-10-11
protocol id
lit-interactions-20261011-leakctl-protocol-davis-cold-target
dataset version
PLABench bioRxiv v1
split
Davis-cold-target
population
Not reported
inputs
Protein sequence and ligand SMILES
adaptation
Retrained by the benchmark authors
metric implementation
As defined in Methods, 'Evaluation metrics'
aggregation
Predictions of the five fold models on one fixed test set aggregated (Methods lines 389-394); the aggregation function is not stated
budget
Not reported

Metadata review: source checked. Unreported conditions prevent automatic comparisons.

Reproduction

Split
Davis-cold-target
Adaptation
Retrained by the benchmark authors
Scoring implementation
As defined in Methods, 'Evaluation metrics'

No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.

Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

18 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-23-5347695500ed
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Comparison: adaptation
Retrained by the benchmark authors
Context-only references
Leakage-controlled benchmarking reveals generalization limits of deep learning for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction

Original source ↗

Table 2 row 'DeepDTA', column group 'strategy 'Cold-target', dataset 'Davis''

Version: bioRxiv 10.64898/2026.09.17.752433v1 (posted 2026-09-23); 30-page PDF
Retrieved: 2026-10-11T21:28:04Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.adaptation

Source artifact SHA-256: 5fba9691f7d0777d19dabc66144e5c23d40e430de4919f97b92e4d50fb397281

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: aggregation
Predictions of the five fold models on one fixed test set aggregated (Methods lines 389-394); the aggregation function is not stated
Context-only references
Leakage-controlled benchmarking reveals generalization limits of deep learning for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction

Original source ↗

Table 2 row 'DeepDTA', column group 'strategy 'Cold-target', dataset 'Davis''

Version: bioRxiv 10.64898/2026.09.17.752433v1 (posted 2026-09-23); 30-page PDF
Retrieved: 2026-10-11T21:28:04Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.aggregation

Source artifact SHA-256: 5fba9691f7d0777d19dabc66144e5c23d40e430de4919f97b92e4d50fb397281

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: budget
Not reported
Context-only references
Leakage-controlled benchmarking reveals generalization limits of deep learning for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction

Original source ↗

Table 2 row 'DeepDTA', column group 'strategy 'Cold-target', dataset 'Davis''

Version: bioRxiv 10.64898/2026.09.17.752433v1 (posted 2026-09-23); 30-page PDF
Retrieved: 2026-10-11T21:28:04Z

missing or unspecified

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.budget

Source artifact SHA-256: 5fba9691f7d0777d19dabc66144e5c23d40e430de4919f97b92e4d50fb397281

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: dataset version
PLABench bioRxiv v1
Context-only references
Leakage-controlled benchmarking reveals generalization limits of deep learning for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction

Original source ↗

Table 2 row 'DeepDTA', column group 'strategy 'Cold-target', dataset 'Davis''

Version: bioRxiv 10.64898/2026.09.17.752433v1 (posted 2026-09-23); 30-page PDF
Retrieved: 2026-10-11T21:28:04Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.dataset_version

Source artifact SHA-256: 5fba9691f7d0777d19dabc66144e5c23d40e430de4919f97b92e4d50fb397281

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: inputs
Protein sequence and ligand SMILES
Context-only references
Leakage-controlled benchmarking reveals generalization limits of deep learning for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction

Original source ↗

Table 2 row 'DeepDTA', column group 'strategy 'Cold-target', dataset 'Davis''

Version: bioRxiv 10.64898/2026.09.17.752433v1 (posted 2026-09-23); 30-page PDF
Retrieved: 2026-10-11T21:28:04Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.inputs

Source artifact SHA-256: 5fba9691f7d0777d19dabc66144e5c23d40e430de4919f97b92e4d50fb397281

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: metric implementation
As defined in Methods, 'Evaluation metrics'
Context-only references
Leakage-controlled benchmarking reveals generalization limits of deep learning for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction

Original source ↗

Table 2 row 'DeepDTA', column group 'strategy 'Cold-target', dataset 'Davis''

Version: bioRxiv 10.64898/2026.09.17.752433v1 (posted 2026-09-23); 30-page PDF
Retrieved: 2026-10-11T21:28:04Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.metric_implementation

Source artifact SHA-256: 5fba9691f7d0777d19dabc66144e5c23d40e430de4919f97b92e4d50fb397281

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: population
Not reported
Context-only references
Leakage-controlled benchmarking reveals generalization limits of deep learning for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction

Original source ↗

Table 2 row 'DeepDTA', column group 'strategy 'Cold-target', dataset 'Davis''

Version: bioRxiv 10.64898/2026.09.17.752433v1 (posted 2026-09-23); 30-page PDF
Retrieved: 2026-10-11T21:28:04Z

missing or unspecified

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.population

Source artifact SHA-256: 5fba9691f7d0777d19dabc66144e5c23d40e430de4919f97b92e4d50fb397281

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: protocol id
lit-interactions-20261011-leakctl-protocol-davis-cold-target
Context-only references
Leakage-controlled benchmarking reveals generalization limits of deep learning for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction

Original source ↗

Table 2 row 'DeepDTA', column group 'strategy 'Cold-target', dataset 'Davis''

Version: bioRxiv 10.64898/2026.09.17.752433v1 (posted 2026-09-23); 30-page PDF
Retrieved: 2026-10-11T21:28:04Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.protocol_id

Source artifact SHA-256: 5fba9691f7d0777d19dabc66144e5c23d40e430de4919f97b92e4d50fb397281

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: split
Davis-cold-target
Context-only references
Leakage-controlled benchmarking reveals generalization limits of deep learning for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction

Original source ↗

Table 2 row 'DeepDTA', column group 'strategy 'Cold-target', dataset 'Davis''

Version: bioRxiv 10.64898/2026.09.17.752433v1 (posted 2026-09-23); 30-page PDF
Retrieved: 2026-10-11T21:28:04Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.split

Source artifact SHA-256: 5fba9691f7d0777d19dabc66144e5c23d40e430de4919f97b92e4d50fb397281

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Origin
independent_paper
Context-only references
Leakage-controlled benchmarking reveals generalization limits of deep learning for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction

Original source ↗

Table 2 row 'DeepDTA', column group 'strategy 'Cold-target', dataset 'Davis''

Version: bioRxiv 10.64898/2026.09.17.752433v1 (posted 2026-09-23); 30-page PDF
Retrieved: 2026-10-11T21:28:04Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Audit details

Field: attributes.origin

Source artifact SHA-256: 5fba9691f7d0777d19dabc66144e5c23d40e430de4919f97b92e4d50fb397281

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

How to read the evidence

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-23-5347695500ed · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: lit-interactions-20261011-leakctl-eval-deepdta-davis-cold-target

areas
molecular-interactions
contexts
research
origin
independent_paper
protocol
lit-interactions-20261011-leakctl-protocol-davis-cold-target
version
Primary source as retrieved 2026-10-11
comparison
protocol id: lit-interactions-20261011-leakctl-protocol-davis-cold-target; dataset version: PLABench bioRxiv v1; split: Davis-cold-target; population: Not reported; inputs: Protein sequence and ligand SMILES; adaptation: Retrained by the benchmark authors; metric implementation: As defined in Methods, 'Evaluation metrics'; aggregation: Predictions of the five fold models on one fixed test set aggregated (Methods lines 389-394); the aggregation function is not stated; budget: Not reported
source locator
Table 2 row 'DeepDTA', column group 'strategy 'Cold-target', dataset 'Davis''
missing metadata
comparison.budget: reason: unreported; comparison.population: reason: unreported
Related records

Suggest a correction