The split of Cloning CLF that PFMBench evaluated on. The upstream dataset release is not catalogued here, so no claim is made that this matches its original splits.
These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation. A source-checked score alone does not meet these requirements.
Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Evidence verified: Not verified
Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.
No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.
12 evaluations · 12 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: DPLM | Task: PFMBench CLONING-CLF: Cloning CLF Dataset subset: Cloning CLF (PFMBench split) | 0.812 auroc fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceDPLM on PFMBench CLONING-CLF: Cloning CLF Fine-tuned with an adapter under the PFMBench harness; train, validation and test counts are in Table 1. Aggregation: Not reported pfmbench primary benchmark evidence · Table 3, row(DPLM [ 68 ]), column(Clo. CLF) |
| Configuration: ESM-2 | Task: PFMBench CLONING-CLF: Cloning CLF Dataset subset: Cloning CLF (PFMBench split) | 0.806 auroc fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceESM-2 on PFMBench CLONING-CLF: Cloning CLF Fine-tuned with an adapter under the PFMBench harness; train, validation and test counts are in Table 1. Aggregation: Not reported pfmbench primary benchmark evidence · Table 3, row(ESM-2 [ 35 ]), column(Clo. CLF) |
| Configuration: ESM-C | Task: PFMBench CLONING-CLF: Cloning CLF Dataset subset: Cloning CLF (PFMBench split) | 0.81 auroc fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceESM-C on PFMBench CLONING-CLF: Cloning CLF Fine-tuned with an adapter under the PFMBench harness; train, validation and test counts are in Table 1. Aggregation: Not reported pfmbench primary benchmark evidence · Table 3, row(ESM-C), column(Clo. CLF) |
| Configuration: ESM3 | Task: PFMBench CLONING-CLF: Cloning CLF Dataset subset: Cloning CLF (PFMBench split) | 0.774 auroc fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceESM3 on PFMBench CLONING-CLF: Cloning CLF Fine-tuned with an adapter under the PFMBench harness; train, validation and test counts are in Table 1. Aggregation: Not reported pfmbench primary benchmark evidence · Table 3, row(ESM3 [ 18 ]), column(Clo. CLF) |
| Configuration: PGLM | Task: PFMBench CLONING-CLF: Cloning CLF Dataset subset: Cloning CLF (PFMBench split) | 0.836 auroc fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcePGLM on PFMBench CLONING-CLF: Cloning CLF Fine-tuned with an adapter under the PFMBench harness; train, validation and test counts are in Table 1. Aggregation: Not reported pfmbench primary benchmark evidence · Table 3, row(PGLM [ 5 ]), column(Clo. CLF) |
| Configuration: ProstT5 | Task: PFMBench CLONING-CLF: Cloning CLF Dataset subset: Cloning CLF (PFMBench split) | 0.799 auroc fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceProstT5 on PFMBench CLONING-CLF: Cloning CLF Fine-tuned with an adapter under the PFMBench harness; train, validation and test counts are in Table 1. Aggregation: Not reported pfmbench primary benchmark evidence · Table 3, row(ProstT5 [ 21 ]), column(Clo. CLF) |
| Configuration: ProtGPT2 | Task: PFMBench CLONING-CLF: Cloning CLF Dataset subset: Cloning CLF (PFMBench split) | 0.777 auroc fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceProtGPT2 on PFMBench CLONING-CLF: Cloning CLF Fine-tuned with an adapter under the PFMBench harness; train, validation and test counts are in Table 1. Aggregation: Not reported pfmbench primary benchmark evidence · Table 3, row(ProtGPT2 [ 12 ]), column(Clo. CLF) |
| Configuration: ProTrek | Task: PFMBench CLONING-CLF: Cloning CLF Dataset subset: Cloning CLF (PFMBench split) | 0.826 auroc fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceProTrek on PFMBench CLONING-CLF: Cloning CLF Fine-tuned with an adapter under the PFMBench harness; train, validation and test counts are in Table 1. Aggregation: Not reported pfmbench primary benchmark evidence · Table 3, row(ProTrek [ 56 ]), column(Clo. CLF) |
| Configuration: ProtST | Task: PFMBench CLONING-CLF: Cloning CLF Dataset subset: Cloning CLF (PFMBench split) | 0.807 auroc fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceProtST on PFMBench CLONING-CLF: Cloning CLF Fine-tuned with an adapter under the PFMBench harness; train, validation and test counts are in Table 1. Aggregation: Not reported pfmbench primary benchmark evidence · Table 3, row(ProtST [ 71 ]), column(Clo. CLF) |
| Configuration: ProtT5 | Task: PFMBench CLONING-CLF: Cloning CLF Dataset subset: Cloning CLF (PFMBench split) | 0.785 auroc fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceProtT5 on PFMBench CLONING-CLF: Cloning CLF Fine-tuned with an adapter under the PFMBench harness; train, validation and test counts are in Table 1. Aggregation: Not reported pfmbench primary benchmark evidence · Table 3, row(ProtT5 [ 11 ]), column(Clo. CLF) |
| Configuration: SaProt | Task: PFMBench CLONING-CLF: Cloning CLF Dataset subset: Cloning CLF (PFMBench split) | 0.812 auroc fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceSaProt on PFMBench CLONING-CLF: Cloning CLF Fine-tuned with an adapter under the PFMBench harness; train, validation and test counts are in Table 1. Aggregation: Not reported pfmbench primary benchmark evidence · Table 3, row(SaProt [ 55 ]), column(Clo. CLF) |
| Configuration: VenusPLM | Task: PFMBench CLONING-CLF: Cloning CLF Dataset subset: Cloning CLF (PFMBench split) | 0 .83172 auroc fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceVenusPLM on PFMBench CLONING-CLF: Cloning CLF Fine-tuned with an adapter under the PFMBench harness; train, validation and test counts are in Table 1. Aggregation: Not reported pfmbench primary benchmark evidence · Table 3, row(VenusPLM [ 59 ]), column(Clo. CLF) |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220.
This record describes a particular subset or cohort used in an evaluation. Its results do not describe the full dataset.
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
2 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| description The split of Cloning CLF that PFMBench evaluated on. The upstream dataset release is not catalogued here, so no claim is made that this matches its original splits. Context-only references | pfmbench primary benchmark evidence No field-specific location recorded Version: 2506.14796v1 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| name Cloning CLF (PFMBench split) Context-only references | pfmbench primary benchmark evidence No field-specific location recorded Version: 2506.14796v1 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: source checked
Stable ID: pfmbench-dataset-cloning-clf