Propensity-matched pairs from the RPE1 confound battery; the matched count is not printed.
2 evaluations · 2 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5.
0 of 4 readiness checks met. These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation; a source-checked score alone does not meet them.
Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5 · Evidence verified: Not verified
Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.
No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.
This record describes a particular subset or cohort used in an evaluation. Its results do not describe the full dataset.
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
5 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Source dataset label Replogle CRISPRi (RPE1), propensity-matched Context-only references | Systematic evaluation of single-cell foundation model interpretability: attention-derived edge scores add no incremental value over gene-level features for perturbation-target prediction (Kendiukhov 2026, BMC Genomics 27:634) Page 10, 'Cross-cell-type generalisation of confound pattern', item (iii) Version: Version of record, BMC Genomics 27:634, published 2026-07-22 (received 2026-03-10, accepted 2026-05-14) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Source location Page 10, 'Cross-cell-type generalisation of confound pattern', item (iii) Context-only references | Systematic evaluation of single-cell foundation model interpretability: attention-derived edge scores add no incremental value over gene-level features for perturbation-target prediction (Kendiukhov 2026, BMC Genomics 27:634) Page 10, 'Cross-cell-type generalisation of confound pattern', item (iii) Version: Version of record, BMC Genomics 27:634, published 2026-07-22 (received 2026-03-10, accepted 2026-05-14) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Split No train/test split for edge AUROC; cross-validation where stated by the protocol Context-only references | Systematic evaluation of single-cell foundation model interpretability: attention-derived edge scores add no incremental value over gene-level features for perturbation-target prediction (Kendiukhov 2026, BMC Genomics 27:634) Page 10, 'Cross-cell-type generalisation of confound pattern', item (iii) Version: Version of record, BMC Genomics 27:634, published 2026-07-22 (received 2026-03-10, accepted 2026-05-14) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Description Propensity-matched pairs from the RPE1 confound battery; the matched count is not printed. Context-only references | Systematic evaluation of single-cell foundation model interpretability: attention-derived edge scores add no incremental value over gene-level features for perturbation-target prediction (Kendiukhov 2026, BMC Genomics 27:634) Page 10, 'Cross-cell-type generalisation of confound pattern', item (iii) Version: Version of record, BMC Genomics 27:634, published 2026-07-22 (received 2026-03-10, accepted 2026-05-14) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Name Replogle CRISPRi RPE1, propensity-matched pairs (Kendiukhov 2026) Context-only references | Systematic evaluation of single-cell foundation model interpretability: attention-derived edge scores add no incremental value over gene-level features for perturbation-target prediction (Kendiukhov 2026, BMC Genomics 27:634) Page 10, 'Cross-cell-type generalisation of confound pattern', item (iii) Version: Version of record, BMC Genomics 27:634, published 2026-07-22 (received 2026-03-10, accepted 2026-05-14) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5 · Record review: source checked
Stable ID: gfm-guides-20261014-kendiukhov2026-data-rpe1-crispri-propensity-matched