Dataset and cohort used in the cited comparison. Dataset population counts do not establish successful prediction coverage.
These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation. A source-checked score alone does not meet these requirements.
Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Evidence verified: Not verified
Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.
No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.
10 evaluations · 40 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: MXfold2 | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.632 Precision unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 4: Rfam12.3–14.10 Precision |
| Configuration: CONTRAfold | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.702 Recall unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 7 CONTRAfold, column 5: Rfam12.3–14.10 Recall |
| Configuration: MXfold2 | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.664 F1 unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 3: Rfam12.3–14.10 F1 |
| Configuration: SPOT-RNA | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.678 Precision unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 SPOT-RNA, column 4: Rfam12.3–14.10 Precision |
| Configuration: EternaFold | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.672 INF unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 8 EternaFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF |
| Configuration: SPOT-RNA | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.672 F1 unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 SPOT-RNA, column 3: Rfam12.3–14.10 F1 |
| Configuration: RNAfold | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.729 Recall unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 10 RNAfold, column 5: Rfam12.3–14.10 Recall |
| Configuration: RNAstructure | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.643 F1 unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 12 RNAstructure, column 3: Rfam12.3–14.10 F1 |
| Configuration: BPfold | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.741 Recall unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 BPfold, column 5: Rfam12.3–14.10 Recall |
| Configuration: ContextFold | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.595 Precision unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 6 ContextFold, column 4: Rfam12.3–14.10 Precision |
| Configuration: EternaFold | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.664 F1 unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 8 EternaFold, column 3: Rfam12.3–14.10 F1 |
| Configuration: LinearFold | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.669 Recall unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 9 LinearFold, column 5: Rfam12.3–14.10 Recall |
| Configuration: BPfold | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.66 Precision unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 BPfold, column 4: Rfam12.3–14.10 Precision |
| Configuration: CONTRAfold | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.667 INF unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 7 CONTRAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF |
| Configuration: RNAfold | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.649 F1 unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 10 RNAfold, column 3: Rfam12.3–14.10 F1 |
| Configuration: MXfold2 | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.67 INF unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF |
| Configuration: SimFold | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.646 INF unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 11 SimFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF |
| Configuration: LinearFold | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.677 Precision unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 9 LinearFold, column 4: Rfam12.3–14.10 Precision |
| Configuration: SimFold | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.639 F1 unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 11 SimFold, column 3: Rfam12.3–14.10 F1 |
| Configuration: RNAstructure | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.651 INF unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 12 RNAstructure, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF |
| Configuration: RNAstructure | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.724 Recall unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 12 RNAstructure, column 5: Rfam12.3–14.10 Recall |
| Configuration: ContextFold | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.648 Recall unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 6 ContextFold, column 5: Rfam12.3–14.10 Recall |
| Configuration: MXfold2 | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.72 Recall unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 5: Rfam12.3–14.10 Recall |
| Configuration: ContextFold | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.612 F1 unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 6 ContextFold, column 3: Rfam12.3–14.10 F1 |
| Configuration: CONTRAfold | Protocol: Rfam12.3–14.10 (RNA secondary structure) Dataset: Rfam12.3–14.10 | 0.66 F1 unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceFamily-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Aggregation: Not reported Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 7 CONTRAfold, column 3: Rfam12.3–14.10 F1 |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220.
A dataset supplies biological observations. The evaluation protocol defines how those observations are split, used and scored.
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
7 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| attributes.reported_population.count 10791 Context-only references | Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy Family-wise evaluation of three DL methods (BPfold, SPOT-RNA, and MXfold2), three shallow learning methods (ContextFold, CONTRAfold, and EternaFold) and non-learning methods (LinearFold, RNAfold, SimFold, and RNAstructure) on Rfam12.3–14.10 ( n = 10,791 RNAs) and PDB ( n = 116 RNAs) datasets; Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 BPfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 SPOT-RNA, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 6 ContextFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 7 CONTRAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 8 EternaFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 9 LinearFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 10 RNAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 11 SimFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 12 RNAstructure, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF Version: version of record | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.reported_population.unit RNA sequences Context-only references | Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy Family-wise evaluation of three DL methods (BPfold, SPOT-RNA, and MXfold2), three shallow learning methods (ContextFold, CONTRAfold, and EternaFold) and non-learning methods (LinearFold, RNAfold, SimFold, and RNAstructure) on Rfam12.3–14.10 ( n = 10,791 RNAs) and PDB ( n = 116 RNAs) datasets; Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 BPfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 SPOT-RNA, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 6 ContextFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 7 CONTRAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 8 EternaFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 9 LinearFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 10 RNAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 11 SimFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 12 RNAstructure, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF Version: version of record | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.source_locator Family-wise evaluation of three DL methods (BPfold, SPOT-RNA, and MXfold2), three shallow learning methods (ContextFold, CONTRAfold, and EternaFold) and non-learning methods (LinearFold, RNAfold, SimFold, and RNAstructure) on Rfam12.3–14.10 ( n = 10,791 RNAs) and PDB ( n = 116 RNAs) datasets; Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 BPfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 SPOT-RNA, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 6 ContextFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 7 CONTRAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 8 EternaFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 9 LinearFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 10 RNAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 11 SimFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 12 RNAstructure, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF Context-only references | Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy Family-wise evaluation of three DL methods (BPfold, SPOT-RNA, and MXfold2), three shallow learning methods (ContextFold, CONTRAfold, and EternaFold) and non-learning methods (LinearFold, RNAfold, SimFold, and RNAstructure) on Rfam12.3–14.10 ( n = 10,791 RNAs) and PDB ( n = 116 RNAs) datasets; Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 BPfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 SPOT-RNA, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 6 ContextFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 7 CONTRAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 8 EternaFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 9 LinearFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 10 RNAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 11 SimFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 12 RNAstructure, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF Version: version of record | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.split Family-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics. Context-only references | Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy Family-wise evaluation of three DL methods (BPfold, SPOT-RNA, and MXfold2), three shallow learning methods (ContextFold, CONTRAfold, and EternaFold) and non-learning methods (LinearFold, RNAfold, SimFold, and RNAstructure) on Rfam12.3–14.10 ( n = 10,791 RNAs) and PDB ( n = 116 RNAs) datasets; Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 BPfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 SPOT-RNA, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 6 ContextFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 7 CONTRAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 8 EternaFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 9 LinearFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 10 RNAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 11 SimFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 12 RNAstructure, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF Version: version of record | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.subset Not reported Context-only references | Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy Family-wise evaluation of three DL methods (BPfold, SPOT-RNA, and MXfold2), three shallow learning methods (ContextFold, CONTRAfold, and EternaFold) and non-learning methods (LinearFold, RNAfold, SimFold, and RNAstructure) on Rfam12.3–14.10 ( n = 10,791 RNAs) and PDB ( n = 116 RNAs) datasets; Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 BPfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 SPOT-RNA, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 6 ContextFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 7 CONTRAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 8 EternaFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 9 LinearFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 10 RNAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 11 SimFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 12 RNAstructure, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF Version: version of record | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| description Dataset and cohort used in the cited comparison. Dataset population counts do not establish successful prediction coverage. Context-only references | Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy Family-wise evaluation of three DL methods (BPfold, SPOT-RNA, and MXfold2), three shallow learning methods (ContextFold, CONTRAfold, and EternaFold) and non-learning methods (LinearFold, RNAfold, SimFold, and RNAstructure) on Rfam12.3–14.10 ( n = 10,791 RNAs) and PDB ( n = 116 RNAs) datasets; Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 BPfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 SPOT-RNA, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 6 ContextFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 7 CONTRAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 8 EternaFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 9 LinearFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 10 RNAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 11 SimFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 12 RNAstructure, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF Version: version of record | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| name Rfam12.3–14.10 Context-only references | Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy Family-wise evaluation of three DL methods (BPfold, SPOT-RNA, and MXfold2), three shallow learning methods (ContextFold, CONTRAfold, and EternaFold) and non-learning methods (LinearFold, RNAfold, SimFold, and RNAstructure) on Rfam12.3–14.10 ( n = 10,791 RNAs) and PDB ( n = 116 RNAs) datasets; Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 BPfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 SPOT-RNA, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 6 ContextFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 7 CONTRAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 8 EternaFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 9 LinearFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 10 RNAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 11 SimFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 12 RNAstructure, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF Version: version of record | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: needs review
Stable ID: paper-dataset-816ebb930725137655