rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Configuration

OncoVI 2026 publication configuration

Automated ClinGen/CGC/VICC criteria and VEP-based annotation using paper resource versions; hg38 coordinates.

4 evaluations · 25 results

Overview

An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

4 evaluations · 25 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Sorted by Accuracy (higher is better). The best value in each column is highlighted. Decimals are rounded for display; each value links to the printed value and its source.

Tested configurationProtocol and datasetAccuracyCorrelation (correlation type not stated)Percent agreement (gene role: oncogene)Percent agreement (gene role: tumour suppressor)Percent agreement (variant type: missense)Percent agreement (variant type: truncating)Recall (class: oncogenic)Accuracy (gene role: oncogene)Accuracy (gene role: tumour suppressor)Accuracy (variant type: missense)Accuracy (variant type: truncating)Percent agreementPercent agreement (class: benign)Percent agreement (class: VUS)Percent agreement (oncogenic vs pathogenic)Percent agreement (prior mtb classification vs expert reassessment)Percent agreement (vs expert reassessment)Recall (class: benign)
OncoVI 2026 publication configurationEvaluationOncoVI three-class assessment: ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions, ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions83% (best in column)Not reported76.1%85.7% (best in column)81.1% (best in column)87.5% (best in column)84%Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
OncoVI 2026 publication configurationEvaluationOncoVI three-class assessment: Guideline SOP variants, Guideline SOP variants81%0.87 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported88% (best in column)82%87.1%83.1%77.7%Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported83%
OncoVI 2026 publication configurationEvaluationOncoVI three-class assessment: MTB selected expert reassessment, MTB selected expert reassessmentNot reported0.7Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported22%80%Not reported
OncoVI 2026 publication configurationEvaluationOncoVI three-class assessment: Erlangen MTB variants, Erlangen MTB variantsNot reportedNot reported82.5% (best in column)76%78.2%49.4%Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported78%43%97%79%Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
All 25 result rows with coverage, uncertainty and sources
Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions
Dataset: ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions
83% Accuracy
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions, accuracy; subgroup values correspond to Supplemental Table S6
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions
Dataset: ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions
81.1% Percent agreement (variant type: missense)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions, missense_concordance; subgroup values correspond to Supplemental Table S6
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions
Dataset: ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions
76.1% Percent agreement (gene role: oncogene)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions, oncogene_concordance; subgroup values correspond to Supplemental Table S6
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions
Dataset: ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions
84% Recall (class: oncogenic)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions, oncogenic_sensitivity; subgroup values correspond to Supplemental Table S6
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions
Dataset: ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions
87.5% Percent agreement (variant type: truncating)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions, truncating_concordance; subgroup values correspond to Supplemental Table S6
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions
Dataset: ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions
85.7% Percent agreement (gene role: tumour suppressor)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, ClinVar April 2025 oncogenicity assertions, tsg_concordance; subgroup values correspond to Supplemental Table S6
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: MTB selected expert reassessment
Dataset: MTB selected expert reassessment
80% Percent agreement (vs expert reassessment)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: MTB selected expert reassessment

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, MTB selected expert reassessment, expert_concordance; subgroup values correspond to Supplemental Table S6
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: MTB selected expert reassessment
Dataset: MTB selected expert reassessment
22% Percent agreement (prior mtb classification vs expert reassessment)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: MTB selected expert reassessment

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, MTB selected expert reassessment, prior_mtb_concordance; subgroup values correspond to Supplemental Table S6
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: MTB selected expert reassessment
Dataset: MTB selected expert reassessment
0.7 Correlation (correlation type not stated)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: MTB selected expert reassessment

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, Figure 4C, concordant variants only
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: Erlangen MTB variants
Dataset: Erlangen MTB variants
43% Percent agreement (class: benign)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: Erlangen MTB variants

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, Erlangen MTB variants, benign_concordance; subgroup values correspond to Supplemental Table S6
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: Erlangen MTB variants
Dataset: Erlangen MTB variants
78% Percent agreement
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: Erlangen MTB variants

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, Erlangen MTB variants, concordance; subgroup values correspond to Supplemental Table S6
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: Erlangen MTB variants
Dataset: Erlangen MTB variants
78.2% Percent agreement (variant type: missense)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: Erlangen MTB variants

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, Erlangen MTB variants, missense_concordance; subgroup values correspond to Supplemental Table S6
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: Erlangen MTB variants
Dataset: Erlangen MTB variants
82.5% Percent agreement (gene role: oncogene)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: Erlangen MTB variants

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, Erlangen MTB variants, oncogene_concordance; subgroup values correspond to Supplemental Table S6
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: Erlangen MTB variants
Dataset: Erlangen MTB variants
79% Percent agreement (oncogenic vs pathogenic)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: Erlangen MTB variants

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, Erlangen MTB variants, oncogenic_vs_pathogenic_concordance; subgroup values correspond to Supplemental Table S6
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: Erlangen MTB variants
Dataset: Erlangen MTB variants
49.4% Percent agreement (variant type: truncating)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: Erlangen MTB variants

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, Erlangen MTB variants, truncating_concordance; subgroup values correspond to Supplemental Table S6
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: Erlangen MTB variants
Dataset: Erlangen MTB variants
76% Percent agreement (gene role: tumour suppressor)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: Erlangen MTB variants

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, Erlangen MTB variants, tsg_concordance; subgroup values correspond to Supplemental Table S6
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: Erlangen MTB variants
Dataset: Erlangen MTB variants
97% Percent agreement (class: VUS)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: Erlangen MTB variants

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, Erlangen MTB variants, vus_concordance; subgroup values correspond to Supplemental Table S6
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: Guideline SOP variants
Dataset: Guideline SOP variants
81% Accuracy
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: Guideline SOP variants

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, Guideline SOP variants, accuracy; subgroup values correspond to Supplemental Table S6
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: Guideline SOP variants
Dataset: Guideline SOP variants
83% Recall (class: benign)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: Guideline SOP variants

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, Guideline SOP variants, benign_sensitivity; subgroup values correspond to Supplemental Table S6
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: Guideline SOP variants
Dataset: Guideline SOP variants
83.1% Accuracy (variant type: missense)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: Guideline SOP variants

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, Guideline SOP variants, missense_accuracy; subgroup values correspond to Supplemental Table S6
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: Guideline SOP variants
Dataset: Guideline SOP variants
82% Accuracy (gene role: oncogene)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: Guideline SOP variants

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, Guideline SOP variants, oncogene_accuracy; subgroup values correspond to Supplemental Table S6
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: Guideline SOP variants
Dataset: Guideline SOP variants
88% Recall (class: oncogenic)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: Guideline SOP variants

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, Guideline SOP variants, oncogenic_sensitivity; subgroup values correspond to Supplemental Table S6
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: Guideline SOP variants
Dataset: Guideline SOP variants
0.87 Correlation (correlation type not stated)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: Guideline SOP variants

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, Figure 2B, concordant variants only
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: Guideline SOP variants
Dataset: Guideline SOP variants
77.7% Accuracy (variant type: truncating)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: Guideline SOP variants

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, Guideline SOP variants, truncating_accuracy; subgroup values correspond to Supplemental Table S6
Configuration: OncoVI 2026 publication configurationProtocol: OncoVI three-class assessment: Guideline SOP variants
Dataset: Guideline SOP variants
87.1% Accuracy (gene role: tumour suppressor)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: not reported for this endpoint

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OncoVI: Guideline SOP variants

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology · Results, Guideline SOP variants, tsg_accuracy; subgroup values correspond to Supplemental Table S6

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5.

Use this configuration

How it works, versions and access

Related profile: Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI). This page retains the exact record and its evaluation context.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

2 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Facets: method types
1 values
  • conventional_pipeline
Individual claims
Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology

Original source ↗

OncoVI Methods: "an IF-ELSE implementation" of the points-based SOP

Version: 2026 final full text in Europe PMC XML
Retrieved: 2026-09-30T21:23:41Z

conflicting claim

["source-hash-verification","automated-source-review"] · 2026-10-12

Audit details

Correct the method type from none to conventional_pipeline (use-case baseline review 2026-10-12, table 2). Evidence from docs/reviews/use-cases/baselines-2026-10-12.md. Independent review 2026-10-12: approved. See docs/reviews/2026-10-12-method-type-corrections.md.

Conflicting source claim: "[\"conventional_pipeline\"]". Claim record status: source_checked.

Field: facets.method_types

Claim: metadata-correction-tags-20261012-a9026b69570b068ac543

Source artifact SHA-256: 1ced323acfac29704bccfd990cc57692770c324ae598983c6973d271aaaf48b2

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Extraction artifact SHA-256: 69ac0b1ef3902b1cb6461c87117db1af4b2035e6a84ab602b0c1d02fc898d28d

Extraction artifact

Relationship: configuration of
uc-clinical-20260930-method-oncovi
Individual claims
Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology

Original source ↗

Methods and OncoVI implementation

Version: 2026 final full text in Europe PMC XML
Retrieved: 2026-09-30T21:23:41Z

source checked

["automated-source-review"] · 2026-09-30

Audit details

Transcription from inspected primary source. No execution, independent replication or human scientific review.

Field: links:configuration_of:uc-clinical-20260930-method-oncovi

Claim: uc-clinical-20260930-association-oncovi-study

Source artifact SHA-256: 1ced323acfac29704bccfd990cc57692770c324ae598983c6973d271aaaf48b2

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: uc-clinical-20260930-oncovi-study

areas
dna-genomes
contexts
clinical_research
method types
conventional_pipeline
review
method: automated-source-review; reviewer: codex; date: 2026-09-30; note: Transcription from inspected primary source. No execution, independent replication or human scientific review.; source id: uc-clinical-20260930-source-oncovi; reviewer note: role: clinical coverage worker
missing metadata
software commit: reason: unextracted
limitations
Some references include ClinVar pathogenicity; independence from labels requires audit.
parent identity review
source id: uc-clinical-20260930-source-oncovi; source locator: Methods and OncoVI implementation; method: automated_source_review
Related records

Suggest a correction