rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Configuration

SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)

SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021) as run in the cited comparison.

3 evaluations · 33 results

Overview

SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021) as run in the cited comparison.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

3 evaluations · 33 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 4)
Dataset: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
94% accuracy
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on ABCA4 deep-intronic variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-di

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 4 row 'SpliceAI', column 'Accuracy (%)'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 4)
Dataset: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
2 false-negative-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on ABCA4 deep-intronic variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-di

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 4 row 'SpliceAI', column 'FN'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 4)
Dataset: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
3 false-positive-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on ABCA4 deep-intronic variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-di

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 4 row 'SpliceAI', column 'FP'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 4)
Dataset: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
0.84 matthews-correlation-coefficient
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on ABCA4 deep-intronic variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-di

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 4 row 'SpliceAI', column 'MCC'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 4)
Dataset: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
0 count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on ABCA4 deep-intronic variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-di

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 4 row 'SpliceAI', column 'Missing values'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 4)
Dataset: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
97% negative-predictive-value
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on ABCA4 deep-intronic variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-di

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 4 row 'SpliceAI', column 'NPV (%)'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 4)
Dataset: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
86% precision
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on ABCA4 deep-intronic variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-di

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 4 row 'SpliceAI', column 'PPV (%)'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 4)
Dataset: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
90% recall
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on ABCA4 deep-intronic variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-di

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 4 row 'SpliceAI', column 'Sensitivity (%)'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 4)
Dataset: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
95% specificity
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on ABCA4 deep-intronic variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-di

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 4 row 'SpliceAI', column 'Specificity (%)'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 4)
Dataset: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
57 true-negative-count
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on ABCA4 deep-intronic variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-di

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 4 row 'SpliceAI', column 'TN'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 4)
Dataset: ABCA4 deep-intronic variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
19 true-positive-count
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on ABCA4 deep-intronic variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-di

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 4 row 'SpliceAI', column 'TP'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 3)
Dataset: ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
79% accuracy
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-ncss

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 3 row 'SpliceAI', column 'Accuracy (%)'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 3)
Dataset: ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
14 false-negative-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-ncss

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 3 row 'SpliceAI', column 'FN'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 3)
Dataset: ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
1 false-positive-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-ncss

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 3 row 'SpliceAI', column 'FP'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 3)
Dataset: ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
0.42 matthews-correlation-coefficient
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-ncss

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 3 row 'SpliceAI', column 'MCC'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 3)
Dataset: ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
0 count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-ncss

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 3 row 'SpliceAI', column 'Missing values'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 3)
Dataset: ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
30% negative-predictive-value
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-ncss

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 3 row 'SpliceAI', column 'NPV (%)'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 3)
Dataset: ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
98% precision
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-ncss

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 3 row 'SpliceAI', column 'PPV (%)'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 3)
Dataset: ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
78% recall
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-ncss

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 3 row 'SpliceAI', column 'Sensitivity (%)'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 3)
Dataset: ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
86% specificity
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-ncss

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 3 row 'SpliceAI', column 'Specificity (%)'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 3)
Dataset: ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
6 true-negative-count
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-ncss

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 3 row 'SpliceAI', column 'TN'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 3)
Dataset: ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
50 true-positive-count
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on ABCA4 noncanonical splice-site variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-abca4-ncss

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 3 row 'SpliceAI', column 'TP'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: MYBPC3 noncanonical splice-site variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 5)
Dataset: MYBPC3 noncanonical splice-site variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
67% accuracy
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on MYBPC3 noncanonical splice-site variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-mybpc3-ncss

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 5 row 'SpliceAI', column 'Accuracy (%)'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: MYBPC3 noncanonical splice-site variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 5)
Dataset: MYBPC3 noncanonical splice-site variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
12 false-negative-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on MYBPC3 noncanonical splice-site variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-mybpc3-ncss

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 5 row 'SpliceAI', column 'FN'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)Protocol: MYBPC3 noncanonical splice-site variants: classification against mini- or midigene splicing results (Riepe et al. Table 5)
Dataset: MYBPC3 noncanonical splice-site variants (Riepe et al. benchmark set)
8 false-positive-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on MYBPC3 noncanonical splice-site variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-riepe2021-mybpc3-ncss

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays · Table 5 row 'SpliceAI', column 'FP'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc.

Use this model

How it works, versions and access
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: splicing-follow-up-20261009-config-riepe2021-spliceai-1-3-1

areas
dna-genomes
contexts
research
method types
supervised_machine_learning
reported name
SpliceAI (Riepe et al. 2021)
foundation model eligible
false
version
v1.3.1
parameters
Classification cutoff per data set; Table 2 prints the ROC-optimal thresholds, and Tables 3-5 do not restate which cutoff was applied
source locator
Methods 'In silico splice prediction tools'; Table 2
Related records

Suggest a correction