STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026)
STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review: Whole RNA-seq fusion workflow.
Overview
An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.
Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.
Evaluations and results
1 evaluation · 83 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Filter evaluations
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 80.8% Percent agreement (overall, 104 fusion detection results in 101 patients) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Results 'Fusion gene detection performance of RNA-seq compared with that of conventional diagnostic methods' paragraph 1: 'The overall concordance rate between RNA-seq and conventional diagnostics was 80.8%.' |
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 21.4% False positive rate (overall, 56 fusion-negative results by conventional diagnostics; RNA-seq-only fusions counted as errors, though the authors describe several as well-known recurrent fusions and confirmed one by RT-PCR and Sanger sequencing) percent · lower Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Results 'Fusion gene detection performance of RNA-seq compared with that of conventional diagnostic methods' paragraph 1: 'among 56 fusion-negative results based on conventional diagnostics, RNA-seq helped identify 12 fusion genes (21.4%, reflecting 1 – specificity)' |
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 83.3% Recall (overall, 48 fusions detected by conventional diagnostics) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Results 'Fusion gene detection performance of RNA-seq compared with that of conventional diagnostic methods' paragraph 1: 'Of the 48 fusion genes detected using conventional diagnostics, RNA-seq helped identify 40 and missed eight (83.3% sensitivity)' |
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 86.4% Recall (AML patients, fusions detected by conventional diagnostics) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Discussion paragraph 2: 'with a fusion detection sensitivity of 83.3%, comparable across AML (86.4%) and B-ALL (87.0%)' |
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 87% Recall (B-ALL patients, fusions detected by conventional diagnostics) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Discussion paragraph 2: 'with a fusion detection sensitivity of 83.3%, comparable across AML (86.4%) and B-ALL (87.0%)' |
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 81% Percent agreement (BCR::ABL1 (conventional-positive; AML, B-ALL)) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Table 2, section 'Fusion genes detected using conventional diagnostics', row 'BCR::ABL1', column 'Concordance, %' |
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 16 Count (BCR::ABL1 (conventional-positive; AML, B-ALL)) count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Table 2, section 'Fusion genes detected using conventional diagnostics', row 'BCR::ABL1', column 'Number of fusions detected using conventional diagnostics' |
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 13 True positives (BCR::ABL1 (conventional-positive; AML, B-ALL)) count · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Table 2, section 'Fusion genes detected using conventional diagnostics', row 'BCR::ABL1', column 'Number of fusions detected using RNA-seq' |
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 100% Percent agreement (CBFB::MYH11 (conventional-positive; AML)) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Table 2, section 'Fusion genes detected using conventional diagnostics', row 'CBFB::MYH11', column 'Concordance, %' |
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 6 Count (CBFB::MYH11 (conventional-positive; AML)) count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Table 2, section 'Fusion genes detected using conventional diagnostics', row 'CBFB::MYH11', column 'Number of fusions detected using conventional diagnostics' |
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 6 True positives (CBFB::MYH11 (conventional-positive; AML)) count · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Table 2, section 'Fusion genes detected using conventional diagnostics', row 'CBFB::MYH11', column 'Number of fusions detected using RNA-seq' |
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 100% Percent agreement (DEK::NUP214 (conventional-positive; AML)) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Table 2, section 'Fusion genes detected using conventional diagnostics', row 'DEK::NUP214', column 'Concordance, %' |
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 1 Count (DEK::NUP214 (conventional-positive; AML)) count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Table 2, section 'Fusion genes detected using conventional diagnostics', row 'DEK::NUP214', column 'Number of fusions detected using conventional diagnostics' |
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 1 True positives (DEK::NUP214 (conventional-positive; AML)) count · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Table 2, section 'Fusion genes detected using conventional diagnostics', row 'DEK::NUP214', column 'Number of fusions detected using RNA-seq' |
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 0% Percent agreement (ETV6::NCOA2 (RNA-seq only; MPAL)) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Table 2, section 'Fusion genes detected using RNA-seq only', row 'ETV6::NCOA2', column 'Concordance, %' |
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 0 Count (ETV6::NCOA2 (RNA-seq only; MPAL)) count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Table 2, section 'Fusion genes detected using RNA-seq only', row 'ETV6::NCOA2', column 'Number of fusions detected using conventional diagnostics' |
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 1 Count (ETV6::NCOA2 (RNA-seq only; MPAL)) count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Table 2, section 'Fusion genes detected using RNA-seq only', row 'ETV6::NCOA2', column 'Number of fusions detected using RNA-seq' |
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 67% Percent agreement (ETV6::RUNX1 (conventional-positive; B-ALL)) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Table 2, section 'Fusion genes detected using conventional diagnostics', row 'ETV6::RUNX1', column 'Concordance, %' |
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 3 Count (ETV6::RUNX1 (conventional-positive; B-ALL)) count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Table 2, section 'Fusion genes detected using conventional diagnostics', row 'ETV6::RUNX1', column 'Number of fusions detected using conventional diagnostics' |
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 2 True positives (ETV6::RUNX1 (conventional-positive; B-ALL)) count · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Table 2, section 'Fusion genes detected using conventional diagnostics', row 'ETV6::RUNX1', column 'Number of fusions detected using RNA-seq' |
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 0% Percent agreement (FUS::ZNF362 (RNA-seq only; B-ALL)) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Table 2, section 'Fusion genes detected using RNA-seq only', row 'FUS::ZNF362', column 'Concordance, %' |
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 0 Count (FUS::ZNF362 (RNA-seq only; B-ALL)) count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Table 2, section 'Fusion genes detected using RNA-seq only', row 'FUS::ZNF362', column 'Number of fusions detected using conventional diagnostics' |
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 1 Count (FUS::ZNF362 (RNA-seq only; B-ALL)) count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Table 2, section 'Fusion genes detected using RNA-seq only', row 'FUS::ZNF362', column 'Number of fusions detected using RNA-seq' |
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 0% Percent agreement (HNRNPH1::ERG (RNA-seq only; AML)) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Table 2, section 'Fusion genes detected using RNA-seq only', row 'HNRNPH1::ERG', column 'Concordance, %' |
| Configuration: STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) | Protocol: Acute leukaemia whole RNA-seq fusion detection against conventional diagnostics (Kim et al. 2026) Dataset: Samsung Medical Center acute leukaemia bone-marrow whole RNA-seq, 101 patients (2022-2023) | 0 Count (HNRNPH1::ERG (RNA-seq only; AML)) count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-protocol-conventional-diagnostics Aggregation: Not reported Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Table 2, section 'Fusion genes detected using RNA-seq only', row 'HNRNPH1::ERG', column 'Number of fusions detected using conventional diagnostics' |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.
Use this configuration
How it works, versions and access
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
1 evidence row matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Name STAR 2.7.7a and Arriba v2.4.0 high-confidence calls with manual IGV review (Kim et al. 2026) Individual claims | Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia Crossref record for 10.3343/alm.2025.0300 (volume 46, issue 3, pages 257-269, print 2026-05-01); Lin et al. 2026 dataset records (mean 1.4 M and 11.2 M reads) Version: Annals of Laboratory Medicine 46(3), epub 2025-10-16; PMC13071280 full-text XML | source checked ["automated-source-review"] · 2026-10-12 Audit detailsCorrect the citation year for Kim et al. (Ann Lab Med 2026;46(3):257-269, published online 2025-10-16) and the Lin depth ratio (1.4 M against 11.2 M mean reads is about one eighth, not one tenth). Historical releases retain the previous value. Independent review 2026-10-12: correct as made. Field: Claim: metadata-correction-qa-20261012-728c4bbbf59e272982e7 Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
Sources and history
Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked
1 source record and release history
- Detection of Fusion Genes Using RNA Sequencing in Acute Leukemia · Original source · Annals of Laboratory Medicine 46(3), epub 2025-10-16; PMC13071280 full-text XML
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: rna-fusion-leukaemia-20261011-config-arriba-2-4-0-igv-review
- areas
- rna-transcriptomes
- contexts
- clinical_research
- method types
- conventional_pipeline
- reported name
- Arriba
- version
- v2.4.0
- foundation model eligible
- false
- parameters
- Trimmomatic 0.39; STAR 2.7.7a to GRCh37; Arriba v2.4.0 keeping high-confidence in-frame fusions and high-confidence fusions involving MECOM, IGH, IGK, IGL, TRA, TRB, TRD or TRG; every call manually checked in IGV 2.16.0
- access reuse
- Public open-source software plus manual review
- source locator
- Methods 'RNA-seq and fusion gene detection'
- provenance note
- Whole RNA-seq fusion workflow as run in the cited clinical comparison.