rewire.itbenchmarks
Configuration

Boltz-2

This configuration predicts ligand poses for the SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV main proteases in the ASAP challenge setting.

SourcesA Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases · Conclusions (paragraph 1); Introduction (paragraph 2)

1 evaluation · 1 result

How it worksEvaluated procedure (conceptual)
Evaluated procedure (conceptual)1. Main-protease protein information and ligand structures/SMILES. Then: 2. Boltz-2. Then: 3. Predicted ligand binding posesEvaluated procedure (conceptual)1. Main-protease protein information and ligand structures/SMILES. Then: 2. Boltz-2. Then: 3. Predicted ligand binding posesEvaluated procedure (conceptual)1. Main-protease protein information and ligand structures/SMILES. Then: 2. Boltz-2. Then: 3. Predicted ligand binding poses

Conceptual input–method–output guide. Check the procedure text and linked evaluation for fitted components, additional inputs and exact settings.

SourcesA Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases · Methodologies/Potency Prediction/LRIP-SF/Pose Generation (paragraph 1); Results/Potency Prediction (paragraph 3)

Overview

Model type

Biomolecular structure predictor; this record is the paper-specific evaluated configuration.

Sourcesjwohlwend/boltz README.md · README.md model description

limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-23. All specifications and missing details

Evaluations and results

1 evaluation · 1 result. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: Boltz-2Task: Ligand potency prediction using generated poses
Dataset: SARS-CoV-2 Mpro ligands
0.8 Pearson R
unitless · unknown

Uncertainty: ± 0.027

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Boltz-2: Ligand potency prediction using generated poses

Potency prediction using Boltz-2 ligand-pose generation protocol; see paper scoring pipeline.

Aggregation: Not reported

A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases · Table 3, Boltz-2 row, Pearson’s R column

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220.

Use this model

How it works, versions and access

Related profile: Boltz-2. This page retains the exact record and its evaluation context.

How it works

How the evaluated method works

Boltz-2 is the co-folding pose-generation comparator; downstream LRIP-SF affinity fitting is separate from this row.

SourcesA Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases · Methodologies/Potency Prediction/LRIP-SF/Pose Generation (paragraph 1); Results/Potency Prediction (paragraph 3)
Underlying method and version boundaries

The official Boltz repository publishes separate Boltz-1 and Boltz-2 models. Boltz-2 adds affinity prediction and other changes; these are not retroactively attributed to Boltz-1 evaluations.

Sourcesjwohlwend/boltz README.md · README.md; introduction, model description, pretrained-model and usage sections at pinned revision
What was evaluated

The linked evaluation record identifies Boltz-2: Ligand potency prediction using generated poses. Its dataset, split, adaptation and evidence origin remain attached to the reported results.

SourcesA Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases · The named evaluation’s methods and comparison table; exact preserved evaluation IDs: evaluation-lit-047
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Strengths and limitations

Profile review details

Follow-up review of Known versions / configuration, Checkpoint identity. Source locations and before/after decisions are recorded in the 23 September profile-evidence audit. Other explanatory content retains its earlier source scope. No human scientific review or independent reproduction is implied.

Stable record: reported-model-cdc9aabf4efc04

Specifications

Inputs, training, access and other details

Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-23. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.

Inputs, outputs and configuration
PropertyDescription and evidence
Model typeBiomolecular structure predictor; this record is the paper-specific evaluated configuration.
Sourcesjwohlwend/boltz README.md · README.md model description
Architecture / procedureBoltz-2 is the co-folding pose-generation comparator; downstream LRIP-SF affinity fitting is separate from this row.
SourcesA Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases · Methodologies/Potency Prediction/LRIP-SF/Pose Generation (paragraph 1); Results/Potency Prediction (paragraph 3)
Biological inputsMain-protease protein information and ligand structures/SMILES
SourcesA Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases · Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with DiffDock (paragraph 1); Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with Boltz-2 (paragraph 1)
OutputsPredicted ligand binding poses
SourcesA Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases · Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with Gnina (paragraph 2); Methodologies/Potency Prediction/LRIP-SF/Pose Generation (paragraph 2)
ParametersAn aggregate parameter total for this exact evaluated configuration is not established by the inspected sources. · Not reported in inspected sources
Sources (2)A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases; jwohlwend/boltz README.md · Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Data Preparation; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Molecular Docking with Glide; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Molecular Docking with AutoDock Vina; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Flexible Ligand Superposition with FlexS; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with AlphaFold3; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with DiffDock; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with Boltz-2; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with Gnina; inspected for aggregate parameter count (component sizes are not added without an exact configuration); README.md at pinned repository revision
Known versions / configurationThe study used pretrained Boltz-2 with target amino-acid sequence, an MSA from the official server, and ligand SMILES. Its diffusion sampling parameter was 10; poses were ranked by internal confidence and the top-ranked pose retained. The section does not identify an immutable weight or software revision.
SourcesA Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases · Methods section2.1.7, XML sec2.1.7, Deep Learning-Based Modeling with Boltz-2.
Training data / fittingThe study contains 770 SARS-CoV-2 training complexes and test sets of 98 SARS-CoV-2 and 97 MERS-CoV complexes; these are study partitions, not necessarily upstream-model training corpora.
SourcesA Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases · Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Data Preparation (paragraph 2); Results/Potency Prediction (paragraph 5)
Context limitsA maximum input/context length for this exact evaluated configuration is not established by the inspected sources. · Not reported in inspected sources
Sources (2)A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases; jwohlwend/boltz README.md · Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Data Preparation; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Molecular Docking with Glide; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Molecular Docking with AutoDock Vina; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Flexible Ligand Superposition with FlexS; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with AlphaFold3; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with DiffDock; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with Boltz-2; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with Gnina; inspected for explicit maximum input length (dataset lengths and family-wide limits are not substituted); README.md at pinned repository revision
AccessOfficial upstream implementation and usage documentation: https://github.com/jwohlwend/boltz/blob/b1ebfc46ecf57f5414e0d1a6f9027bbb122c53bc/README.md. This pinned documentation revision is not automatically the evaluated weight revision.
Sourcesjwohlwend/boltz README.md · README.md; installation, model download and usage instructions
Code licenceMIT (upstream repository code at the cited revision; this does not establish every dependency or historical checkpoint licence).
Sourcesjwohlwend/boltz LICENSE · LICENSE; complete licence text
Weights licenceMIT for all code and model weights, explicitly stated in the official Boltz README. Historical evaluated weight identity remains separately recorded.
Sourcesjwohlwend/boltz README.md · README.md; license and model release introduction
Checkpoint identityThe inspected Methods section identifies Boltz-2 and its sampling/ranking procedure but supplies no checkpoint checksum or immutable software revision. Current family documentation cannot fill this historical evaluation gap. · Not reported in inspected sources
SourcesA Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases · Methods section2.1.7, XML sec2.1.7.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

24 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Diagram caption
Conceptual input–method–output guide. Check the procedure text and linked evaluation for fitted components, additional inputs and exact settings.
Individual claims
A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases

Original source ↗

Methodologies/Potency Prediction/LRIP-SF/Pose Generation (paragraph 1); Results/Potency Prediction (paragraph 3)

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.557756+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-23

Audit details

Follow-up review of Known versions / configuration, Checkpoint identity. Source locations and before/after decisions are recorded in the 23 September profile-evidence audit. Other explanatory content retains its earlier source scope. No human scientific review or independent reproduction is implied.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.caption

Source artifact SHA-256: c356a1c65a0033e5ae18a05d4afab5495856c5b6869328ff49e13547a4801a57

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Diagram steps
  • Main-protease protein information and ligand structures/SMILES
  • Boltz-2
  • Predicted ligand binding poses
Individual claims
A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases

Original source ↗

Methodologies/Potency Prediction/LRIP-SF/Pose Generation (paragraph 1); Results/Potency Prediction (paragraph 3)

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.557756+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-23

Audit details

Follow-up review of Known versions / configuration, Checkpoint identity. Source locations and before/after decisions are recorded in the 23 September profile-evidence audit. Other explanatory content retains its earlier source scope. No human scientific review or independent reproduction is implied.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.steps

Source artifact SHA-256: c356a1c65a0033e5ae18a05d4afab5495856c5b6869328ff49e13547a4801a57

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Diagram title
Evaluated procedure (conceptual)
Individual claims
A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases

Original source ↗

Methodologies/Potency Prediction/LRIP-SF/Pose Generation (paragraph 1); Results/Potency Prediction (paragraph 3)

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.557756+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-23

Audit details

Follow-up review of Known versions / configuration, Checkpoint identity. Source locations and before/after decisions are recorded in the 23 September profile-evidence audit. Other explanatory content retains its earlier source scope. No human scientific review or independent reproduction is implied.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.title

Source artifact SHA-256: c356a1c65a0033e5ae18a05d4afab5495856c5b6869328ff49e13547a4801a57

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Model type
Biomolecular structure predictor; this record is the paper-specific evaluated configuration.
Individual claims
jwohlwend/boltz README.md

Original source ↗

README.md model description

Version: b1ebfc46ecf57f5414e0d1a6f9027bbb122c53bc
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T20:30:16.575839+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-23

Audit details

Follow-up review of Known versions / configuration, Checkpoint identity. Source locations and before/after decisions are recorded in the 23 September profile-evidence audit. Other explanatory content retains its earlier source scope. No human scientific review or independent reproduction is implied.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.0.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 79149435313841e6f9cc0c8b581259f3952a2469cbe6f9a733f7143b557025c2

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Architecture / procedure
Boltz-2 is the co-folding pose-generation comparator; downstream LRIP-SF affinity fitting is separate from this row.
Individual claims
A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases

Original source ↗

Methodologies/Potency Prediction/LRIP-SF/Pose Generation (paragraph 1); Results/Potency Prediction (paragraph 3)

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.557756+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-23

Audit details

Follow-up review of Known versions / configuration, Checkpoint identity. Source locations and before/after decisions are recorded in the 23 September profile-evidence audit. Other explanatory content retains its earlier source scope. No human scientific review or independent reproduction is implied.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.1.value

Source artifact SHA-256: c356a1c65a0033e5ae18a05d4afab5495856c5b6869328ff49e13547a4801a57

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Weights licence
MIT for all code and model weights, explicitly stated in the official Boltz README. Historical evaluated weight identity remains separately recorded.
Individual claims
jwohlwend/boltz README.md

Original source ↗

README.md; license and model release introduction

Version: b1ebfc46ecf57f5414e0d1a6f9027bbb122c53bc
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T20:30:16.575839+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-23

Audit details

Follow-up review of Known versions / configuration, Checkpoint identity. Source locations and before/after decisions are recorded in the 23 September profile-evidence audit. Other explanatory content retains its earlier source scope. No human scientific review or independent reproduction is implied.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.10.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 79149435313841e6f9cc0c8b581259f3952a2469cbe6f9a733f7143b557025c2

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Checkpoint identity
The inspected Methods section identifies Boltz-2 and its sampling/ranking procedure but supplies no checkpoint checksum or immutable software revision. Current family documentation cannot fill this historical evaluation gap.
Individual claims
A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases

Original source ↗

Methods section2.1.7, XML sec2.1.7.

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.557756+00:00

unreported

automated source review · 2026-09-23

Audit details

Follow-up review of Known versions / configuration, Checkpoint identity. Source locations and before/after decisions are recorded in the 23 September profile-evidence audit. Other explanatory content retains its earlier source scope. No human scientific review or independent reproduction is implied.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.11.value

Source artifact SHA-256: c356a1c65a0033e5ae18a05d4afab5495856c5b6869328ff49e13547a4801a57

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Biological inputs
Main-protease protein information and ligand structures/SMILES
Individual claims
A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases

Original source ↗

Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with DiffDock (paragraph 1); Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with Boltz-2 (paragraph 1)

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.557756+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-23

Audit details

Follow-up review of Known versions / configuration, Checkpoint identity. Source locations and before/after decisions are recorded in the 23 September profile-evidence audit. Other explanatory content retains its earlier source scope. No human scientific review or independent reproduction is implied.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.2.value

Source artifact SHA-256: c356a1c65a0033e5ae18a05d4afab5495856c5b6869328ff49e13547a4801a57

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Outputs
Predicted ligand binding poses
Individual claims
A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases

Original source ↗

Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with Gnina (paragraph 2); Methodologies/Potency Prediction/LRIP-SF/Pose Generation (paragraph 2)

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.557756+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-23

Audit details

Follow-up review of Known versions / configuration, Checkpoint identity. Source locations and before/after decisions are recorded in the 23 September profile-evidence audit. Other explanatory content retains its earlier source scope. No human scientific review or independent reproduction is implied.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.3.value

Source artifact SHA-256: c356a1c65a0033e5ae18a05d4afab5495856c5b6869328ff49e13547a4801a57

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Parameters
An aggregate parameter total for this exact evaluated configuration is not established by the inspected sources.
Individual claims
jwohlwend/boltz README.md

Original source ↗

Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Data Preparation; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Molecular Docking with Glide; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Molecular Docking with AutoDock Vina; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Flexible Ligand Superposition with FlexS; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with AlphaFold3; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with DiffDock; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with Boltz-2; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with Gnina; inspected for aggregate parameter count (component sizes are not added without an exact configuration); README.md at pinned repository revision

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: b1ebfc46ecf57f5414e0d1a6f9027bbb122c53bc
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T20:30:16.575839+00:00

unreported

automated source review · 2026-09-23

Audit details

Follow-up review of Known versions / configuration, Checkpoint identity. Source locations and before/after decisions are recorded in the 23 September profile-evidence audit. Other explanatory content retains its earlier source scope. No human scientific review or independent reproduction is implied.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.4.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 79149435313841e6f9cc0c8b581259f3952a2469cbe6f9a733f7143b557025c2

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: needs review

3 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: reported-model-cdc9aabf4efc04

areas
molecular-interactions
entity level
method
version
Not reported
reported name
Boltz-2
historical missing metadata
version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; checkpoint revision: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; training data: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; licence: not_reported_in_legacy_extract
metadata review scope
historical_missing_metadata preserves the original discovery state. Current descriptive evidence and missingness are recorded in profile.facts; numerical-result review is separate.
legacy kinds
model
entity classification
review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: This source-scoped entry preserves the method/configuration actually named in an evaluation. It is neither a global family identity nor proof of an immutable checkpoint; the linked evaluation retains adaptation, fitting and scoring details.; source ids: mpro-pose-affinity-2025; evidence-reported-base-boltz-readme-md; source locator: Methodologies/Potency Prediction/LRIP-SF/Pose Generation (paragraph 1); Results/Potency Prediction (paragraph 3) | README.md model description | Conclusions (paragraph 1); Introduction (paragraph 2); ambiguities: Configuration means the source-labelled evaluated identity. It does not establish missing checkpoint hashes, default settings or equivalence to same-named records in other papers.
Related records

Suggest a correction