Model type
Biomolecular structure predictor; this record is the paper-specific evaluated configuration.
This configuration predicts ligand poses for the SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV main proteases in the ASAP challenge setting.
Conceptual input–method–output guide. Check the procedure text and linked evaluation for fitted components, additional inputs and exact settings.
Biomolecular structure predictor; this record is the paper-specific evaluated configuration.
Main-protease protein information and ligand structures/SMILES
Predicted ligand binding poses
Official upstream implementation and usage documentation: https://github.com/jwohlwend/boltz/blob/b1ebfc46ecf57f5414e0d1a6f9027bbb122c53bc/README.md. This pinned documentation revision is not automatically the evaluated weight revision.
limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-23. All specifications and missing details
1 evaluation · 1 result. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: Boltz-2 | Task: Ligand potency prediction using generated poses Dataset: SARS-CoV-2 Mpro ligands | 0.8 Pearson R unitless · unknown Uncertainty: ± 0.027 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBoltz-2: Ligand potency prediction using generated poses Potency prediction using Boltz-2 ligand-pose generation protocol; see paper scoring pipeline. Aggregation: Not reported A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases · Table 3, Boltz-2 row, Pearson’s R column |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220.
Related profile: Boltz-2. This page retains the exact record and its evaluation context.
Boltz-2 is the co-folding pose-generation comparator; downstream LRIP-SF affinity fitting is separate from this row.
The official Boltz repository publishes separate Boltz-1 and Boltz-2 models. Boltz-2 adds affinity prediction and other changes; these are not retroactively attributed to Boltz-1 evaluations.
The linked evaluation record identifies Boltz-2: Ligand potency prediction using generated poses. Its dataset, split, adaptation and evidence origin remain attached to the reported results.
Follow-up review of Known versions / configuration, Checkpoint identity. Source locations and before/after decisions are recorded in the 23 September profile-evidence audit. Other explanatory content retains its earlier source scope. No human scientific review or independent reproduction is implied.
Stable record: reported-model-cdc9aabf4efc04Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-23. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.
| Property | Description and evidence |
|---|---|
| Model type | Biomolecular structure predictor; this record is the paper-specific evaluated configuration.Sourcesjwohlwend/boltz README.md · README.md model description |
| Architecture / procedure | Boltz-2 is the co-folding pose-generation comparator; downstream LRIP-SF affinity fitting is separate from this row.SourcesA Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases · Methodologies/Potency Prediction/LRIP-SF/Pose Generation (paragraph 1); Results/Potency Prediction (paragraph 3) |
| Biological inputs | Main-protease protein information and ligand structures/SMILESSourcesA Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases · Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with DiffDock (paragraph 1); Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with Boltz-2 (paragraph 1) |
| Outputs | Predicted ligand binding posesSourcesA Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases · Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with Gnina (paragraph 2); Methodologies/Potency Prediction/LRIP-SF/Pose Generation (paragraph 2) |
| Parameters | An aggregate parameter total for this exact evaluated configuration is not established by the inspected sources. · Not reported in inspected sourcesSources (2)A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases; jwohlwend/boltz README.md · Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Data Preparation; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Molecular Docking with Glide; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Molecular Docking with AutoDock Vina; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Flexible Ligand Superposition with FlexS; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with AlphaFold3; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with DiffDock; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with Boltz-2; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with Gnina; inspected for aggregate parameter count (component sizes are not added without an exact configuration); README.md at pinned repository revision |
| Known versions / configuration | The study used pretrained Boltz-2 with target amino-acid sequence, an MSA from the official server, and ligand SMILES. Its diffusion sampling parameter was 10; poses were ranked by internal confidence and the top-ranked pose retained. The section does not identify an immutable weight or software revision.SourcesA Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases · Methods section2.1.7, XML sec2.1.7, Deep Learning-Based Modeling with Boltz-2. |
| Training data / fitting | The study contains 770 SARS-CoV-2 training complexes and test sets of 98 SARS-CoV-2 and 97 MERS-CoV complexes; these are study partitions, not necessarily upstream-model training corpora.SourcesA Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases · Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Data Preparation (paragraph 2); Results/Potency Prediction (paragraph 5) |
| Context limits | A maximum input/context length for this exact evaluated configuration is not established by the inspected sources. · Not reported in inspected sourcesSources (2)A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases; jwohlwend/boltz README.md · Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Data Preparation; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Molecular Docking with Glide; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Molecular Docking with AutoDock Vina; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Flexible Ligand Superposition with FlexS; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with AlphaFold3; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with DiffDock; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with Boltz-2; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with Gnina; inspected for explicit maximum input length (dataset lengths and family-wide limits are not substituted); README.md at pinned repository revision |
| Access | Official upstream implementation and usage documentation: https://github.com/jwohlwend/boltz/blob/b1ebfc46ecf57f5414e0d1a6f9027bbb122c53bc/README.md. This pinned documentation revision is not automatically the evaluated weight revision.Sourcesjwohlwend/boltz README.md · README.md; installation, model download and usage instructions |
| Code licence | MIT (upstream repository code at the cited revision; this does not establish every dependency or historical checkpoint licence).Sourcesjwohlwend/boltz LICENSE · LICENSE; complete licence text |
| Weights licence | MIT for all code and model weights, explicitly stated in the official Boltz README. Historical evaluated weight identity remains separately recorded.Sourcesjwohlwend/boltz README.md · README.md; license and model release introduction |
| Checkpoint identity | The inspected Methods section identifies Boltz-2 and its sampling/ranking procedure but supplies no checkpoint checksum or immutable software revision. Current family documentation cannot fill this historical evaluation gap. · Not reported in inspected sourcesSourcesA Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases · Methods section2.1.7, XML sec2.1.7. |
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
24 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Diagram caption Conceptual input–method–output guide. Check the procedure text and linked evaluation for fitted components, additional inputs and exact settings. Individual claims | A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases Methodologies/Potency Prediction/LRIP-SF/Pose Generation (paragraph 1); Results/Potency Prediction (paragraph 3) Version: version of record | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-23 Audit detailsFollow-up review of Known versions / configuration, Checkpoint identity. Source locations and before/after decisions are recorded in the 23 September profile-evidence audit. Other explanatory content retains its earlier source scope. No human scientific review or independent reproduction is implied. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
Diagram steps
| A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases Methodologies/Potency Prediction/LRIP-SF/Pose Generation (paragraph 1); Results/Potency Prediction (paragraph 3) Version: version of record | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-23 Audit detailsFollow-up review of Known versions / configuration, Checkpoint identity. Source locations and before/after decisions are recorded in the 23 September profile-evidence audit. Other explanatory content retains its earlier source scope. No human scientific review or independent reproduction is implied. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Diagram title Evaluated procedure (conceptual) Individual claims | A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases Methodologies/Potency Prediction/LRIP-SF/Pose Generation (paragraph 1); Results/Potency Prediction (paragraph 3) Version: version of record | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-23 Audit detailsFollow-up review of Known versions / configuration, Checkpoint identity. Source locations and before/after decisions are recorded in the 23 September profile-evidence audit. Other explanatory content retains its earlier source scope. No human scientific review or independent reproduction is implied. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Model type Biomolecular structure predictor; this record is the paper-specific evaluated configuration. Individual claims | jwohlwend/boltz README.md README.md model description Version: b1ebfc46ecf57f5414e0d1a6f9027bbb122c53bc | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-23 Audit detailsFollow-up review of Known versions / configuration, Checkpoint identity. Source locations and before/after decisions are recorded in the 23 September profile-evidence audit. Other explanatory content retains its earlier source scope. No human scientific review or independent reproduction is implied. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Architecture / procedure Boltz-2 is the co-folding pose-generation comparator; downstream LRIP-SF affinity fitting is separate from this row. Individual claims | A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases Methodologies/Potency Prediction/LRIP-SF/Pose Generation (paragraph 1); Results/Potency Prediction (paragraph 3) Version: version of record | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-23 Audit detailsFollow-up review of Known versions / configuration, Checkpoint identity. Source locations and before/after decisions are recorded in the 23 September profile-evidence audit. Other explanatory content retains its earlier source scope. No human scientific review or independent reproduction is implied. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Weights licence MIT for all code and model weights, explicitly stated in the official Boltz README. Historical evaluated weight identity remains separately recorded. Individual claims | jwohlwend/boltz README.md README.md; license and model release introduction Version: b1ebfc46ecf57f5414e0d1a6f9027bbb122c53bc | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-23 Audit detailsFollow-up review of Known versions / configuration, Checkpoint identity. Source locations and before/after decisions are recorded in the 23 September profile-evidence audit. Other explanatory content retains its earlier source scope. No human scientific review or independent reproduction is implied. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Checkpoint identity The inspected Methods section identifies Boltz-2 and its sampling/ranking procedure but supplies no checkpoint checksum or immutable software revision. Current family documentation cannot fill this historical evaluation gap. Individual claims | A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases Methods section2.1.7, XML sec2.1.7. Version: version of record | unreported automated source review · 2026-09-23 Audit detailsFollow-up review of Known versions / configuration, Checkpoint identity. Source locations and before/after decisions are recorded in the 23 September profile-evidence audit. Other explanatory content retains its earlier source scope. No human scientific review or independent reproduction is implied. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Biological inputs Main-protease protein information and ligand structures/SMILES Individual claims | A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with DiffDock (paragraph 1); Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with Boltz-2 (paragraph 1) Version: version of record | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-23 Audit detailsFollow-up review of Known versions / configuration, Checkpoint identity. Source locations and before/after decisions are recorded in the 23 September profile-evidence audit. Other explanatory content retains its earlier source scope. No human scientific review or independent reproduction is implied. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Outputs Predicted ligand binding poses Individual claims | A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with Gnina (paragraph 2); Methodologies/Potency Prediction/LRIP-SF/Pose Generation (paragraph 2) Version: version of record | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-23 Audit detailsFollow-up review of Known versions / configuration, Checkpoint identity. Source locations and before/after decisions are recorded in the 23 September profile-evidence audit. Other explanatory content retains its earlier source scope. No human scientific review or independent reproduction is implied. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Parameters An aggregate parameter total for this exact evaluated configuration is not established by the inspected sources. Individual claims | jwohlwend/boltz README.md Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Data Preparation; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Molecular Docking with Glide; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Molecular Docking with AutoDock Vina; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Flexible Ligand Superposition with FlexS; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with AlphaFold3; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with DiffDock; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with Boltz-2; Methodologies/Pose Prediction/Deep Learning-Based Modeling with Gnina; inspected for aggregate parameter count (component sizes are not added without an exact configuration); README.md at pinned repository revision Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: b1ebfc46ecf57f5414e0d1a6f9027bbb122c53bc | unreported automated source review · 2026-09-23 Audit detailsFollow-up review of Known versions / configuration, Checkpoint identity. Source locations and before/after decisions are recorded in the 23 September profile-evidence audit. Other explanatory content retains its earlier source scope. No human scientific review or independent reproduction is implied. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: needs review
Stable ID: reported-model-cdc9aabf4efc04