rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Configuration

FFN

Evaluated retrieval configuration from MSAlign Table 3; model-specific inputs and training are retained in the protocol.

4 evaluations · 12 results

Overview

An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

4 evaluations · 12 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Sorted by Top-1 accuracy (retrieval) (higher is better). The best value in each column is highlighted. Decimals are rounded for display; each value links to the printed value and its source.

Tested configurationProtocol and datasetTop-1 accuracy (retrieval)Top-20 accuracy (retrieval)Top-5 accuracy (retrieval)
FFNEvaluationMSAlign molecular retrieval MassSpecGym formula split: no formula, R@1: MassSpecGym formula split retrieval with no formula, MassSpecGym formula split, no formula candidate pool (MSAlign molecular retrieval split)16.9% (best in column)Not reportedNot reported
FFNEvaluationMSAlign molecular retrieval Spectraverse: no formula, R@1: Spectraverse retrieval with no formula, Spectraverse, no formula candidate pool (MSAlign molecular retrieval split)9.5%Not reportedNot reported
FFNEvaluationMSAlign molecular retrieval NPLIB1: no formula, R@1: NPLIB1 retrieval with no formula, NPLIB1, no formula candidate pool (MSAlign molecular retrieval split)8.9%Not reportedNot reported
FFNEvaluationMSAlign molecular retrieval MassSpecGym MCES split: no formula, R@1: MassSpecGym MCES split retrieval with no formula, MassSpecGym MCES split, no formula candidate pool (MSAlign molecular retrieval split)2.54%Not reportedNot reported
FFNEvaluationMSAlign molecular retrieval MassSpecGym formula split: no formula, R@20: MassSpecGym formula split retrieval with no formula, MassSpecGym formula split, no formula candidate pool (MSAlign molecular retrieval split)Not reported40.4%Not reported
FFNEvaluationMSAlign molecular retrieval MassSpecGym formula split: no formula, R@5: MassSpecGym formula split retrieval with no formula, MassSpecGym formula split, no formula candidate pool (MSAlign molecular retrieval split)Not reportedNot reported27.8% (best in column)
FFNEvaluationMSAlign molecular retrieval MassSpecGym MCES split: no formula, R@20: MassSpecGym MCES split retrieval with no formula, MassSpecGym MCES split, no formula candidate pool (MSAlign molecular retrieval split)Not reported20%Not reported
FFNEvaluationMSAlign molecular retrieval MassSpecGym MCES split: no formula, R@5: MassSpecGym MCES split retrieval with no formula, MassSpecGym MCES split, no formula candidate pool (MSAlign molecular retrieval split)Not reportedNot reported7.59%
FFNEvaluationMSAlign molecular retrieval NPLIB1: no formula, R@20: NPLIB1 retrieval with no formula, NPLIB1, no formula candidate pool (MSAlign molecular retrieval split)Not reported44.4% (best in column)Not reported
FFNEvaluationMSAlign molecular retrieval NPLIB1: no formula, R@5: NPLIB1 retrieval with no formula, NPLIB1, no formula candidate pool (MSAlign molecular retrieval split)Not reportedNot reported22%
FFNEvaluationMSAlign molecular retrieval Spectraverse: no formula, R@20: Spectraverse retrieval with no formula, Spectraverse, no formula candidate pool (MSAlign molecular retrieval split)Not reported34.7%Not reported
FFNEvaluationMSAlign molecular retrieval Spectraverse: no formula, R@5: Spectraverse retrieval with no formula, Spectraverse, no formula candidate pool (MSAlign molecular retrieval split)Not reportedNot reported18.9%
All 12 result rows with coverage, uncertainty and sources
Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: FFNProtocol: MSAlign molecular retrieval MassSpecGym formula split: no formula, R@1: MassSpecGym formula split retrieval with no formula
Dataset subset: MassSpecGym formula split, no formula candidate pool (MSAlign molecular retrieval split)
16.9% Top-1 accuracy (retrieval)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FFN on MSAlign molecular retrieval MassSpecGym formula split: no formula, R@1: MassSpecGym formula split retrieval with no formula

Section 5.1 candidate retrieval: 256 mass-matched PubChem candidates per spectrum without formula; formula-conditioned methods can exploit true formula and MSAlign+Filter reduces the pool to about 100. Preserve the named source split; exact original split hashes remain unextracted.

Aggregation: Not reported

msalign: Primary paper PDF · Table 3, MassSpecGym formula split, row R@1, column 3 (FFN)
Configuration: FFNProtocol: MSAlign molecular retrieval MassSpecGym formula split: no formula, R@20: MassSpecGym formula split retrieval with no formula
Dataset subset: MassSpecGym formula split, no formula candidate pool (MSAlign molecular retrieval split)
40.4% Top-20 accuracy (retrieval)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FFN on MSAlign molecular retrieval MassSpecGym formula split: no formula, R@20: MassSpecGym formula split retrieval with no formula

Section 5.1 candidate retrieval: 256 mass-matched PubChem candidates per spectrum without formula; formula-conditioned methods can exploit true formula and MSAlign+Filter reduces the pool to about 100. Preserve the named source split; exact original split hashes remain unextracted.

Aggregation: Not reported

msalign: Primary paper PDF · Table 3, MassSpecGym formula split, row R@20, column 3 (FFN)
Configuration: FFNProtocol: MSAlign molecular retrieval MassSpecGym formula split: no formula, R@5: MassSpecGym formula split retrieval with no formula
Dataset subset: MassSpecGym formula split, no formula candidate pool (MSAlign molecular retrieval split)
27.8% Top-5 accuracy (retrieval)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FFN on MSAlign molecular retrieval MassSpecGym formula split: no formula, R@5: MassSpecGym formula split retrieval with no formula

Section 5.1 candidate retrieval: 256 mass-matched PubChem candidates per spectrum without formula; formula-conditioned methods can exploit true formula and MSAlign+Filter reduces the pool to about 100. Preserve the named source split; exact original split hashes remain unextracted.

Aggregation: Not reported

msalign: Primary paper PDF · Table 3, MassSpecGym formula split, row R@5, column 3 (FFN)
Configuration: FFNProtocol: MSAlign molecular retrieval MassSpecGym MCES split: no formula, R@1: MassSpecGym MCES split retrieval with no formula
Dataset subset: MassSpecGym MCES split, no formula candidate pool (MSAlign molecular retrieval split)
2.54% Top-1 accuracy (retrieval)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FFN on MSAlign molecular retrieval MassSpecGym MCES split: no formula, R@1: MassSpecGym MCES split retrieval with no formula

Section 5.1 candidate retrieval: 256 mass-matched PubChem candidates per spectrum without formula; formula-conditioned methods can exploit true formula and MSAlign+Filter reduces the pool to about 100. Preserve the named source split; exact original split hashes remain unextracted.

Aggregation: Not reported

msalign: Primary paper PDF · Table 3, MassSpecGym MCES split, row R@1, column 3 (FFN)
Configuration: FFNProtocol: MSAlign molecular retrieval MassSpecGym MCES split: no formula, R@20: MassSpecGym MCES split retrieval with no formula
Dataset subset: MassSpecGym MCES split, no formula candidate pool (MSAlign molecular retrieval split)
20% Top-20 accuracy (retrieval)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FFN on MSAlign molecular retrieval MassSpecGym MCES split: no formula, R@20: MassSpecGym MCES split retrieval with no formula

Section 5.1 candidate retrieval: 256 mass-matched PubChem candidates per spectrum without formula; formula-conditioned methods can exploit true formula and MSAlign+Filter reduces the pool to about 100. Preserve the named source split; exact original split hashes remain unextracted.

Aggregation: Not reported

msalign: Primary paper PDF · Table 3, MassSpecGym MCES split, row R@20, column 3 (FFN)
Configuration: FFNProtocol: MSAlign molecular retrieval MassSpecGym MCES split: no formula, R@5: MassSpecGym MCES split retrieval with no formula
Dataset subset: MassSpecGym MCES split, no formula candidate pool (MSAlign molecular retrieval split)
7.59% Top-5 accuracy (retrieval)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FFN on MSAlign molecular retrieval MassSpecGym MCES split: no formula, R@5: MassSpecGym MCES split retrieval with no formula

Section 5.1 candidate retrieval: 256 mass-matched PubChem candidates per spectrum without formula; formula-conditioned methods can exploit true formula and MSAlign+Filter reduces the pool to about 100. Preserve the named source split; exact original split hashes remain unextracted.

Aggregation: Not reported

msalign: Primary paper PDF · Table 3, MassSpecGym MCES split, row R@5, column 3 (FFN)
Configuration: FFNProtocol: MSAlign molecular retrieval NPLIB1: no formula, R@1: NPLIB1 retrieval with no formula
Dataset subset: NPLIB1, no formula candidate pool (MSAlign molecular retrieval split)
8.9% Top-1 accuracy (retrieval)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FFN on MSAlign molecular retrieval NPLIB1: no formula, R@1: NPLIB1 retrieval with no formula

Section 5.1 candidate retrieval: 256 mass-matched PubChem candidates per spectrum without formula; formula-conditioned methods can exploit true formula and MSAlign+Filter reduces the pool to about 100. Preserve the named source split; exact original split hashes remain unextracted.

Aggregation: Not reported

msalign: Primary paper PDF · Table 3, NPLIB1, row R@1, column 3 (FFN)
Configuration: FFNProtocol: MSAlign molecular retrieval NPLIB1: no formula, R@20: NPLIB1 retrieval with no formula
Dataset subset: NPLIB1, no formula candidate pool (MSAlign molecular retrieval split)
44.4% Top-20 accuracy (retrieval)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FFN on MSAlign molecular retrieval NPLIB1: no formula, R@20: NPLIB1 retrieval with no formula

Section 5.1 candidate retrieval: 256 mass-matched PubChem candidates per spectrum without formula; formula-conditioned methods can exploit true formula and MSAlign+Filter reduces the pool to about 100. Preserve the named source split; exact original split hashes remain unextracted.

Aggregation: Not reported

msalign: Primary paper PDF · Table 3, NPLIB1, row R@20, column 3 (FFN)
Configuration: FFNProtocol: MSAlign molecular retrieval NPLIB1: no formula, R@5: NPLIB1 retrieval with no formula
Dataset subset: NPLIB1, no formula candidate pool (MSAlign molecular retrieval split)
22% Top-5 accuracy (retrieval)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FFN on MSAlign molecular retrieval NPLIB1: no formula, R@5: NPLIB1 retrieval with no formula

Section 5.1 candidate retrieval: 256 mass-matched PubChem candidates per spectrum without formula; formula-conditioned methods can exploit true formula and MSAlign+Filter reduces the pool to about 100. Preserve the named source split; exact original split hashes remain unextracted.

Aggregation: Not reported

msalign: Primary paper PDF · Table 3, NPLIB1, row R@5, column 3 (FFN)
Configuration: FFNProtocol: MSAlign molecular retrieval Spectraverse: no formula, R@1: Spectraverse retrieval with no formula
Dataset subset: Spectraverse, no formula candidate pool (MSAlign molecular retrieval split)
9.5% Top-1 accuracy (retrieval)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FFN on MSAlign molecular retrieval Spectraverse: no formula, R@1: Spectraverse retrieval with no formula

Section 5.1 candidate retrieval: 256 mass-matched PubChem candidates per spectrum without formula; formula-conditioned methods can exploit true formula and MSAlign+Filter reduces the pool to about 100. Preserve the named source split; exact original split hashes remain unextracted.

Aggregation: Not reported

msalign: Primary paper PDF · Table 3, Spectraverse, row R@1, column 3 (FFN)
Configuration: FFNProtocol: MSAlign molecular retrieval Spectraverse: no formula, R@20: Spectraverse retrieval with no formula
Dataset subset: Spectraverse, no formula candidate pool (MSAlign molecular retrieval split)
34.7% Top-20 accuracy (retrieval)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FFN on MSAlign molecular retrieval Spectraverse: no formula, R@20: Spectraverse retrieval with no formula

Section 5.1 candidate retrieval: 256 mass-matched PubChem candidates per spectrum without formula; formula-conditioned methods can exploit true formula and MSAlign+Filter reduces the pool to about 100. Preserve the named source split; exact original split hashes remain unextracted.

Aggregation: Not reported

msalign: Primary paper PDF · Table 3, Spectraverse, row R@20, column 3 (FFN)
Configuration: FFNProtocol: MSAlign molecular retrieval Spectraverse: no formula, R@5: Spectraverse retrieval with no formula
Dataset subset: Spectraverse, no formula candidate pool (MSAlign molecular retrieval split)
18.9% Top-5 accuracy (retrieval)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FFN on MSAlign molecular retrieval Spectraverse: no formula, R@5: Spectraverse retrieval with no formula

Section 5.1 candidate retrieval: 256 mass-matched PubChem candidates per spectrum without formula; formula-conditioned methods can exploit true formula and MSAlign+Filter reduces the pool to about 100. Preserve the named source split; exact original split hashes remain unextracted.

Aggregation: Not reported

msalign: Primary paper PDF · Table 3, Spectraverse, row R@5, column 3 (FFN)

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5.

Use this configuration

How it works, versions and access

Additional methodological details, versions and access terms have not yet been extracted into a structured profile for this configuration. Consult the linked sources and evaluation records below.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

3 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Facets: method types
1 values
  • supervised_machine_learning
Individual claims
msalign: Primary paper PDF

Original source ↗

MassSpecGym Section 4.1: Fingerprint FFN "employs a feedforward neural network to predict the Morgan fingerprint", and DeepSets; MSAlign arXiv 2605.19752 Table 1 and "Baselines" (v1 and v2): JESTR "pretrains with batch InfoNCE", Emb-Cos "uses candidates InfoNCE to learn a shared space", SAIL is trained with the batch loss

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: 2605.19752v1
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T20:04:04.777728+00:00

conflicting claim

["source-hash-verification","automated-source-review"] · 2026-10-12

Audit details

Correct the method type from none to supervised_machine_learning (use-case baseline review 2026-10-12, table 1). Evidence from docs/reviews/use-cases/baselines-2026-10-12.md. Independent review 2026-10-12: approved. MSAlign v1 Section 5.1 "Baselines" and Table 1: FFN and DeepSets are fingerprint predictors from MassSpecGym; JESTR, Emb-Cos and SAIL are trained with InfoNCE losses; MSAlign aligns two frozen foundation models. See docs/reviews/2026-10-12-method-type-corrections.md.

Conflicting source claim: "[\"supervised_machine_learning\"]". Claim record status: source_checked.

Field: facets.method_types

Claim: metadata-correction-tags-20261012-575618aa73d2eeccadde

Source artifact SHA-256: 7395a55141ee7916741b7d9e6d4f42a1d3a03217a36ce6824ac3ff48afd4f26f

Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: original_artifact

Inspected artifact

Extraction artifact SHA-256: 7395a55141ee7916741b7d9e6d4f42a1d3a03217a36ce6824ac3ff48afd4f26f

Extraction artifact

Facets: method types
1 values
  • supervised_machine_learning
Individual claims
MassSpecGym: A benchmark for the discovery and identification of molecules

Original source ↗

MassSpecGym Section 4.1: Fingerprint FFN "employs a feedforward neural network to predict the Morgan fingerprint", and DeepSets; MSAlign arXiv 2605.19752 Table 1 and "Baselines" (v1 and v2): JESTR "pretrains with batch InfoNCE", Emb-Cos "uses candidates InfoNCE to learn a shared space", SAIL is trained with the batch loss

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: 2410.23326v1
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:11.146650+00:00

conflicting claim

["source-hash-verification","automated-source-review"] · 2026-10-12

Audit details

Correct the method type from none to supervised_machine_learning (use-case baseline review 2026-10-12, table 1). Evidence from docs/reviews/use-cases/baselines-2026-10-12.md. Independent review 2026-10-12: approved. MSAlign v1 Section 5.1 "Baselines" and Table 1: FFN and DeepSets are fingerprint predictors from MassSpecGym; JESTR, Emb-Cos and SAIL are trained with InfoNCE losses; MSAlign aligns two frozen foundation models. See docs/reviews/2026-10-12-method-type-corrections.md.

Conflicting source claim: "[\"supervised_machine_learning\"]". Claim record status: source_checked.

Field: facets.method_types

Claim: metadata-correction-tags-20261012-575618aa73d2eeccadde

Source artifact SHA-256: 82176d50e8947c8b9baa2a0d91493f5680c0e4c7e25a2266ff7879f48a58c40c

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Extraction artifact SHA-256: 7395a55141ee7916741b7d9e6d4f42a1d3a03217a36ce6824ac3ff48afd4f26f

Extraction artifact

Facets: method types
1 values
  • supervised_machine_learning
Individual claims
MSAlign arXiv v2 Table 3

Original source ↗

MassSpecGym Section 4.1: Fingerprint FFN "employs a feedforward neural network to predict the Morgan fingerprint", and DeepSets; MSAlign arXiv 2605.19752 Table 1 and "Baselines" (v1 and v2): JESTR "pretrains with batch InfoNCE", Emb-Cos "uses candidates InfoNCE to learn a shared space", SAIL is trained with the batch loss

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: 2605.19752v2, 25 September 2026
Retrieved: 2026-09-30

conflicting claim

["source-hash-verification","automated-source-review"] · 2026-10-12

Audit details

Correct the method type from none to supervised_machine_learning (use-case baseline review 2026-10-12, table 1). Evidence from docs/reviews/use-cases/baselines-2026-10-12.md. Independent review 2026-10-12: approved. MSAlign v1 Section 5.1 "Baselines" and Table 1: FFN and DeepSets are fingerprint predictors from MassSpecGym; JESTR, Emb-Cos and SAIL are trained with InfoNCE losses; MSAlign aligns two frozen foundation models. See docs/reviews/2026-10-12-method-type-corrections.md.

Conflicting source claim: "[\"supervised_machine_learning\"]". Claim record status: source_checked.

Field: facets.method_types

Claim: metadata-correction-tags-20261012-575618aa73d2eeccadde

Source artifact SHA-256: a31d1167b0ded72f64717881dd6cba0946a56b495d76f169d8e44115c3266fda

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Extraction artifact SHA-256: 7395a55141ee7916741b7d9e6d4f42a1d3a03217a36ce6824ac3ff48afd4f26f

Extraction artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: msalign-2026-table3-method-ffn

areas
metabolomics
method types
supervised_machine_learning
source locator
Table 3, column FFN; Section 5.1
missing metadata
checkpoint revision: reason: unreported; parameters: reason: unextracted
Related records

Suggest a correction