rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Configuration

MIST + MolForge, reimplemented by the authors, corrected (MassSpecGym in the Wild)

MIST + MolForge, reimplemented by the authors, corrected; no settings beyond its name are recorded.

6 evaluations · 6 results

Overview

An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

6 evaluations · 6 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Dataset: MassSpecGym test fold, de novo generation with formula (bonus) (MassSpecGym in the Wild)

Sorted by Top-1 accuracy (de novo, exact match) (higher is better). The best value in each column is highlighted. Decimals are rounded for display; each value links to the printed value and its source.

Tested configurationProtocol and datasetTop-1 accuracy (de novo, exact match)Top-1 MCES (de novo)Top-1 tanimoto (de novo)Top-10 accuracy (de novo, exact match)Top-10 MCES (de novo)Top-10 tanimoto (de novo)
MIST + MolForge, reimplemented by the authors, corrected (MassSpecGym in the Wild)EvaluationMassSpecGym de novo generation with formula (bonus), Top-1 Accuracy (MassSpecGym in the Wild Table 9)10.7%Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
MIST + MolForge, reimplemented by the authors, corrected (MassSpecGym in the Wild)EvaluationMassSpecGym de novo generation with formula (bonus), Top-1 MCES (MassSpecGym in the Wild Table 9)Not reported22.1Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
MIST + MolForge, reimplemented by the authors, corrected (MassSpecGym in the Wild)EvaluationMassSpecGym de novo generation with formula (bonus), Top-1 Tanimoto (MassSpecGym in the Wild Table 9)Not reportedNot reported0.37Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
MIST + MolForge, reimplemented by the authors, corrected (MassSpecGym in the Wild)EvaluationMassSpecGym de novo generation with formula (bonus), Top-10 Accuracy (MassSpecGym in the Wild Table 9)Not reportedNot reportedNot reported14.5%Not reportedNot reported
MIST + MolForge, reimplemented by the authors, corrected (MassSpecGym in the Wild)EvaluationMassSpecGym de novo generation with formula (bonus), Top-10 MCES (MassSpecGym in the Wild Table 9)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported17.9Not reported
MIST + MolForge, reimplemented by the authors, corrected (MassSpecGym in the Wild)EvaluationMassSpecGym de novo generation with formula (bonus), Top-10 Tanimoto (MassSpecGym in the Wild Table 9)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.41
All 6 result rows with coverage, uncertainty and sources
Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: MIST + MolForge, reimplemented by the authors, corrected (MassSpecGym in the Wild)Protocol: MassSpecGym de novo generation with formula (bonus), Top-1 Accuracy (MassSpecGym in the Wild Table 9)
Dataset: MassSpecGym test fold, de novo generation with formula (bonus) (MassSpecGym in the Wild)
10.7% Top-1 accuracy (de novo, exact match)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MIST + MolForge, reimplemented by the authors, corrected on MassSpecGym denovo-bonus (Top-1 Accuracy)

lit-otheromics-20261011-msgwild-protocol-denovo-bonus-top-1-accuracy

Aggregation: Not reported

MassSpecGym in the Wild: Uncovering and Correcting Evaluation Pitfalls in AI-Driven Molecule Discovery · Table 9, row 'MIST + MolForge† (corrected)', column 'Top-1 Accuracy'
Configuration: MIST + MolForge, reimplemented by the authors, corrected (MassSpecGym in the Wild)Protocol: MassSpecGym de novo generation with formula (bonus), Top-1 MCES (MassSpecGym in the Wild Table 9)
Dataset: MassSpecGym test fold, de novo generation with formula (bonus) (MassSpecGym in the Wild)
22.1 Top-1 MCES (de novo)
unitless · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MIST + MolForge, reimplemented by the authors, corrected on MassSpecGym denovo-bonus (Top-1 MCES)

lit-otheromics-20261011-msgwild-protocol-denovo-bonus-top-1-mces

Aggregation: Not reported

MassSpecGym in the Wild: Uncovering and Correcting Evaluation Pitfalls in AI-Driven Molecule Discovery · Table 9, row 'MIST + MolForge† (corrected)', column 'Top-1 MCES'
Configuration: MIST + MolForge, reimplemented by the authors, corrected (MassSpecGym in the Wild)Protocol: MassSpecGym de novo generation with formula (bonus), Top-1 Tanimoto (MassSpecGym in the Wild Table 9)
Dataset: MassSpecGym test fold, de novo generation with formula (bonus) (MassSpecGym in the Wild)
0.37 Top-1 tanimoto (de novo)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MIST + MolForge, reimplemented by the authors, corrected on MassSpecGym denovo-bonus (Top-1 Tanimoto)

lit-otheromics-20261011-msgwild-protocol-denovo-bonus-top-1-tanimoto

Aggregation: Not reported

MassSpecGym in the Wild: Uncovering and Correcting Evaluation Pitfalls in AI-Driven Molecule Discovery · Table 9, row 'MIST + MolForge† (corrected)', column 'Top-1 Tanimoto'
Configuration: MIST + MolForge, reimplemented by the authors, corrected (MassSpecGym in the Wild)Protocol: MassSpecGym de novo generation with formula (bonus), Top-10 Accuracy (MassSpecGym in the Wild Table 9)
Dataset: MassSpecGym test fold, de novo generation with formula (bonus) (MassSpecGym in the Wild)
14.5% Top-10 accuracy (de novo, exact match)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MIST + MolForge, reimplemented by the authors, corrected on MassSpecGym denovo-bonus (Top-10 Accuracy)

lit-otheromics-20261011-msgwild-protocol-denovo-bonus-top-10-accuracy

Aggregation: Not reported

MassSpecGym in the Wild: Uncovering and Correcting Evaluation Pitfalls in AI-Driven Molecule Discovery · Table 9, row 'MIST + MolForge† (corrected)', column 'Top-10 Accuracy'
Configuration: MIST + MolForge, reimplemented by the authors, corrected (MassSpecGym in the Wild)Protocol: MassSpecGym de novo generation with formula (bonus), Top-10 MCES (MassSpecGym in the Wild Table 9)
Dataset: MassSpecGym test fold, de novo generation with formula (bonus) (MassSpecGym in the Wild)
17.9 Top-10 MCES (de novo)
unitless · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MIST + MolForge, reimplemented by the authors, corrected on MassSpecGym denovo-bonus (Top-10 MCES)

lit-otheromics-20261011-msgwild-protocol-denovo-bonus-top-10-mces

Aggregation: Not reported

MassSpecGym in the Wild: Uncovering and Correcting Evaluation Pitfalls in AI-Driven Molecule Discovery · Table 9, row 'MIST + MolForge† (corrected)', column 'Top-10 MCES'
Configuration: MIST + MolForge, reimplemented by the authors, corrected (MassSpecGym in the Wild)Protocol: MassSpecGym de novo generation with formula (bonus), Top-10 Tanimoto (MassSpecGym in the Wild Table 9)
Dataset: MassSpecGym test fold, de novo generation with formula (bonus) (MassSpecGym in the Wild)
0.41 Top-10 tanimoto (de novo)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MIST + MolForge, reimplemented by the authors, corrected on MassSpecGym denovo-bonus (Top-10 Tanimoto)

lit-otheromics-20261011-msgwild-protocol-denovo-bonus-top-10-tanimoto

Aggregation: Not reported

MassSpecGym in the Wild: Uncovering and Correcting Evaluation Pitfalls in AI-Driven Molecule Discovery · Table 9, row 'MIST + MolForge† (corrected)', column 'Top-10 Tanimoto'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-23-5347695500ed.

Use this configuration

How it works, versions and access

Additional methodological details, versions and access terms have not yet been extracted into a structured profile for this configuration. Consult the linked sources and evaluation records below.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-23-5347695500ed
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-23-5347695500ed · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: lit-otheromics-20261011-msgwild-config-mist-plus-molforge-reimplemented-by-the-authors-corrected

areas
metabolomics
contexts
research
method types
supervised_machine_learning
reported name
MIST + MolForge† (corrected)
foundation model eligible
false
parameters
MIST + MolForge, reimplemented by the authors, corrected
access reuse
Not stated in the source; see the cited work or https://github.com/pluskal-lab/MassSpecGym
source locator
Table 9 row 'MIST + MolForge† (corrected)'
missing metadata
version: reason: unreported; note: Only the printed row label identifies the setup
provenance note
MIST + MolForge, reimplemented by the authors, corrected, as listed in MassSpecGym in the Wild Table 9.
Related records

Suggest a correction