rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Configuration

VARITY_R (Brandes et al. 2023 head-to-head comparison)

VARITY_R, the VARITY model for rare variants: precomputed scores, not from dbNSFP.

2 evaluations · 4 results

Overview

An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

2 evaluations · 4 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Sorted by AUPRC (balanced PRC-AUC over the variants both methods score: mean over 100 random downsamples to equal pathogenic and benign counts (80% of the minority class); zero-shot) (higher is better). The best value in each column is highlighted. Decimals are rounded for display; each value links to the printed value and its source.

All 4 result rows with coverage, uncertainty and sources
Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: VARITY_R (Brandes et al. 2023 head-to-head comparison)Protocol: ClinVar missense pathogenicity, ESM1b head to head with one other method on the variants both score (Brandes et al. 2023 Fig. 2g,h, Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset subset: ClinVar missense variants scored by both ESM1b and VARITY_R (Brandes et al. 2023)
0.949 AUPRC (balanced PRC-AUC over the variants both methods score: mean over 100 random downsamples to equal pathogenic and benign counts (80% of the minority class); zero-shot)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VARITY_R on ClinVar missense, head to head against ESM1b (Brandes et al. 2023)

gfm-guides-20261014-esm1b-protocol-clinvar-head-to-head

Aggregation: Not reported

Brandes et al. 2023 Supplementary Table 2: full benchmark evaluations of ESM1b and all other methods · Supplementary Table 2 sheet 'Table_of_results_ClinVar' cell G46, row 'VARITY_R', column 'head2head_VEP_auc_Balanced_AUPRC'
Configuration: VARITY_R (Brandes et al. 2023 head-to-head comparison)Protocol: ClinVar missense pathogenicity, ESM1b head to head with one other method on the variants both score (Brandes et al. 2023 Fig. 2g,h, Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset subset: ClinVar missense variants scored by both ESM1b and VARITY_R (Brandes et al. 2023)
0.95 AUROC (global ROC-AUC over the variants both methods score; zero-shot)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VARITY_R on ClinVar missense, head to head against ESM1b (Brandes et al. 2023)

gfm-guides-20261014-esm1b-protocol-clinvar-head-to-head

Aggregation: Not reported

Brandes et al. 2023 Supplementary Table 2: full benchmark evaluations of ESM1b and all other methods · Supplementary Table 2 sheet 'Table_of_results_ClinVar' cell E46, row 'VARITY_R', column 'head2head_VEP_auc_AUROC'
Configuration: VARITY_R (Brandes et al. 2023 head-to-head comparison)Protocol: HGMD/gnomAD missense pathogenicity, ESM1b head to head with one other method on the variants both score (Brandes et al. 2023 Fig. 2g,h, Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset subset: HGMD/gnomAD missense variants scored by both ESM1b and VARITY_R (Brandes et al. 2023)
0.939 AUPRC (balanced PRC-AUC over the variants both methods score: mean over 100 random downsamples to equal pathogenic and benign counts (80% of the minority class); zero-shot)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VARITY_R on HGMD/gnomAD missense, head to head against ESM1b (Brandes et al. 2023)

gfm-guides-20261014-esm1b-protocol-hgmd-head-to-head

Aggregation: Not reported

Brandes et al. 2023 Supplementary Table 2: full benchmark evaluations of ESM1b and all other methods · Supplementary Table 2 sheet 'Table_of_results_HGMD' cell G46, row 'VARITY_R', column 'head2head_VEP_auc_Balanced_AUPRC'
Configuration: VARITY_R (Brandes et al. 2023 head-to-head comparison)Protocol: HGMD/gnomAD missense pathogenicity, ESM1b head to head with one other method on the variants both score (Brandes et al. 2023 Fig. 2g,h, Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset subset: HGMD/gnomAD missense variants scored by both ESM1b and VARITY_R (Brandes et al. 2023)
0.935 AUROC (global ROC-AUC over the variants both methods score; zero-shot)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VARITY_R on HGMD/gnomAD missense, head to head against ESM1b (Brandes et al. 2023)

gfm-guides-20261014-esm1b-protocol-hgmd-head-to-head

Aggregation: Not reported

Brandes et al. 2023 Supplementary Table 2: full benchmark evaluations of ESM1b and all other methods · Supplementary Table 2 sheet 'Table_of_results_HGMD' cell E46, row 'VARITY_R', column 'head2head_VEP_auc_AUROC'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.

Use this configuration

How it works, versions and access
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

2 source records and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: gfm-guides-20261014-esm1b-config-varity-r

areas
dna-genomes
contexts
clinical_research
method types
supervised_machine_learning
reported name
VARITY_R
missing metadata
version: reason: unreported; note: VARITY is not in dbNSFP; the score file is not stated
parameters
VARITY scores (not from dbNSFP); source file not stated
foundation model eligible
false
training overlap
Excluded from the paper's main clinical comparison; Supplementary Table 2 note: 'Trained on ClinVar,HumsaVar, HGMD, DMS and gnomAD'
source locator
Supplementary Table 2 column vep_name 'VARITY_R' and column 'note'; Methods 'Other VEP methods'
provenance note
Scored head to head against ESM1b in Brandes et al. 2023 Supplementary Table 2 only; not part of the 19-method comparison in Fig. 2e,f.
Related records

Suggest a correction