rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Configuration

NT 500M human reference, fine-tuned 5 epochs, unpruned (Hegde et al. 2025)

InstaDeepAI/nucleotide-transformer-500m-human-ref fine-tuned for binary eQTL variant classification for 5 epochs with all 24 layers.

1 evaluation · 6 results

Overview

An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

1 evaluation · 6 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: NT 500M human reference, fine-tuned 5 epochs, unpruned (Hegde et al. 2025)Protocol: Fine-tuning and evaluation wall time, 5 epochs on the Enformer eQTL dataset (Hegde et al. 2025 Table A1)
Dataset: Enformer eQTL causal-variant dataset, Genomics Long-Range Benchmark version (Hegde et al. 2025)
8.49 Runtime (Evaluation on the eQTL test split after 5-epoch fine-tuning)
minute · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

NT 500M human reference, 5-epoch fine-tuning time (Hegde et al. 2025 Table A1)

gfm-guide-20261014-protocol-hegde-eqtl-finetune-5-epochs-time

Aggregation: Not reported

Reaping the Fruits of LLM Pruning: Towards Small Language Models for Efficient Non-Coding Variant Effect Prediction · Table A1, row seed 41, column 'Evaluation Time (Minutes)'
Configuration: NT 500M human reference, fine-tuned 5 epochs, unpruned (Hegde et al. 2025)Protocol: Fine-tuning and evaluation wall time, 5 epochs on the Enformer eQTL dataset (Hegde et al. 2025 Table A1)
Dataset: Enformer eQTL causal-variant dataset, Genomics Long-Range Benchmark version (Hegde et al. 2025)
8.51 Runtime (Evaluation on the eQTL test split after 5-epoch fine-tuning)
minute · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

NT 500M human reference, 5-epoch fine-tuning time (Hegde et al. 2025 Table A1)

gfm-guide-20261014-protocol-hegde-eqtl-finetune-5-epochs-time

Aggregation: Not reported

Reaping the Fruits of LLM Pruning: Towards Small Language Models for Efficient Non-Coding Variant Effect Prediction · Table A1, row seed 42, column 'Evaluation Time (Minutes)'
Configuration: NT 500M human reference, fine-tuned 5 epochs, unpruned (Hegde et al. 2025)Protocol: Fine-tuning and evaluation wall time, 5 epochs on the Enformer eQTL dataset (Hegde et al. 2025 Table A1)
Dataset: Enformer eQTL causal-variant dataset, Genomics Long-Range Benchmark version (Hegde et al. 2025)
8.49 Runtime (Evaluation on the eQTL test split after 5-epoch fine-tuning)
minute · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

NT 500M human reference, 5-epoch fine-tuning time (Hegde et al. 2025 Table A1)

gfm-guide-20261014-protocol-hegde-eqtl-finetune-5-epochs-time

Aggregation: Not reported

Reaping the Fruits of LLM Pruning: Towards Small Language Models for Efficient Non-Coding Variant Effect Prediction · Table A1, row seed 43, column 'Evaluation Time (Minutes)'
Configuration: NT 500M human reference, fine-tuned 5 epochs, unpruned (Hegde et al. 2025)Protocol: Fine-tuning and evaluation wall time, 5 epochs on the Enformer eQTL dataset (Hegde et al. 2025 Table A1)
Dataset: Enformer eQTL causal-variant dataset, Genomics Long-Range Benchmark version (Hegde et al. 2025)
7.53 Runtime (Fine-tuning, 5 epochs, unpruned model)
hour · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

NT 500M human reference, 5-epoch fine-tuning time (Hegde et al. 2025 Table A1)

gfm-guide-20261014-protocol-hegde-eqtl-finetune-5-epochs-time

Aggregation: Not reported

Reaping the Fruits of LLM Pruning: Towards Small Language Models for Efficient Non-Coding Variant Effect Prediction · Table A1, row seed 41, column 'Training Time (Hours)'
Configuration: NT 500M human reference, fine-tuned 5 epochs, unpruned (Hegde et al. 2025)Protocol: Fine-tuning and evaluation wall time, 5 epochs on the Enformer eQTL dataset (Hegde et al. 2025 Table A1)
Dataset: Enformer eQTL causal-variant dataset, Genomics Long-Range Benchmark version (Hegde et al. 2025)
7.5 Runtime (Fine-tuning, 5 epochs, unpruned model)
hour · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

NT 500M human reference, 5-epoch fine-tuning time (Hegde et al. 2025 Table A1)

gfm-guide-20261014-protocol-hegde-eqtl-finetune-5-epochs-time

Aggregation: Not reported

Reaping the Fruits of LLM Pruning: Towards Small Language Models for Efficient Non-Coding Variant Effect Prediction · Table A1, row seed 42, column 'Training Time (Hours)'
Configuration: NT 500M human reference, fine-tuned 5 epochs, unpruned (Hegde et al. 2025)Protocol: Fine-tuning and evaluation wall time, 5 epochs on the Enformer eQTL dataset (Hegde et al. 2025 Table A1)
Dataset: Enformer eQTL causal-variant dataset, Genomics Long-Range Benchmark version (Hegde et al. 2025)
7.48 Runtime (Fine-tuning, 5 epochs, unpruned model)
hour · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

NT 500M human reference, 5-epoch fine-tuning time (Hegde et al. 2025 Table A1)

gfm-guide-20261014-protocol-hegde-eqtl-finetune-5-epochs-time

Aggregation: Not reported

Reaping the Fruits of LLM Pruning: Towards Small Language Models for Efficient Non-Coding Variant Effect Prediction · Table A1, row seed 43, column 'Training Time (Hours)'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.

Use this configuration

How it works, versions and access
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: gfm-guide-20261014-config-hegde-nt-500m-human-ref-5-epochs

areas
dna-genomes
contexts
research
method types
foundation_model
reported name
Nucleotide Transformer (original, non-pruned)
checkpoint
InstaDeepAI/nucleotide-transformer-500m-human-ref
hardware
description: 2 × NVIDIA TITAN Xp GPUs (Methods, for the Nucleotide Transformer); Table A1 itself names no hardware
fine tuning
description: LoRA parameter-efficient fine-tuning with the peft package (r=1, lora_alpha=32, lora_dropout=0.1) through the Hugging Face Trainer, 5 epochs (Appendix A.3)
source locator
Appendix A.1; Appendix A.3; Methods paragraph 3
missing metadata
version: reason: unreported; note: Hugging Face repository named without a revision
Related records

Suggest a correction