rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Configuration

MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)

MetaMaps as run in Portik et al. 2022.

4 evaluations · 32 results

Overview

MetaMaps as run in Portik et al. 2022.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

4 evaluations · 32 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: HiFi ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (PacBio Sequel II HiFi): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: HiFi ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)
0.7 f-beta-score
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on HiFi ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-hifi-atcc-msa1003-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'HiFi ATCC MSA1003', row 'MetaMaps' (table row 10), column 'F0.5'
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: HiFi ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (PacBio Sequel II HiFi): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: HiFi ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)
0.78 f1-score
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on HiFi ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-hifi-atcc-msa1003-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'HiFi ATCC MSA1003', row 'MetaMaps' (table row 10), column 'F1'
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: HiFi ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (PacBio Sequel II HiFi): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: HiFi ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)
1 false-negative-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on HiFi ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-hifi-atcc-msa1003-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'HiFi ATCC MSA1003', row 'MetaMaps' (table row 10), column 'False negatives'
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: HiFi ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (PacBio Sequel II HiFi): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: HiFi ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)
10 false-positive-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on HiFi ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-hifi-atcc-msa1003-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'HiFi ATCC MSA1003', row 'MetaMaps' (table row 10), column 'False positives'
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: HiFi ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (PacBio Sequel II HiFi): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: HiFi ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)
53.1% composition-l1-distance
percent · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on HiFi ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-hifi-atcc-msa1003-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'HiFi ATCC MSA1003', row 'MetaMaps' (table row 10), column 'L1'
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: HiFi ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (PacBio Sequel II HiFi): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: HiFi ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)
0.66 precision
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on HiFi ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-hifi-atcc-msa1003-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'HiFi ATCC MSA1003', row 'MetaMaps' (table row 10), column 'Precision'
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: HiFi ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (PacBio Sequel II HiFi): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: HiFi ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)
0.95 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on HiFi ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-hifi-atcc-msa1003-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'HiFi ATCC MSA1003', row 'MetaMaps' (table row 10), column 'Recall'
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: HiFi ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (PacBio Sequel II HiFi): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: HiFi ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)
19 true-positive-count
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on HiFi ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-hifi-atcc-msa1003-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'HiFi ATCC MSA1003', row 'MetaMaps' (table row 10), column 'True positives'
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: HiFi ZymoBIOMICS D6331 gut microbiome standard (PacBio Sequel II HiFi): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: HiFi ZymoBIOMICS D6331 gut microbiome standard (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)
0.21 f-beta-score
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on HiFi ZymoBIOMICS D6331 gut microbiome standard (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-hifi-zymo-d6331-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'HiFi Zymo D6331 (17 species, staggered)', row 'MetaMaps*' (table row 31), column 'F0.5'
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: HiFi ZymoBIOMICS D6331 gut microbiome standard (PacBio Sequel II HiFi): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: HiFi ZymoBIOMICS D6331 gut microbiome standard (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)
0.29 f1-score
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on HiFi ZymoBIOMICS D6331 gut microbiome standard (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-hifi-zymo-d6331-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'HiFi Zymo D6331 (17 species, staggered)', row 'MetaMaps*' (table row 31), column 'F1'
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: HiFi ZymoBIOMICS D6331 gut microbiome standard (PacBio Sequel II HiFi): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: HiFi ZymoBIOMICS D6331 gut microbiome standard (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)
4 false-negative-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on HiFi ZymoBIOMICS D6331 gut microbiome standard (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-hifi-zymo-d6331-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'HiFi Zymo D6331 (17 species, staggered)', row 'MetaMaps*' (table row 31), column 'False negatives'
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: HiFi ZymoBIOMICS D6331 gut microbiome standard (PacBio Sequel II HiFi): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: HiFi ZymoBIOMICS D6331 gut microbiome standard (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)
50 false-positive-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on HiFi ZymoBIOMICS D6331 gut microbiome standard (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-hifi-zymo-d6331-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'HiFi Zymo D6331 (17 species, staggered)', row 'MetaMaps*' (table row 31), column 'False positives'
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: HiFi ZymoBIOMICS D6331 gut microbiome standard (PacBio Sequel II HiFi): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: HiFi ZymoBIOMICS D6331 gut microbiome standard (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)
74.9% composition-l1-distance
percent · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on HiFi ZymoBIOMICS D6331 gut microbiome standard (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-hifi-zymo-d6331-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'HiFi Zymo D6331 (17 species, staggered)', row 'MetaMaps*' (table row 31), column 'L1'
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: HiFi ZymoBIOMICS D6331 gut microbiome standard (PacBio Sequel II HiFi): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: HiFi ZymoBIOMICS D6331 gut microbiome standard (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)
0.18 precision
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on HiFi ZymoBIOMICS D6331 gut microbiome standard (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-hifi-zymo-d6331-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'HiFi Zymo D6331 (17 species, staggered)', row 'MetaMaps*' (table row 31), column 'Precision'
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: HiFi ZymoBIOMICS D6331 gut microbiome standard (PacBio Sequel II HiFi): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: HiFi ZymoBIOMICS D6331 gut microbiome standard (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)
0.73 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on HiFi ZymoBIOMICS D6331 gut microbiome standard (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-hifi-zymo-d6331-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'HiFi Zymo D6331 (17 species, staggered)', row 'MetaMaps*' (table row 31), column 'Recall'
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: HiFi ZymoBIOMICS D6331 gut microbiome standard (PacBio Sequel II HiFi): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: HiFi ZymoBIOMICS D6331 gut microbiome standard (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)
11 true-positive-count
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on HiFi ZymoBIOMICS D6331 gut microbiome standard (PacBio Sequel II HiFi)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-hifi-zymo-d6331-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'HiFi Zymo D6331 (17 species, staggered)', row 'MetaMaps*' (table row 31), column 'True positives'
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: ONT Q20 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (PromethION): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: ONT Q20 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (PromethION)
0.2 f-beta-score
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on ONT Q20 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (PromethION)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-ont-q20-zymo-d6300-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'ONT Q20 Zymo D6300 (10 species, even)', row 'MetaMaps' (table row 59), column 'F0.5'
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: ONT Q20 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (PromethION): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: ONT Q20 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (PromethION)
0.28 f1-score
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on ONT Q20 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (PromethION)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-ont-q20-zymo-d6300-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'ONT Q20 Zymo D6300 (10 species, even)', row 'MetaMaps' (table row 59), column 'F1'
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: ONT Q20 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (PromethION): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: ONT Q20 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (PromethION)
1 false-negative-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on ONT Q20 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (PromethION)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-ont-q20-zymo-d6300-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'ONT Q20 Zymo D6300 (10 species, even)', row 'MetaMaps' (table row 59), column 'False negatives'
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: ONT Q20 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (PromethION): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: ONT Q20 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (PromethION)
45 false-positive-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on ONT Q20 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (PromethION)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-ont-q20-zymo-d6300-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'ONT Q20 Zymo D6300 (10 species, even)', row 'MetaMaps' (table row 59), column 'False positives'
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: ONT Q20 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (PromethION): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: ONT Q20 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (PromethION)
14.2% composition-l1-distance
percent · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on ONT Q20 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (PromethION)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-ont-q20-zymo-d6300-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'ONT Q20 Zymo D6300 (10 species, even)', row 'MetaMaps' (table row 59), column 'L1'
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: ONT Q20 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (PromethION): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: ONT Q20 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (PromethION)
0.17 precision
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on ONT Q20 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (PromethION)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-ont-q20-zymo-d6300-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'ONT Q20 Zymo D6300 (10 species, even)', row 'MetaMaps' (table row 59), column 'Precision'
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: ONT Q20 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (PromethION): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: ONT Q20 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (PromethION)
0.9 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on ONT Q20 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (PromethION)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-ont-q20-zymo-d6300-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'ONT Q20 Zymo D6300 (10 species, even)', row 'MetaMaps' (table row 59), column 'Recall'
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: ONT Q20 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (PromethION): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: ONT Q20 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (PromethION)
9 true-positive-count
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on ONT Q20 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (PromethION)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-ont-q20-zymo-d6300-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'ONT Q20 Zymo D6300 (10 species, even)', row 'MetaMaps' (table row 59), column 'True positives'
Configuration: MetaMaps (Portik et al. 2022)Protocol: ONT R10.3 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (GridION): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)
Dataset: ONT R10.3 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (GridION)
0.21 f-beta-score
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetaMaps on ONT R10.3 ZymoBIOMICS D6300 standard, length-filtered (GridION)

dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-ont-r10-zymo-d6300-species

Aggregation: Not reported

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'ONT R10 Zymo D6300 (10 species, even)', row 'MetaMaps' (table row 45), column 'F0.5'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-09-8cc1db47c7f9.

Use this model

How it works, versions and access
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-09-8cc1db47c7f9
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-09-8cc1db47c7f9 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: dna-pathogen-20261009-config-portik2022-metamaps-0-1-miniseq-h

areas
microbes-communities
contexts
clinical_research
method types
conventional_pipeline
reported name
MetaMaps
source locator
Table 2 row MetaMaps; Methods 'MetaMaps' and 'Reference databases' paragraph 4
foundation model eligible
false
version
0.1
parameters
Pre-built MiniSeq + H database (12,058 complete RefSeq genomes); metamaps mapDirectly then classify
Related records

Suggest a correction