rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Configuration

Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)

Configuration as run in the cited comparison.

6 evaluations · 33 results

Overview

Configuration as run in the cited comparison.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

6 evaluations · 33 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.985 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9805 to 0.9898

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C22; group 'BRCA'; row 'EDM'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.932 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9073 to 0.9574

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E22; group 'BRCA'; row 'EDM'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.838 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.7936 to 0.8824

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D22; group 'BRCA'; row 'EDM'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.99 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9850 to 0.9951

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C32; group 'CHOL'; row 'EDM'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.955 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9289 to 0.9811

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E32; group 'CHOL'; row 'EDM'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.917 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8838 to 0.9495

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D32; group 'CHOL'; row 'EDM'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
1 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9991 to 1.0000

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C42; group 'CRC'; row 'EDM'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
1 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 1.0000 to 1.0000

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E42; group 'CRC'; row 'EDM'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.993 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9803 to 1.0000

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D42; group 'CRC'; row 'EDM'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Jiang cohort cross-validation, liver cancer (Table S2)
Dataset: Jiang et al. 2018 plasma WGS, 90 liver cancer and 135 non-cancer (as used by Hou et al. 2024)
0.994 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9925 to 0.9963

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), Jiang cohort liver cancer cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-jiang-lihc-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C92; group 'LIHC'; row 'EDM'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.998 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9957 to 0.9997

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C62; group 'NSCLC'; row 'EDM'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
1 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 1.0000 to 1.0000

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E62; group 'NSCLC'; row 'EDM'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.95 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9073 to 0.9927

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D62; group 'NSCLC'; row 'EDM'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.989 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9849 to 0.9930

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C72; group 'OV'; row 'EDM'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.958 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9293 to 0.9873

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E72; group 'OV'; row 'EDM'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.82 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.7618 to 0.8782

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D72; group 'OV'; row 'EDM'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.954 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9421 to 0.9667

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C82; group 'PAAD'; row 'EDM'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.873 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8396 to 0.9054

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E82; group 'PAAD'; row 'EDM'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.817 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.7751 to 0.8582

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D82; group 'PAAD'; row 'EDM'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.974 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9696 to 0.9776

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C12; group 'PANCAN'; row 'EDM'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.963 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9435 to 0.9819

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C52; group 'STAD'; row 'EDM'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.92 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8875 to 0.9525

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E52; group 'STAD'; row 'EDM'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.897 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8586 to 0.9347

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D52; group 'STAD'; row 'EDM'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 independent validation, Mathios et al. LUCAS cohort (Table S3)
Dataset: Mathios et al. 2021 LUCAS cohort, 129 lung cancer and 158 non-cancer (as used by Hou et al. 2024)
0.551 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), independent validation on Mathios et al. LUCAS dataset (LUNG)

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-mathios-lucas-independent

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S3, C22; data set 'Mathios et al. LUCAS dataset (LUNG)'; row 'EDM'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Fragment 5' end motif (4-mer), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 independent validation, Mathios et al. LUCAS cohort (Table S3)
Dataset: Mathios et al. 2021 LUCAS cohort, 129 lung cancer and 158 non-cancer (as used by Hou et al. 2024)
0.256 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EDM (open chromatin), independent validation on Mathios et al. LUCAS dataset (LUNG)

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-mathios-lucas-independent

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S3, E22; data set 'Mathios et al. LUCAS dataset (LUNG)'; row 'EDM'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-10-7b8f80935f90.

Use this model

How it works, versions and access
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-10-7b8f80935f90
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-10-7b8f80935f90 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: ctdnafrag-20261009-config-hou2024-end-motif-open-chromatin

areas
dna-genomes
contexts
clinical_research
method types
supervised_machine_learning
reported name
EDM
foundation model eligible
false
source locator
Article Table 1 row 'EDM', column 'open chromatin region'; Experimental Section P29-P41
missing metadata
version: reason: unreported; note: Hou et al. re-implementation; no software version or code commit is printed
parameters
Feature setting: open chromatin regions. Classifier: scikit-learn support vector machine with default parameters.
Related records

Suggest a correction