rewire.itbenchmarks
Task

unseen-species genus classification

Genus classification tests whether frozen DNA-barcode embeddings transfer to species absent from the reference partition.

SourcesBarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses · Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60

1 evaluation · 1 result

Overview

Datasets

DNA barcodes organized into Seen and Unseen species partitions, with genus labels.

Metrics

Genus-level classification accuracy with cosine-similarity nearest-neighbour retrieval.

Allowed inputs

DNA barcodes represented as frozen model embeddings.

SourcesBarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses · Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60
Evaluation procedure diagram
How it worksComputational evaluation flow
Computational evaluation flow1. Input: DNA barcodes represented as frozen model embeddings.. Then: 2. Evaluation: One-nearest-neighbour retrieval from Seen training examples; no task-head training for this genus task.. Then: 3. Readout: Genus-level classification accuracy with cosine-similarity nearest-neighbour retrieval.Computational evaluation flow1. Input: DNA barcodes represented as frozen model embeddings.. Then: 2. Evaluation: One-nearest-neighbour retrieval from Seen training examples; no task-head training for this genus task.. Then: 3. Readout: Genus-level classification accuracy with cosine-similarity nearest-neighbour retrieval.Computational evaluation flow1. Input: DNA barcodes represented as frozen model embeddings.. Then: 2. Evaluation: One-nearest-neighbour retrieval from Seen training examples; no task-head training for this genus task.. Then: 3. Readout: Genus-level classification accuracy with cosine-similarity nearest-neighbour retrieval.

Conceptual summary of the cited evaluation; exact task configuration and source version remain part of the protocol.

SourcesBarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses · Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60

limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. All specifications and missing details

Results

Results are available, but no reviewed comparison panel is linked in this release.

All evaluations

1 evaluation · 1 result. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: BarcodeBERT (4–4-4)Task: unseen-species genus classification
Dataset: DNA barcodes of unseen species
78.5% accuracy
percent · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BarcodeBERT (4–4-4): unseen-species genus classification

genus-level nearest-neighbor probe on species unseen in training

Aggregation: Not reported

BarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses · Table 1, BarcodeBERT (4–4-4) row, unseen-species genus-level 1-NN Acc (%) column

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

How it works

Evaluation methodology

DNA barcodes organized into Seen and Unseen species partitions, with genus labels. One-nearest-neighbour genus prediction uses the Seen training subset as reference and the Unseen species partition as queries. Genus-level classification accuracy with cosine-similarity nearest-neighbour retrieval. BLAST and several DNA language-model embeddings are compared in the paper. Unseen species are excluded from the reference partition; this task is distinct from fine-tuned closed-world species classification. The cited text-accessible evaluation sections give no confidence-interval, resampling or repeat-run error-bar specification. Image-only tables and uninspected supplements are outside this absence claim.

SourcesBarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses · Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this task. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

A task describes a biological question. Choose a linked protocol to obtain concrete split and scoring instructions.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Strengths and limitations

Limitations and conditions

Profile review details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Stable record: reported-task-4a54ce01b5a855

Specifications

Inputs, training, access and other details

Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.

Data, procedure and scoring
PropertyDescription and evidence
DatasetsDNA barcodes organized into Seen and Unseen species partitions, with genus labels.
SourcesBarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses · Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60
SplitsOne-nearest-neighbour genus prediction uses the Seen training subset as reference and the Unseen species partition as queries.
SourcesBarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses · Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60
MetricsGenus-level classification accuracy with cosine-similarity nearest-neighbour retrieval.
SourcesBarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses · Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60
BaselinesBLAST and several DNA language-model embeddings are compared in the paper.
SourcesBarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses · Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60
Leakage controlsUnseen species are excluded from the reference partition; this task is distinct from fine-tuned closed-world species classification.
SourcesBarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses · Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60
UncertaintyThe cited text-accessible evaluation sections give no confidence-interval, resampling or repeat-run error-bar specification. Image-only tables and uninspected supplements are outside this absence claim. · Not reported in inspected sources
SourcesBarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses · Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60
Entity typePaper-specific computational evaluation protocol.
SourcesBarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses · Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60
OrganismsSeen and Unseen species partitions with genus-level labels.
SourcesBarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses · Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60
AssaysDNA barcode sequence/taxonomic annotations.
SourcesBarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses · Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60
Allowed inputsDNA barcodes represented as frozen model embeddings.
SourcesBarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses · Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60
AdaptationOne-nearest-neighbour retrieval from Seen training examples; no task-head training for this genus task.
SourcesBarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses · Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Papers and result coverage

Last literature check: 2026-09-17. Primary-paper discovery and source inspection. Source-checked results are not independently reproduced experiments.

Paper or primary resourceVersionReference
BarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analysesjournal full text in PMCRead source
DOI: 10.1093/bioadv/vbag054
Historical gaps recorded on 2026-09-17

The catalogue now holds 1 result rows for this benchmark. A note below about pending extraction describes the state on 2026-09-17 and may since have been answered by a later batch. The result rows and their sources are the current record.

  • Table does not give uncertainty for each genus accuracy; BLAST is an alignment reference, not a pretrained encoder.
Search and extraction details

primary comparison table screened

Searches

  • "BarcodeBERT" unseen species

Evidence locations

  • Table 1 and footnotes
  • Section 3.1.2 Data partitioning

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

18 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Diagram caption
Conceptual summary of the cited evaluation; exact task configuration and source version remain part of the protocol.
Individual claims
BarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses

Original source ↗

Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558051+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.caption

Source artifact SHA-256: 493f9fe70b483780ba76d51ccf217d3ca83539c82b89917fd3ccebe2b6eb831d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Diagram steps
  • Input: DNA barcodes represented as frozen model embeddings.
  • Evaluation: One-nearest-neighbour retrieval from Seen training examples; no task-head training for this genus task.
  • Readout: Genus-level classification accuracy with cosine-similarity nearest-neighbour retrieval.
Individual claims
BarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses

Original source ↗

Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558051+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.steps

Source artifact SHA-256: 493f9fe70b483780ba76d51ccf217d3ca83539c82b89917fd3ccebe2b6eb831d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Diagram title
Computational evaluation flow
Individual claims
BarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses

Original source ↗

Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558051+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.title

Source artifact SHA-256: 493f9fe70b483780ba76d51ccf217d3ca83539c82b89917fd3ccebe2b6eb831d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Datasets
DNA barcodes organized into Seen and Unseen species partitions, with genus labels.
Individual claims
BarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses

Original source ↗

Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558051+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.0.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 493f9fe70b483780ba76d51ccf217d3ca83539c82b89917fd3ccebe2b6eb831d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Splits
One-nearest-neighbour genus prediction uses the Seen training subset as reference and the Unseen species partition as queries.
Individual claims
BarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses

Original source ↗

Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558051+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.1.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 493f9fe70b483780ba76d51ccf217d3ca83539c82b89917fd3ccebe2b6eb831d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Adaptation
One-nearest-neighbour retrieval from Seen training examples; no task-head training for this genus task.
Individual claims
BarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses

Original source ↗

Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558051+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.10.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 493f9fe70b483780ba76d51ccf217d3ca83539c82b89917fd3ccebe2b6eb831d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Metrics
Genus-level classification accuracy with cosine-similarity nearest-neighbour retrieval.
Individual claims
BarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses

Original source ↗

Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558051+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.2.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 493f9fe70b483780ba76d51ccf217d3ca83539c82b89917fd3ccebe2b6eb831d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Baselines
BLAST and several DNA language-model embeddings are compared in the paper.
Individual claims
BarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses

Original source ↗

Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558051+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.3.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 493f9fe70b483780ba76d51ccf217d3ca83539c82b89917fd3ccebe2b6eb831d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Leakage controls
Unseen species are excluded from the reference partition; this task is distinct from fine-tuned closed-world species classification.
Individual claims
BarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses

Original source ↗

Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558051+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.4.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 493f9fe70b483780ba76d51ccf217d3ca83539c82b89917fd3ccebe2b6eb831d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Uncertainty
The cited text-accessible evaluation sections give no confidence-interval, resampling or repeat-run error-bar specification. Image-only tables and uninspected supplements are outside this absence claim.
Individual claims
BarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses

Original source ↗

Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558051+00:00

unreported

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.5.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 493f9fe70b483780ba76d51ccf217d3ca83539c82b89917fd3ccebe2b6eb831d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: needs review

2 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: reported-task-4a54ce01b5a855

areas
dna-genomes
tasks
unseen-species genus classification
entity level
task
version
Not reported
task
unseen-species genus classification
scope note
Paper-specific evaluation task; protocol completeness requires further extraction.
benchmark research
review date: 2026-09-17; status: primary_comparison_table_screened; primary sources: expansion-p3-barcodebert-2026; inspected locators: Table 1 and footnotes; Section 3.1.2 Data partitioning; searched queries: "BarcodeBERT" unseen species; gaps: Table does not give uncertainty for each genus accuracy; BLAST is an alignment reference, not a pretrained encoder.; claim scope: Primary-paper discovery and source inspection. Source-checked results are not independently reproduced experiments.
historical missing metadata
protocol version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract
metadata review scope
historical_missing_metadata preserves the original discovery state. Current descriptive evidence and missingness are recorded in profile.facts; numerical-result review is separate.
legacy kinds
benchmark
entity classification
review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: This source-scoped record identifies the biological prediction task and holds its paper context. Preserve the existing task identity; exact split, model adaptation and scoring remain in linked evaluations or separate protocol records.; source ids: barcodebert-2026; source locator: Experimental setup §§4.1.1–4.1.4; Table 1; cached text lines 35–50, 60; ambiguities: A paper- or suite-specific task may constrain some inputs or metrics; that alone does not make it interchangeable with a complete versioned protocol. No protocol equivalence is inferred.; Some legacy profile Entity type facts use the generic phrase computational evaluation protocol. That boilerplate is not sufficient to establish a single fixed protocol identity or to merge this task with another protocol record.
Related records

Suggest a correction