rewire.itbenchmarks
Task

ATOM3D RES: Residue identity

Residue identity. Scored with Accuracy on ATOM3D RES. Trained and scored under the ATOM3D split for this task. Asterisks in the paper mark a run whose training data differed.

4 evaluations · 4 results

Overview

Residue identity. Scored with Accuracy on ATOM3D RES. Trained and scored under the ATOM3D split for this task. Asterisks in the paper mark a run whose training data differed.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Results

Each comparison retains its reviewed evaluation scope, dataset and metric. Results are shown without a pooled ranking.

ATOM3D RES: Residue identity

accuracy (fraction) · Higher values are better.

ATOM3D RES: Residue identity · ATOM3D RES (ATOM3D split)

Evidence origin: Author-reported evaluation.

ATOM3D: Tasks On Molecules in Three Dimensions · Table 4, row(RES accuracy)
  • The paper marks some runs with an asterisk to say their training data differed, though the splitting criteria were the same.
Comparison details and limitations

Every method ATOM3D reports on Residue identity, scored with Accuracy on ATOM3D RES.

  • Author-reported numbers, source checked but not independently reproduced.
  • MAE and RMSE are errors, better when lower. The other metrics are better when higher.
  • Comparison methods are named by the citation the table prints; the paper's text says which method each is.

Automated source review: 2026-09-18. Numerical source review does not establish independent reproduction.

Dots show point estimates. Whiskers show only explicitly defined uncertainty (standard deviation, standard error or a labelled interval); their definitions remain in Table. Unresolved uncertainty is not plotted. Differences do not establish statistical significance.

Showing 4 of 4 matching rows.

Tested configuration
00.250.50.751
Reported score
  1. 3DCNN0.451
  2. TAPE Transformer (ATOM3D baseline) (cited as [Rao et al., 2019])0.3
  3. GNN0.082
  4. ENN0.072

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Evaluation design

Benchmarks bring together tasks and protocols. A task describes the biological question; a protocol defines a particular test.

Benchmarks

These source-backed links do not make different protocols or scores interchangeable.

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this task. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

A task describes a biological question. Choose a linked protocol to obtain concrete split and scoring instructions.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Relationship: part of
discovery-benchmark-atom3d
Individual claims
ATOM3D: Tasks On Molecules in Three Dimensions

Original source ↗

Table 4, row(RES accuracy)

Version: Primary full-text snapshot retrieved 2026-09-17; exact bytes pinned by SHA-256
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T08:06:28.182997+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-18

Audit details

Primary-source transcription with no human sign-off and no independent reproduction.

Field: links:part_of:discovery-benchmark-atom3d

Claim: atom3d-association-res

Source artifact SHA-256: 92656c20a15311c32bed9edc7f465bb26eb30338f40324fe43bec4b1fc6a7890

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: atom3d-task-res

areas
molecular-interactions
tasks
Residue identity
metric
Accuracy
metric direction
higher
dataset
ATOM3D RES
protocol
Trained and scored under the ATOM3D split for this task. Asterisks in the paper mark a run whose training data differed.
source locator
Table 4, row(RES accuracy)
comparison panels
id: atom3d-panel-res; title: ATOM3D RES: Residue identity; protocol id: atom3d-task-res; dataset id: atom3d-dataset-atom3d-res; metric: accuracy; unit: fraction; direction: higher; result ids: atom3d-result-3dcnn-res-accuracy; atom3d-result-gnn-res-accuracy; atom3d-result-enn-res-accuracy; atom3d-result-rao-et-al-2019-res-accuracy; source ids: evidence-expansion-atom3d-92656c20; source locator: Table 4, row(RES accuracy); context: Every method ATOM3D reports on Residue identity, scored with Accuracy on ATOM3D RES.; caveats: Author-reported numbers, source checked but not independently reproduced.; MAE and RMSE are errors, better when lower. The other metrics are better when higher.; Comparison methods are named by the citation the table prints; the paper's text says which method each is.; The paper marks some runs with an asterisk to say their training data differed, though the splitting criteria were the same.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-18
Related records

Suggest a correction