rewire.itbenchmarks
Result

81% case_recovery_top5

Exomiser v14 ACG trio rank-budget evaluation: case_recovery_top5

Tested configuration
Exomiser v14 default, Talos 2026 comparison
Protocol
Exomiser rank-budget recovery in ACG trios
Dataset
ACG trios: Exomiser SNV/indel comparison as reported in Results
Related family profiles
Exomiser
Procedure
Not reported
Evaluation
Exomiser v14 ACG trio rank-budget evaluation
Coverage
scored: unreported; eligible: unreported
Uncertainty
Not reported
Evidence
Author-reported evaluation · source checkedAutomated reanalysis of genomic data for rare disease diagnostics at scale · Results, Comparison with other tools, rank top5

A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: source checked. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.

Reproduction

Split
Not reported
Adaptation
Not reported
Scoring implementation
Source-defined endpoint; see result source_locator

No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.

Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Reported result
81%
Individual claims
Automated reanalysis of genomic data for rare disease diagnostics at scale

Original source ↗

Results, Comparison with other tools, rank top5

Version: Nature Medicine 2026 final publication, 24 June 2026
Retrieved: 2026-09-30T21:24:16Z

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-30

author reported

Audit details

Transcription from inspected primary source. No execution, independent replication or human scientific review.

Field: attributes.printed_value

Source artifact SHA-256: 629b9578ac42717245256feca69dc9c9d5442deb7d282dd1bdc5a6c1a1efd2ec

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: uc-clinical-20260930-exomiser-top5-percent

areas
dna-genomes
contexts
clinical_research
metric
case_recovery_top5
unit
percent
printed value
81%
numeric value
81
metric direction
higher
uncertainty
Not reported
source locator
Results, Comparison with other tools, rank top5
review
method: automated_source_review; reviewer: Codex clinical coverage worker; date: 2026-09-30; note: Transcription from inspected primary source. No execution, independent replication or human scientific review.; source id: uc-clinical-20260930-source-talos
denominator
194
missing metadata
uncertainty: not reported for this endpoint
Related records

Suggest a correction