rewire.itbenchmarks
Result

0.786 F1

geNomad: F1 on Genome-wide prophage detection

Tested configuration
geNomad
Protocol
Genome-wide prophage detection (Genome-wide prophage detection)
Dataset
LAMBDA genome-wide prophage test
Procedure
Scan complete genomes with overlapping windows and postprocess predictions into prophage regions. Genome-wide metrics are computed at region level and macro-averaged across genomes. Filtered gLM pipelines include normalization, smoothing, clustering and size filtering; these are not standalone encoder scores. 80 bacterial genomes,47 species,four phyla;386 annotated prophage locations.
Evaluation
geNomad: Genome-wide prophage detection
Coverage
scored: unreported; eligible: unreported
Uncertainty
Not reported
Evidence
Independent external evaluation · source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row geNomad, column F1; XML row3 column6

A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: needs review. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.

Reproduction

Split
80 bacterial genomes,47 species,four phyla;386 annotated prophage locations.
Adaptation
Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label
Scoring implementation
Not reported

No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.

Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Reported result
0.786
Individual claims
LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models

Original source ↗

Table 5., row geNomad, column F1; XML row3 column6

Version: PMC13041943.1
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:21.006973+00:00

source checked

Primary-table transcription and separate automated source review · 2026-09-17

independent paper

Audit details

Source checked does not mean experimentally reproduced.

Field: attributes.printed_value

Source artifact SHA-256: 22c2e218e87dce757907f6086a0e2ad37c13f785b34fff5bea7cfa1a6c276b16

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: source checked

2 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: paper-result-2c8d80c884705f8507

areas
microbes-communities
tasks
Genome-wide prophage detection
printed value
0.786
numeric value
0.786
metric
F1
metric direction
higher
unit
fraction
uncertainty
Not reported
eligible count
Not reported
scored count
Not reported
reported population
Not reported
source locator
Table 5., row geNomad, column F1; XML row3 column6
source occurrences
source id: part2-lambda-prophage-2026; locator: Table 5., row geNomad, column F1; XML row3 column6
review
method: Primary-table transcription and separate automated source review; date: 2026-09-17; note: Source checked does not mean experimentally reproduced.
missing metadata
scored count: unreported; eligible count: unextracted; checkpoint revision: unextracted; uncertainty: unreported
Related records

Suggest a correction