rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Result

0.478 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity

hou2024-s3-fragment-length-mathios-ind sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity (lung cancer vs healthy; independent validation)

Tested configuration
Fragment length distribution, open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)
Protocol
Hou et al. 2024 independent validation, Mathios et al. independent lung cohort (Table S3)
Dataset
Mathios et al. 2021 independent lung cohort, 46 lung cancer and 385 healthy (as used by Hou et al. 2024)
Procedure
ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-mathios-independent
Evaluation
length (open chromatin), independent validation on Mathios et al. independent dataset (LUNG)
Coverage
Not reported scored / Not reported eligible
Uncertainty
Not reported by the source
Evidence
Independent external evaluation · source checkedSystematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S3, D23; data set 'Mathios et al. independent dataset (LUNG)'; row 'length'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'

A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: source checked. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.

Reproduction

Split
Independent validation (trained on another cohort)
Adaptation
SVM trained on the training cohort, applied unchanged
Scoring implementation
Not reported

No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.

Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

2 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-09-ba02f2f4a36e
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Reported result
0.4783
Individual claims
Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns

Original source ↗

Supporting Information sheet S3, D23; data set 'Mathios et al. independent dataset (LUNG)'; row 'length'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Advanced Science 11(30):e2308243, published 2024-06-17; PMC11321639 full-text XML
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T20:27:02Z

source checked

["source-hash-verification","deterministic-table-parse","independent-cell-check"] · 2026-10-09

independent paper

Audit details

Extracted by deterministic parse of the pinned XLSX cell XML (extract/rawxlsx.py) with sheet title, header and row labels asserted. Numeric General-format cells; printed_value is the shortest round-trip decimal of the stored value and raw_xml_value the stored text. Independent review 2026-10-09: value and identity match the source. No second table reports these per-pattern independent-validation values.

Field: attributes.printed_value

Source artifact SHA-256: d029fc9d593a70fc350fa86cf1c6393ab5121479396b448ea2c0cdd87b6ace70

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Extraction artifact SHA-256: 41b24f7e6bcb9bea6127a249127a4c4d53e8ea42b50e95242054791511695fb0

Extraction artifact

Reported result
0.4783
Individual claims
Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15)

Original source ↗

Supporting Information sheet S3, D23; data set 'Mathios et al. independent dataset (LUNG)'; row 'length'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: ADVS-11-2308243-s001.xlsx, PMC open-access copy PMC11321639.1
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T20:20:39Z

source checked

["source-hash-verification","deterministic-table-parse","independent-cell-check"] · 2026-10-09

independent paper

Audit details

Extracted by deterministic parse of the pinned XLSX cell XML (extract/rawxlsx.py) with sheet title, header and row labels asserted. Numeric General-format cells; printed_value is the shortest round-trip decimal of the stored value and raw_xml_value the stored text. Independent review 2026-10-09: value and identity match the source. No second table reports these per-pattern independent-validation values.

Field: attributes.printed_value

Source artifact SHA-256: 41b24f7e6bcb9bea6127a249127a4c4d53e8ea42b50e95242054791511695fb0

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Extraction artifact SHA-256: 41b24f7e6bcb9bea6127a249127a4c4d53e8ea42b50e95242054791511695fb0

Extraction artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-09-ba02f2f4a36e · Record review: source checked

2 source records and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: ctdnafrag-20261009-result-hou2024-s3-fragment-length-mathios-ind-sens95

metric
sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
metric qualifier
lung cancer vs healthy; independent validation
metric direction
higher
unit
fraction
printed value
0.4783
numeric value
0.4783
source locator
Supporting Information sheet S3, D23; data set 'Mathios et al. independent dataset (LUNG)'; row 'length'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
review
method: source-hash-verification; deterministic-table-parse; independent-cell-check; method note: Re-downloaded the workbook and matched its SHA-256. Read the cell with a separate stdlib OOXML reader written for this review (shared strings, raw cell text, and the number format from styles.xml, General for every extracted cell); the extractor's scripts were not imported or run. Built each cell's identity from the sheet title, header row and row labels, then checked raw text, printed value (shortest round-trip decimal, or the leading number of a text cell), numeric value, interval, metric, qualifier, unit, direction, denominator, and the linked evaluation's configuration, protocol and dataset.; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Separate Claude review agent, independent of the extractor; no human review claimed; date: 2026-10-09; artifact sha256: 41b24f7e6bcb9bea6127a249127a4c4d53e8ea42b50e95242054791511695fb0; retrieval url: https://pmc-oa-opendata.s3.amazonaws.com/PMC11321639.1/ADVS-11-2308243-s001.xlsx; note: Extracted by deterministic parse of the pinned XLSX cell XML (extract/rawxlsx.py) with sheet title, header and row labels asserted. Numeric General-format cells; printed_value is the shortest round-trip decimal of the stored value and raw_xml_value the stored text. Independent review 2026-10-09: value and identity match the source. No second table reports these per-pattern independent-validation values.
missing metadata
uncertainty: reason: unreported
raw xml value
0.4783
Related records

Suggest a correction