rewire.itbenchmarks
Protocol

RhoMax WT-background holdout split 4

Original RhoMax publication evaluation; not the FLIP2 by_wild_type split.

3 evaluations · 12 results

Overview

Original RhoMax publication evaluation; not the FLIP2 by_wild_type split.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

3 recorded evaluations, 12 metric rows. A comparison chart has not yet been validated for these results. The table retains the individual findings and their sources.

View coverage and remaining gaps across all benchmarks

Results

Results are available, but no reviewed comparison panel is linked in this release.

All evaluations

3 evaluations · 12 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: BLASSO (RhoMax paper eV-trained comparator)Protocol: RhoMax WT-background holdout split 4
Dataset subset: RhoMax split 4 test population
0.095 ± 0.05 mean_absolute_error
eV · lower

Uncertainty: type: standard_deviation; reported spread: 0.05; scope: Printed error dispersion within test split

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BLASSO (RhoMax paper eV-trained comparator) / split 4

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

RhoMax 2024 primary article · Table 1, eV block, row split 4, column mean and standard deviation blasso
Configuration: BLASSO (RhoMax paper eV-trained comparator)Protocol: RhoMax WT-background holdout split 4
Dataset subset: RhoMax split 4 test population
25.02 ± 15.1 mean_absolute_error
nm · lower

Uncertainty: type: standard_deviation; reported spread: 15.1; scope: Printed error dispersion within test split

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BLASSO (RhoMax paper eV-trained comparator) / split 4

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

RhoMax 2024 primary article · Table 1, nm block, row split 4, column mean and standard deviation blasso
Configuration: BLASSO (RhoMax paper eV-trained comparator)Protocol: RhoMax WT-background holdout split 4
Dataset subset: RhoMax split 4 test population
0.1 median_absolute_error
eV · lower

Uncertainty: type: unreported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BLASSO (RhoMax paper eV-trained comparator) / split 4

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

RhoMax 2024 primary article · Table 1, eV block, row split 4, column median blasso
Configuration: BLASSO (RhoMax paper eV-trained comparator)Protocol: RhoMax WT-background holdout split 4
Dataset subset: RhoMax split 4 test population
25.7 median_absolute_error
nm · lower

Uncertainty: type: unreported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BLASSO (RhoMax paper eV-trained comparator) / split 4

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

RhoMax 2024 primary article · Table 1, nm block, row split 4, column median blasso
Configuration: RhoMaxProtocol: RhoMax WT-background holdout split 4
Dataset subset: RhoMax split 4 test population
0.074 ± 0.07 mean_absolute_error
eV · lower

Uncertainty: type: standard_deviation; reported spread: 0.07; scope: Printed error dispersion within test split

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

RhoMax / split 4

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

RhoMax 2024 primary article · Table 1, eV block, row split 4, column mean and standard deviation rhomax
Configuration: RhoMaxProtocol: RhoMax WT-background holdout split 4
Dataset subset: RhoMax split 4 test population
16.68 ± 14.6 mean_absolute_error
nm · lower

Uncertainty: type: standard_deviation; reported spread: 14.6; scope: Printed error dispersion within test split

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

RhoMax / split 4

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

RhoMax 2024 primary article · Table 1, nm block, row split 4, column mean and standard deviation rhomax
Configuration: RhoMaxProtocol: RhoMax WT-background holdout split 4
Dataset subset: RhoMax split 4 test population
0.054 median_absolute_error
eV · lower

Uncertainty: type: unreported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

RhoMax / split 4

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

RhoMax 2024 primary article · Table 1, eV block, row split 4, column median rhomax
Configuration: RhoMaxProtocol: RhoMax WT-background holdout split 4
Dataset subset: RhoMax split 4 test population
13.4 median_absolute_error
nm · lower

Uncertainty: type: unreported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

RhoMax / split 4

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

RhoMax 2024 primary article · Table 1, nm block, row split 4, column median rhomax
Configuration: RhoMax + retinalProtocol: RhoMax WT-background holdout split 4
Dataset subset: RhoMax split 4 test population
0.090 ± 0.06 mean_absolute_error
eV · lower

Uncertainty: type: standard_deviation; reported spread: 0.06; scope: Printed error dispersion within test split

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

RhoMax + retinal / split 4

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

RhoMax 2024 primary article · Table 1, eV block, row split 4, column mean and standard deviation rhomax-retinal
Configuration: RhoMax + retinalProtocol: RhoMax WT-background holdout split 4
Dataset subset: RhoMax split 4 test population
23.33 ± 13.7 mean_absolute_error
nm · lower

Uncertainty: type: standard_deviation; reported spread: 13.7; scope: Printed error dispersion within test split

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

RhoMax + retinal / split 4

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

RhoMax 2024 primary article · Table 1, nm block, row split 4, column mean and standard deviation rhomax-retinal
Configuration: RhoMax + retinalProtocol: RhoMax WT-background holdout split 4
Dataset subset: RhoMax split 4 test population
0.09 median_absolute_error
eV · lower

Uncertainty: type: unreported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

RhoMax + retinal / split 4

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

RhoMax 2024 primary article · Table 1, eV block, row split 4, column median rhomax-retinal
Configuration: RhoMax + retinalProtocol: RhoMax WT-background holdout split 4
Dataset subset: RhoMax split 4 test population
23.7 median_absolute_error
nm · lower

Uncertainty: type: unreported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

RhoMax + retinal / split 4

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

RhoMax 2024 primary article · Table 1, nm block, row split 4, column median rhomax-retinal

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Evaluation design

Benchmarks bring together tasks and protocols. A task describes the biological question; a protocol defines a particular test.

These source-backed links do not make different protocols or scores interchangeable.

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Baseline coverage

Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.

0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.

No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.

Author-reported evaluations
3

Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.

Null control

Proposed control: requires review

Training-set mean where supervised fitting is permitted

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Conventional reference

Proposed control: requires review

Simple features with train-only ridge regression

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Protocol coverage CSV · Model evaluation matrix · Source table · Release and checksums

Coverage is derived from release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions
Applicable tests and references

Applicability is distinct from a completed evaluation.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Relationship: part of
uc20260930-benchmark-rhomax
Individual claims
RhoMax 2024 primary article

Original source ↗

Table 1; Methods Data Set and Comparison to Previous Methods

Version: 2024 journal article; XML pinned by SHA-256
Retrieved: 2026-09-30

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-30T21:44:09.612264+00:00

Audit details

Field: links:part_of:uc20260930-benchmark-rhomax

Claim: uc20260930-protocol-parent-d2997e9995876322

Source artifact SHA-256: 93814dd95c40cb109d592c2917728dc568c0445571e08180b188e726a4bd8f19

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: uc20260930-rhomax-protocol-split-4

areas
proteins-complexes
source locator
Data Set; Comparison to Previous Methods; Table 1
review
method: automated_source_review; reviewer: Codex experimental-use-case curation; date: 2026-09-30; reviewed at: 2026-09-30T21:40:59.576893+00:00; scope: Primary-source transcription and catalogue applicability audit; not human scientific review or independent experimental reproduction.
aggregation
one WT-group holdout split
Related records

Suggest a correction