rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Protocol

Recovery of known allelic-imbalance genes and outlier calls in true-negative samples, patient muscle RNA-seq (Silverstein et al. Table S9, ANEVA-H and MAE)

Gene-level ANEVA-H and variant-level DROP MAE, scored on known monoallelic loss-of-function events and on true-negative samples, muscle with matched DNA variant calls.

2 evaluations · 18 results

Overview

An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

2 recorded evaluations, 18 metric rows. A comparison chart has not yet been validated for these results. The table retains the individual findings and their sources.

View coverage and remaining gaps across all benchmarks

Results

Results are available, but no reviewed comparison panel is linked in this release.

All evaluations

2 evaluations · 18 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Protocol: Recovery of known allelic-imbalance genes and outlier calls in true-negative samples, patient muscle RNA-seq (Silverstein et al. Table S9, ANEVA-H and MAE) · Dataset: NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (Silverstein et al. 2026)

Sorted by Accuracy (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9)) (higher is better). The best value in each column is highlighted. Decimals are rounded for display; each value links to the printed value and its source.

Tested configurationAccuracy (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))F1 (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))False negatives (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))False positives (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))MCC (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))Precision (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))Recall (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))True negatives (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))True positives (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))
ANEVA-H (Silverstein et al. 2026)Evaluation0.462 (best in column)0.588 (best in column)3 (best in column)4 (best in column)-0.184 (best in column)0.556 (best in column)0.625 (best in column)1 (best in column)5 (best in column)
MAE (Silverstein et al. 2026)Evaluation0.3850.5563 (best in column)5-0.4330.50.625 (best in column)05 (best in column)
All 18 result rows with coverage, uncertainty and sources
Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: ANEVA-H (Silverstein et al. 2026)Protocol: Recovery of known allelic-imbalance genes and outlier calls in true-negative samples, patient muscle RNA-seq (Silverstein et al. Table S9, ANEVA-H and MAE)
Dataset: NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (Silverstein et al. 2026)
0.462 Accuracy (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ANEVA-H on the NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (allelic-imbalance)

rna-splicing-20261011-silverstein2026-protocol-allelic-imbalance

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking RNA-seq Tools for Real-World Diagnostic Applications (Silverstein et al., medRxiv 2026); Silverstein et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S10 (medRxiv media-3.xlsx) · Table S9 (sheet 'Table S9') cell F9, row 'ANEVA-H', column 'Accuracy'
Configuration: ANEVA-H (Silverstein et al. 2026)Protocol: Recovery of known allelic-imbalance genes and outlier calls in true-negative samples, patient muscle RNA-seq (Silverstein et al. Table S9, ANEVA-H and MAE)
Dataset: NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (Silverstein et al. 2026)
0.588 F1 (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ANEVA-H on the NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (allelic-imbalance)

rna-splicing-20261011-silverstein2026-protocol-allelic-imbalance

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking RNA-seq Tools for Real-World Diagnostic Applications (Silverstein et al., medRxiv 2026); Silverstein et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S10 (medRxiv media-3.xlsx) · Table S9 (sheet 'Table S9') cell I9, row 'ANEVA-H', column 'F1'
Configuration: ANEVA-H (Silverstein et al. 2026)Protocol: Recovery of known allelic-imbalance genes and outlier calls in true-negative samples, patient muscle RNA-seq (Silverstein et al. Table S9, ANEVA-H and MAE)
Dataset: NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (Silverstein et al. 2026)
3 False negatives (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ANEVA-H on the NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (allelic-imbalance)

rna-splicing-20261011-silverstein2026-protocol-allelic-imbalance

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking RNA-seq Tools for Real-World Diagnostic Applications (Silverstein et al., medRxiv 2026); Silverstein et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S10 (medRxiv media-3.xlsx) · Table S9 (sheet 'Table S9') cell C9, row 'ANEVA-H', column 'False Negatives'
Configuration: ANEVA-H (Silverstein et al. 2026)Protocol: Recovery of known allelic-imbalance genes and outlier calls in true-negative samples, patient muscle RNA-seq (Silverstein et al. Table S9, ANEVA-H and MAE)
Dataset: NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (Silverstein et al. 2026)
4 False positives (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ANEVA-H on the NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (allelic-imbalance)

rna-splicing-20261011-silverstein2026-protocol-allelic-imbalance

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking RNA-seq Tools for Real-World Diagnostic Applications (Silverstein et al., medRxiv 2026); Silverstein et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S10 (medRxiv media-3.xlsx) · Table S9 (sheet 'Table S9') cell E9, row 'ANEVA-H', column 'False Positives'
Configuration: ANEVA-H (Silverstein et al. 2026)Protocol: Recovery of known allelic-imbalance genes and outlier calls in true-negative samples, patient muscle RNA-seq (Silverstein et al. Table S9, ANEVA-H and MAE)
Dataset: NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (Silverstein et al. 2026)
-0.184 MCC (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ANEVA-H on the NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (allelic-imbalance)

rna-splicing-20261011-silverstein2026-protocol-allelic-imbalance

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking RNA-seq Tools for Real-World Diagnostic Applications (Silverstein et al., medRxiv 2026); Silverstein et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S10 (medRxiv media-3.xlsx) · Table S9 (sheet 'Table S9') cell J9, row 'ANEVA-H', column 'MCC'
Configuration: ANEVA-H (Silverstein et al. 2026)Protocol: Recovery of known allelic-imbalance genes and outlier calls in true-negative samples, patient muscle RNA-seq (Silverstein et al. Table S9, ANEVA-H and MAE)
Dataset: NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (Silverstein et al. 2026)
0.556 Precision (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ANEVA-H on the NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (allelic-imbalance)

rna-splicing-20261011-silverstein2026-protocol-allelic-imbalance

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking RNA-seq Tools for Real-World Diagnostic Applications (Silverstein et al., medRxiv 2026); Silverstein et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S10 (medRxiv media-3.xlsx) · Table S9 (sheet 'Table S9') cell G9, row 'ANEVA-H', column 'Precision'
Configuration: ANEVA-H (Silverstein et al. 2026)Protocol: Recovery of known allelic-imbalance genes and outlier calls in true-negative samples, patient muscle RNA-seq (Silverstein et al. Table S9, ANEVA-H and MAE)
Dataset: NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (Silverstein et al. 2026)
0.625 Recall (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ANEVA-H on the NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (allelic-imbalance)

rna-splicing-20261011-silverstein2026-protocol-allelic-imbalance

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking RNA-seq Tools for Real-World Diagnostic Applications (Silverstein et al., medRxiv 2026); Silverstein et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S10 (medRxiv media-3.xlsx) · Table S9 (sheet 'Table S9') cell H9, row 'ANEVA-H', column 'Recall'
Configuration: ANEVA-H (Silverstein et al. 2026)Protocol: Recovery of known allelic-imbalance genes and outlier calls in true-negative samples, patient muscle RNA-seq (Silverstein et al. Table S9, ANEVA-H and MAE)
Dataset: NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (Silverstein et al. 2026)
1 True negatives (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ANEVA-H on the NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (allelic-imbalance)

rna-splicing-20261011-silverstein2026-protocol-allelic-imbalance

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking RNA-seq Tools for Real-World Diagnostic Applications (Silverstein et al., medRxiv 2026); Silverstein et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S10 (medRxiv media-3.xlsx) · Table S9 (sheet 'Table S9') cell D9, row 'ANEVA-H', column 'True Negatives'
Configuration: ANEVA-H (Silverstein et al. 2026)Protocol: Recovery of known allelic-imbalance genes and outlier calls in true-negative samples, patient muscle RNA-seq (Silverstein et al. Table S9, ANEVA-H and MAE)
Dataset: NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (Silverstein et al. 2026)
5 True positives (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ANEVA-H on the NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (allelic-imbalance)

rna-splicing-20261011-silverstein2026-protocol-allelic-imbalance

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking RNA-seq Tools for Real-World Diagnostic Applications (Silverstein et al., medRxiv 2026); Silverstein et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S10 (medRxiv media-3.xlsx) · Table S9 (sheet 'Table S9') cell B9, row 'ANEVA-H', column 'True Positives'
Configuration: MAE (Silverstein et al. 2026)Protocol: Recovery of known allelic-imbalance genes and outlier calls in true-negative samples, patient muscle RNA-seq (Silverstein et al. Table S9, ANEVA-H and MAE)
Dataset: NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (Silverstein et al. 2026)
0.385 Accuracy (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MAE on the NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (allelic-imbalance)

rna-splicing-20261011-silverstein2026-protocol-allelic-imbalance

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking RNA-seq Tools for Real-World Diagnostic Applications (Silverstein et al., medRxiv 2026); Silverstein et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S10 (medRxiv media-3.xlsx) · Table S9 (sheet 'Table S9') cell F10, row 'MAE', column 'Accuracy'
Configuration: MAE (Silverstein et al. 2026)Protocol: Recovery of known allelic-imbalance genes and outlier calls in true-negative samples, patient muscle RNA-seq (Silverstein et al. Table S9, ANEVA-H and MAE)
Dataset: NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (Silverstein et al. 2026)
0.556 F1 (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MAE on the NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (allelic-imbalance)

rna-splicing-20261011-silverstein2026-protocol-allelic-imbalance

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking RNA-seq Tools for Real-World Diagnostic Applications (Silverstein et al., medRxiv 2026); Silverstein et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S10 (medRxiv media-3.xlsx) · Table S9 (sheet 'Table S9') cell I10, row 'MAE', column 'F1'
Configuration: MAE (Silverstein et al. 2026)Protocol: Recovery of known allelic-imbalance genes and outlier calls in true-negative samples, patient muscle RNA-seq (Silverstein et al. Table S9, ANEVA-H and MAE)
Dataset: NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (Silverstein et al. 2026)
3 False negatives (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MAE on the NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (allelic-imbalance)

rna-splicing-20261011-silverstein2026-protocol-allelic-imbalance

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking RNA-seq Tools for Real-World Diagnostic Applications (Silverstein et al., medRxiv 2026); Silverstein et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S10 (medRxiv media-3.xlsx) · Table S9 (sheet 'Table S9') cell C10, row 'MAE', column 'False Negatives'
Configuration: MAE (Silverstein et al. 2026)Protocol: Recovery of known allelic-imbalance genes and outlier calls in true-negative samples, patient muscle RNA-seq (Silverstein et al. Table S9, ANEVA-H and MAE)
Dataset: NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (Silverstein et al. 2026)
5 False positives (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MAE on the NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (allelic-imbalance)

rna-splicing-20261011-silverstein2026-protocol-allelic-imbalance

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking RNA-seq Tools for Real-World Diagnostic Applications (Silverstein et al., medRxiv 2026); Silverstein et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S10 (medRxiv media-3.xlsx) · Table S9 (sheet 'Table S9') cell E10, row 'MAE', column 'False Positives'
Configuration: MAE (Silverstein et al. 2026)Protocol: Recovery of known allelic-imbalance genes and outlier calls in true-negative samples, patient muscle RNA-seq (Silverstein et al. Table S9, ANEVA-H and MAE)
Dataset: NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (Silverstein et al. 2026)
-0.433 MCC (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MAE on the NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (allelic-imbalance)

rna-splicing-20261011-silverstein2026-protocol-allelic-imbalance

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking RNA-seq Tools for Real-World Diagnostic Applications (Silverstein et al., medRxiv 2026); Silverstein et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S10 (medRxiv media-3.xlsx) · Table S9 (sheet 'Table S9') cell J10, row 'MAE', column 'MCC'
Configuration: MAE (Silverstein et al. 2026)Protocol: Recovery of known allelic-imbalance genes and outlier calls in true-negative samples, patient muscle RNA-seq (Silverstein et al. Table S9, ANEVA-H and MAE)
Dataset: NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (Silverstein et al. 2026)
0.5 Precision (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MAE on the NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (allelic-imbalance)

rna-splicing-20261011-silverstein2026-protocol-allelic-imbalance

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking RNA-seq Tools for Real-World Diagnostic Applications (Silverstein et al., medRxiv 2026); Silverstein et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S10 (medRxiv media-3.xlsx) · Table S9 (sheet 'Table S9') cell G10, row 'MAE', column 'Precision'
Configuration: MAE (Silverstein et al. 2026)Protocol: Recovery of known allelic-imbalance genes and outlier calls in true-negative samples, patient muscle RNA-seq (Silverstein et al. Table S9, ANEVA-H and MAE)
Dataset: NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (Silverstein et al. 2026)
0.625 Recall (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MAE on the NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (allelic-imbalance)

rna-splicing-20261011-silverstein2026-protocol-allelic-imbalance

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking RNA-seq Tools for Real-World Diagnostic Applications (Silverstein et al., medRxiv 2026); Silverstein et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S10 (medRxiv media-3.xlsx) · Table S9 (sheet 'Table S9') cell H10, row 'MAE', column 'Recall'
Configuration: MAE (Silverstein et al. 2026)Protocol: Recovery of known allelic-imbalance genes and outlier calls in true-negative samples, patient muscle RNA-seq (Silverstein et al. Table S9, ANEVA-H and MAE)
Dataset: NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (Silverstein et al. 2026)
0 True negatives (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MAE on the NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (allelic-imbalance)

rna-splicing-20261011-silverstein2026-protocol-allelic-imbalance

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking RNA-seq Tools for Real-World Diagnostic Applications (Silverstein et al., medRxiv 2026); Silverstein et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S10 (medRxiv media-3.xlsx) · Table S9 (sheet 'Table S9') cell D10, row 'MAE', column 'True Negatives'
Configuration: MAE (Silverstein et al. 2026)Protocol: Recovery of known allelic-imbalance genes and outlier calls in true-negative samples, patient muscle RNA-seq (Silverstein et al. Table S9, ANEVA-H and MAE)
Dataset: NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (Silverstein et al. 2026)
5 True positives (positives per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample; aggregated across the tissue sets each tool was run on (Table S9))
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MAE on the NIH neuromuscular diagnosed RNA-seq truth set (allelic-imbalance)

rna-splicing-20261011-silverstein2026-protocol-allelic-imbalance

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking RNA-seq Tools for Real-World Diagnostic Applications (Silverstein et al., medRxiv 2026); Silverstein et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S10 (medRxiv media-3.xlsx) · Table S9 (sheet 'Table S9') cell B10, row 'MAE', column 'True Positives'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Baseline coverage

Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.

0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.

No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.

Author-reported evaluations
1
External evaluations
1

Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.

Null control

Proposed control: requires review

Select a task-valid null control after reviewing inputs and metric

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Conventional reference

Proposed control: requires review

Select an upstream conventional reference after reviewing the full protocol

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Protocol coverage CSV (gzip) · Model evaluation matrix (gzip) · Source table (gzip) · Release and checksums (gzip)

Coverage is derived from release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

2 source records and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: rna-splicing-20261011-silverstein2026-protocol-allelic-imbalance

areas
rna-transcriptomes
contexts
clinical_research
protocol
Restrict to 59 muscle samples with exome or genome VCFs. Run the DROP MAE module (v1.4.0, allelic threshold 70) and ANEVA-h (phASER gene-level ASE, ANEVA-DOT test, GTEx v8 muscle reference, BH FDR < 0.05). A true positive requires the correct rare variant (MAE) or gene (ANEVA-H); a true-negative sample is correct only if no outlier is reported.
version
Table S9 (medRxiv v1 supplement)
source locator
Table S9 rows 9 and 10; Methods 'Allelic Imbalance Tools' and 'True Positive and Negative Detection'; Table S8
limitations
Eight true-positive genes and five or six true-negative samples; MAE reports TN 0 and FP 5, ANEVA-H TN 1 and FP 4.; The authors did not develop rMATS-turbo, MINTIE, FRASER, LeafcutterMD, OUTRIDER or the DROP MAE module. ANEVA-h is the authors' own method: two of its authors (K. R. Ganapathy and S. Silverstein) are the first and third authors of reference 36, the ANEVA-h preprint, so the ANEVA-H row is recorded as author_reported.; Positives are counted per known event or gene, negatives per true-negative sample: a negative sample with any reported outlier counts as one false positive. Accuracy, precision and MCC therefore mix event-level and sample-level units (Methods 'True Positive and Negative Detection').; Variants with clinically interpretable mechanisms were selected; the authors state this favours clearly defined events and likely underestimates tool sensitivity, and that binary outlier scoring of negatives may overestimate false-positive rates and lowers MCC (Discussion, limitations paragraph).; Retrospective study of a single centre's neuromuscular cohort; no confidence intervals are printed.
Related records

Suggest a correction