rewire.itbenchmarks
Protocol

Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set (human RNA 2-prime-O-methylation site prediction)

Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set · ACC. 41-nt centred RNA windows; balanced 8,037 positive and 8,037 negative samples after 80% identity filtering, then 8:2 train/test division. Held-out independent test set.

Sources2OMe-LM: predicting 2′-O-methylation sites in human RNA using a pre-trained RNA language model · Performance comparison of 2OMe-LM with existing predictors on the independent test set. a; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 2 NmRF, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 3 BERT2OME, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 4 H2Opred, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 5 Meta-2OM, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 6 2OMe-LM, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC

5 evaluations · 35 results

Overview

Key specifications have not been extracted for this record. See the linked evaluation and sources for the reported setup.

limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. All specifications and missing details

Results

Each comparison retains its reviewed evaluation scope, dataset and metric. Results are shown without a pooled ranking.

Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set · ACC

ACC (fraction) · Higher values are better.

Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set (human RNA 2-prime-O-methylation site prediction) · Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set

Evidence origin: Independent external evaluation, Author-reported evaluation.

2OMe-LM: predicting 2′-O-methylation sites in human RNA using a pre-trained RNA language model · Performance comparison of 2OMe-LM with existing predictors on the independent test set. a; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 2 NmRF, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 3 BERT2OME, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 4 H2Opred, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 5 Meta-2OM, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 6 2OMe-LM, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC
  • Do not pool cross-validation and independent-test scores. The 8:2 ratio is not converted into an exact test count. Training-data overlap for pre-existing predictors is not established by this table. Origins are labelled per method; appearance in one table does not constitute independent replication of every model.
Comparison details and limitations

41-nt centred RNA windows; balanced 8,037 positive and 8,037 negative samples after 80% identity filtering, then 8:2 train/test division. Held-out independent test set.

Automated source review: 2026-09-17. Numerical source review does not establish independent reproduction.

Dots show point estimates. Whiskers show only explicitly defined uncertainty (standard deviation, standard error or a labelled interval); their definitions remain in Table. Unresolved uncertainty is not plotted. Differences do not establish statistical significance.

Showing 5 of 5 matching rows.

Tested configuration
00.250.50.751
Reported score
  1. 2OMe-LM 0.898
  2. H2Opred0.819
  3. BERT2OME0.795
  4. Meta-2OM0.78
  5. NmRF0.512

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

How it works

Evaluation in this paper

41-nt centred RNA windows; balanced 8,037 positive and 8,037 negative samples after 80% identity filtering, then 8:2 train/test division. Held-out independent test set.

Sources2OMe-LM: predicting 2′-O-methylation sites in human RNA using a pre-trained RNA language model · Performance comparison of 2OMe-LM with existing predictors on the independent test set. a; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 2 NmRF, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 3 BERT2OME, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 4 H2Opred, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 5 Meta-2OM, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 6 2OMe-LM, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC

Evaluation design

Benchmarks bring together tasks and protocols. A task describes the biological question; a protocol defines a particular test.

These source-backed links do not make different protocols or scores interchangeable.

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Baseline coverage

Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.

0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.

No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.

No reviewed evaluations with results linked in this release.

Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.

Null control

Proposed control: requires review

Select a task-valid null control after reviewing inputs and metric

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Conventional reference

Proposed control: requires review

Select an upstream conventional reference after reviewing the full protocol

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Protocol coverage CSV · Model evaluation matrix · Source table · Release and checksums

Coverage is derived from release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Strengths and limitations

Strengths and considerations

No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.

Limitations and conditions

No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.

Profile review details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction.

Stable record: paper-protocol-d933438afda70a21ef

Specifications

Inputs, training, access and other details

Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.

Data, procedure and scoring
PropertyDescription and evidence
DatasetsNot extracted or verified for this record.
OrganismsNot extracted or verified for this record.
AssaysNot extracted or verified for this record.
SplitsNot extracted or verified for this record.
Allowed inputsNot extracted or verified for this record.
AdaptationNot extracted or verified for this record.
MetricsNot extracted or verified for this record.
BaselinesNot extracted or verified for this record.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Papers and result coverage

Last literature check: 2026-09-17. Dated primary-source discovery and protocol/table screening. Source checking does not mean experimental reproduction. Only separately extracted and independently reviewed numeric batches are publishable.

Paper or primary resourceVersionReference
2OMe-LM: predicting 2′-O-methylation sites in human RNA using a pre-trained RNA language modeljournal full text in PMCRead source
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf417
Historical gaps recorded on 2026-09-17

The catalogue now holds 35 result rows for this benchmark. A note below about pending extraction describes the state on 2026-09-17 and may since have been answered by a later batch. The result rows and their sources are the current record.

  • exact checkpoint hashes and per-method scored denominators: Table labels alone do not establish these fields; do not infer checkpoint or scored count from model name or dataset size.
Search and extraction details

complete tables extracted

Searches

  • 2OMe-LM: predicting 2′-O-methylation sites in human RNA using a pre-trained RNA language model 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf417

Evidence locations

  • Performance comparison of 2OMe-LM with existing predictors on the independent test set. a; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 2 NmRF, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 3 BERT2OME, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 4 H2Opred, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 5 Meta-2OM, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 6 2OMe-LM, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

3 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Evaluation in this paper
41-nt centred RNA windows; balanced 8,037 positive and 8,037 negative samples after 80% identity filtering, then 8:2 train/test division. Held-out independent test set.
Individual claims
2OMe-LM: predicting 2′-O-methylation sites in human RNA using a pre-trained RNA language model

Original source ↗

Performance comparison of 2OMe-LM with existing predictors on the independent test set. a; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 2 NmRF, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 3 BERT2OME, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 4 H2Opred, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 5 Meta-2OM, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 6 2OMe-LM, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:33:38.332Z

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.sections.0.body

Source artifact SHA-256: 54fe4db6f35c03d0d4f3ef4da720eb26a832199372c56d0956609ff07af750ee

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Introduction
Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set · ACC. 41-nt centred RNA windows; balanced 8,037 positive and 8,037 negative samples after 80% identity filtering, then 8:2 train/test division. Held-out independent test set.
Individual claims
2OMe-LM: predicting 2′-O-methylation sites in human RNA using a pre-trained RNA language model

Original source ↗

Performance comparison of 2OMe-LM with existing predictors on the independent test set. a; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 2 NmRF, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 3 BERT2OME, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 4 H2Opred, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 5 Meta-2OM, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 6 2OMe-LM, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:33:38.332Z

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.summary

Source artifact SHA-256: 54fe4db6f35c03d0d4f3ef4da720eb26a832199372c56d0956609ff07af750ee

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Relationship: evaluates task
reported-task-82fc7843f07324
Individual claims
2OMe-LM: predicting 2′-O-methylation sites in human RNA using a pre-trained RNA language model

Original source ↗

Performance comparison of 2OMe-LM with existing predictors on the independent test set. a; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 2 NmRF, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 3 BERT2OME, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 4 H2Opred, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 5 Meta-2OM, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 6 2OMe-LM, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:33:38.332Z

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Field: links:evaluates_task:reported-task-82fc7843f07324

Claim: paper-claim-49edd508eb9e7f56c9

Source artifact SHA-256: 54fe4db6f35c03d0d4f3ef4da720eb26a832199372c56d0956609ff07af750ee

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: needs review

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: paper-protocol-d933438afda70a21ef

areas
rna-transcriptomes
tasks
human RNA 2-prime-O-methylation site prediction
entity level
protocol
protocol
41-nt centred RNA windows; balanced 8,037 positive and 8,037 negative samples after 80% identity filtering, then 8:2 train/test division. Held-out independent test set.
comparison panels
id: 2ome-lm-2025-btaf417-t2-accuracy; title: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set · ACC; protocol id: paper-protocol-d933438afda70a21ef; dataset id: paper-dataset-64b51e2f952f2c1c09; metric: ACC; unit: fraction; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-6cd0c965571a51b666; paper-result-0a3793081d7daa05a3; paper-result-90076f457aae558dd0; paper-result-6f26b2a32012628065; paper-result-172c48ff6795f50b97; source ids: 2ome-lm-2025; source locator: Performance comparison of 2OMe-LM with existing predictors on the independent test set. a; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 2 NmRF, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 3 BERT2OME, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 4 H2Opred, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 5 Meta-2OM, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 6 2OMe-LM, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; context: 41-nt centred RNA windows; balanced 8,037 positive and 8,037 negative samples after 80% identity filtering, then 8:2 train/test division. Held-out independent test set.; caveats: Do not pool cross-validation and independent-test scores. The 8:2 ratio is not converted into an exact test count. Training-data overlap for pre-existing predictors is not established by this table. Origins are labelled per method; appearance in one table does not constitute independent replication of every model.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: 2ome-lm-2025-btaf417-t2-F1; title: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set · F1-score; protocol id: paper-protocol-d933438afda70a21ef; dataset id: paper-dataset-64b51e2f952f2c1c09; metric: F1-score; unit: fraction; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-2901879d63427fece0; paper-result-703d9f2e0a92c08138; paper-result-1f1eb13ac1d3b0659c; paper-result-d219017e57658f8194; paper-result-a6ed9c1d07e0a8e3ac; source ids: 2ome-lm-2025; source locator: Performance comparison of 2OMe-LM with existing predictors on the independent test set. a; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 2 NmRF, column 3: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set F1-score; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 3 BERT2OME, column 3: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set F1-score; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 4 H2Opred, column 3: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set F1-score; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 5 Meta-2OM, column 3: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set F1-score; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 6 2OMe-LM, column 3: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set F1-score; context: 41-nt centred RNA windows; balanced 8,037 positive and 8,037 negative samples after 80% identity filtering, then 8:2 train/test division. Held-out independent test set.; caveats: Do not pool cross-validation and independent-test scores. The 8:2 ratio is not converted into an exact test count. Training-data overlap for pre-existing predictors is not established by this table. Origins are labelled per method; appearance in one table does not constitute independent replication of every model.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: 2ome-lm-2025-btaf417-t2-precision; title: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set · Precision; protocol id: paper-protocol-d933438afda70a21ef; dataset id: paper-dataset-64b51e2f952f2c1c09; metric: Precision; unit: fraction; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-657a6c49b38ef8252b; paper-result-6489236abf51572541; paper-result-a070ec6c349b5e96ef; paper-result-2d7677257f873b4e29; paper-result-b90e8cd12cecf6951f; source ids: 2ome-lm-2025; source locator: Performance comparison of 2OMe-LM with existing predictors on the independent test set. a; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 2 NmRF, column 4: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set Precision; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 3 BERT2OME, column 4: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set Precision; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 4 H2Opred, column 4: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set Precision; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 5 Meta-2OM, column 4: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set Precision; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 6 2OMe-LM, column 4: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set Precision; context: 41-nt centred RNA windows; balanced 8,037 positive and 8,037 negative samples after 80% identity filtering, then 8:2 train/test division. Held-out independent test set.; caveats: Do not pool cross-validation and independent-test scores. The 8:2 ratio is not converted into an exact test count. Training-data overlap for pre-existing predictors is not established by this table. Origins are labelled per method; appearance in one table does not constitute independent replication of every model.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: 2ome-lm-2025-btaf417-t2-recall; title: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set · Recall; protocol id: paper-protocol-d933438afda70a21ef; dataset id: paper-dataset-64b51e2f952f2c1c09; metric: Recall; unit: fraction; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-eb25b223c10be4f330; paper-result-c8c5c199a2b0059317; paper-result-fab2a73ce6d700ff87; paper-result-7c85e27954addc7e14; paper-result-9980f6cb88d2219b02; source ids: 2ome-lm-2025; source locator: Performance comparison of 2OMe-LM with existing predictors on the independent test set. a; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 2 NmRF, column 5: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set Recall; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 3 BERT2OME, column 5: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set Recall; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 4 H2Opred, column 5: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set Recall; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 5 Meta-2OM, column 5: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set Recall; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 6 2OMe-LM, column 5: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set Recall; context: 41-nt centred RNA windows; balanced 8,037 positive and 8,037 negative samples after 80% identity filtering, then 8:2 train/test division. Held-out independent test set.; caveats: Do not pool cross-validation and independent-test scores. The 8:2 ratio is not converted into an exact test count. Training-data overlap for pre-existing predictors is not established by this table. Origins are labelled per method; appearance in one table does not constitute independent replication of every model.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: 2ome-lm-2025-btaf417-t2-AUROC; title: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set · AUC; protocol id: paper-protocol-d933438afda70a21ef; dataset id: paper-dataset-64b51e2f952f2c1c09; metric: AUC; unit: fraction; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-48c539e46e8e0de49c; paper-result-c5e158015fb2c59552; paper-result-da8a9134bd3530143b; paper-result-ce07a0b8b72a4068f5; paper-result-76e7297a1974a4704a; source ids: 2ome-lm-2025; source locator: Performance comparison of 2OMe-LM with existing predictors on the independent test set. a; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 2 NmRF, column 6: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set AUC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 3 BERT2OME, column 6: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set AUC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 4 H2Opred, column 6: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set AUC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 5 Meta-2OM, column 6: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set AUC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 6 2OMe-LM, column 6: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set AUC; context: 41-nt centred RNA windows; balanced 8,037 positive and 8,037 negative samples after 80% identity filtering, then 8:2 train/test division. Held-out independent test set.; caveats: Do not pool cross-validation and independent-test scores. The 8:2 ratio is not converted into an exact test count. Training-data overlap for pre-existing predictors is not established by this table. Origins are labelled per method; appearance in one table does not constitute independent replication of every model.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: 2ome-lm-2025-btaf417-t2-AUPRC; title: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set · AUPR; protocol id: paper-protocol-d933438afda70a21ef; dataset id: paper-dataset-64b51e2f952f2c1c09; metric: AUPR; unit: fraction; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-cf762cdb6f3083c1e5; paper-result-ea74464791a87509df; paper-result-79788c7d80922dad49; paper-result-209a40abae677db031; paper-result-13e1c3729d85f66b41; source ids: 2ome-lm-2025; source locator: Performance comparison of 2OMe-LM with existing predictors on the independent test set. a; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 2 NmRF, column 7: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set AUPR; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 3 BERT2OME, column 7: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set AUPR; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 4 H2Opred, column 7: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set AUPR; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 5 Meta-2OM, column 7: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set AUPR; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 6 2OMe-LM, column 7: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set AUPR; context: 41-nt centred RNA windows; balanced 8,037 positive and 8,037 negative samples after 80% identity filtering, then 8:2 train/test division. Held-out independent test set.; caveats: Do not pool cross-validation and independent-test scores. The 8:2 ratio is not converted into an exact test count. Training-data overlap for pre-existing predictors is not established by this table. Origins are labelled per method; appearance in one table does not constitute independent replication of every model.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: 2ome-lm-2025-btaf417-t2-MCC; title: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set · MCC; protocol id: paper-protocol-d933438afda70a21ef; dataset id: paper-dataset-64b51e2f952f2c1c09; metric: MCC; unit: unitless; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-acad7ffaf81174cddb; paper-result-d947e45a8a87762a5f; paper-result-abe41dfecafe879c49; paper-result-85be9319f746a0dd77; paper-result-e68cc241f300063bca; source ids: 2ome-lm-2025; source locator: Performance comparison of 2OMe-LM with existing predictors on the independent test set. a; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 2 NmRF, column 8: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set MCC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 3 BERT2OME, column 8: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set MCC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 4 H2Opred, column 8: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set MCC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 5 Meta-2OM, column 8: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set MCC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 6 2OMe-LM, column 8: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set MCC; context: 41-nt centred RNA windows; balanced 8,037 positive and 8,037 negative samples after 80% identity filtering, then 8:2 train/test division. Held-out independent test set.; caveats: Do not pool cross-validation and independent-test scores. The 8:2 ratio is not converted into an exact test count. Training-data overlap for pre-existing predictors is not established by this table. Origins are labelled per method; appearance in one table does not constitute independent replication of every model.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17
benchmark research
review date: 2026-09-17; status: complete_tables_extracted; primary sources: 2ome-lm-2025; inspected locators: Performance comparison of 2OMe-LM with existing predictors on the independent test set. a; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 2 NmRF, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 3 BERT2OME, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 4 H2Opred, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 5 Meta-2OM, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 6 2OMe-LM, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; searched queries: 2OMe-LM: predicting 2′-O-methylation sites in human RNA using a pre-trained RNA language model 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf417; gaps: exact checkpoint hashes and per-method scored denominators: Table labels alone do not establish these fields; do not infer checkpoint or scored count from model name or dataset size.; claim scope: Dated primary-source discovery and protocol/table screening. Source checking does not mean experimental reproduction. Only separately extracted and independently reviewed numeric batches are publishable.
legacy kinds
benchmark
entity classification
review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: The source-backed record identifies a specified evaluated procedure and its dataset/split/scoring context. Classify it as a protocol while preserving version and comparison restrictions.; source ids: 2ome-lm-2025; source locator: Performance comparison of 2OMe-LM with existing predictors on the independent test set. a; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 2 NmRF, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 3 BERT2OME, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 4 H2Opred, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 5 Meta-2OM, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; Table 2. (btaf417-T2), row 6 2OMe-LM, column 2: Human RNA 2OMe sites, independent test set ACC; ambiguities: None recorded
Related records

Suggest a correction