Protocol

DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block)

Rank each DEKOIS 2.0 target's 40 actives and 1200 property-matched decoys by rescoring the top-ranked of five Protenix-predicted complexes, and report AUROC, BEDROC and enrichment factors averaged over targets.

13 evaluations · 130 results

Overview

An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

13 recorded evaluations, 130 metric rows. A comparison chart has not yet been validated for these results. The table retains the individual findings and their sources.

View coverage and remaining gaps across all benchmarks

Results

Results are available, but no reviewed comparison panel is linked in this release.

All evaluations

13 evaluations · 130 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Tested model or methodProtocolDatasetEvaluation setupMetricEvidence origin

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configuration	Protocol and dataset	Finding	Evidence and details
Configuration: Protenix (ipTM) as a screening score	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	0.795 AUROC (AUROC, mean over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source ipTM on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'ipTM', column 'AUROC' (Mean)
Configuration: Protenix (ipTM) as a screening score	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	0.837 AUROC (AUROC, median over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source ipTM on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'ipTM', column 'AUROC' (Med)
Configuration: Protenix (ipTM) as a screening score	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	0.507 Bedroc (BEDROC with alpha = 80.5, mean over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source ipTM on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'ipTM', column 'BEDROC (α = 80.5)' (Mean)
Configuration: Protenix (ipTM) as a screening score	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	0.553 Bedroc (BEDROC with alpha = 80.5, median over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source ipTM on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'ipTM', column 'BEDROC (α = 80.5)' (Med)
Configuration: Protenix (ipTM) as a screening score	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	18.4 Enrichment factor (EF at the top 0.5% of the ranked library, mean over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source ipTM on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'ipTM', column 'EF0.5%' (Mean)
Configuration: Protenix (ipTM) as a screening score	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	22.1 Enrichment factor (EF at the top 0.5% of the ranked library, median over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source ipTM on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'ipTM', column 'EF0.5%' (Med)
Configuration: Protenix (ipTM) as a screening score	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	16.8 Enrichment factor (EF at the top 1% of the ranked library, mean over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source ipTM on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'ipTM', column 'EF1%' (Mean)
Configuration: Protenix (ipTM) as a screening score	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	16.7 Enrichment factor (EF at the top 1% of the ranked library, median over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source ipTM on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'ipTM', column 'EF1%' (Med)
Configuration: Protenix (ipTM) as a screening score	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	8.84 Enrichment factor (EF at the top 5% of the ranked library, mean over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source ipTM on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'ipTM', column 'EF5%' (Mean)
Configuration: Protenix (ipTM) as a screening score	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	9.5 Enrichment factor (EF at the top 5% of the ranked library, median over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source ipTM on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'ipTM', column 'EF5%' (Med)
Configuration: Glide_SP rescoring of Protenix top-ranked poses	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	0.785 AUROC (AUROC, mean over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Glide_SP on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'Glide_SP', column 'AUROC' (Mean)
Configuration: Glide_SP rescoring of Protenix top-ranked poses	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	0.811 AUROC (AUROC, median over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Glide_SP on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'Glide_SP', column 'AUROC' (Med)
Configuration: Glide_SP rescoring of Protenix top-ranked poses	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	0.39 Bedroc (BEDROC with alpha = 80.5, mean over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Glide_SP on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'Glide_SP', column 'BEDROC (α = 80.5)' (Mean)
Configuration: Glide_SP rescoring of Protenix top-ranked poses	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	0.366 Bedroc (BEDROC with alpha = 80.5, median over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Glide_SP on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'Glide_SP', column 'BEDROC (α = 80.5)' (Med)
Configuration: Glide_SP rescoring of Protenix top-ranked poses	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	14.5 Enrichment factor (EF at the top 0.5% of the ranked library, mean over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Glide_SP on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'Glide_SP', column 'EF0.5%' (Mean)
Configuration: Glide_SP rescoring of Protenix top-ranked poses	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	13.3 Enrichment factor (EF at the top 0.5% of the ranked library, median over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Glide_SP on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'Glide_SP', column 'EF0.5%' (Med)
Configuration: Glide_SP rescoring of Protenix top-ranked poses	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	12.7 Enrichment factor (EF at the top 1% of the ranked library, mean over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Glide_SP on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'Glide_SP', column 'EF1%' (Mean)
Configuration: Glide_SP rescoring of Protenix top-ranked poses	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	11.9 Enrichment factor (EF at the top 1% of the ranked library, median over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Glide_SP on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'Glide_SP', column 'EF1%' (Med)
Configuration: Glide_SP rescoring of Protenix top-ranked poses	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	7.23 Enrichment factor (EF at the top 5% of the ranked library, mean over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Glide_SP on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'Glide_SP', column 'EF5%' (Mean)
Configuration: Glide_SP rescoring of Protenix top-ranked poses	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	6.5 Enrichment factor (EF at the top 5% of the ranked library, median over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Glide_SP on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'Glide_SP', column 'EF5%' (Med)
Configuration: Glide_XP rescoring of Protenix top-ranked poses	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	0.792 AUROC (AUROC, mean over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Glide_XP on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'Glide_XP', column 'AUROC' (Mean)
Configuration: Glide_XP rescoring of Protenix top-ranked poses	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	0.817 AUROC (AUROC, median over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Glide_XP on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'Glide_XP', column 'AUROC' (Med)
Configuration: Glide_XP rescoring of Protenix top-ranked poses	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	0.394 Bedroc (BEDROC with alpha = 80.5, mean over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Glide_XP on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'Glide_XP', column 'BEDROC (α = 80.5)' (Mean)
Configuration: Glide_XP rescoring of Protenix top-ranked poses	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	0.371 Bedroc (BEDROC with alpha = 80.5, median over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Glide_XP on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'Glide_XP', column 'BEDROC (α = 80.5)' (Med)
Configuration: Glide_XP rescoring of Protenix top-ranked poses	Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring Protenix-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, Protenix block) Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025	14.7 Enrichment factor (EF at the top 0.5% of the ranked library, mean over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Glide_XP on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2) hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix Aggregation: Not reported Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, Protenix block, row 'Glide_XP', column 'EF0.5%' (Mean)

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Explore all linked results

Baseline coverage

Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.

0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.

No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.

Author-reported evaluations: 13

Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.

Null control

Proposed control: requires review

Select a task-valid null control after reviewing inputs and metric

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Conventional reference

Proposed control: requires review

Select an upstream conventional reference after reviewing the full protocol

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Protocol coverage CSV (gzip) · Model evaluation matrix (gzip) · Source table (gzip) · Release and checksums (gzip)

Coverage is derived from release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statement	Original source and location	Review and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

How to read the evidence

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release history

Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Original source · PMC12704515 (Chem Sci, published 2025-12-11)

Download this release (gzip)

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-protenix

areas: molecular-interactions
contexts: research
task: Protein-ligand virtual screening (library ranking)
publication status: peer_reviewed
review: method: scope-review; automated-source-review; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Claude review agent, independent of the extraction agent; no human review claimed; date: 2026-10-22; method note: Read the record against the pinned sources and against docs/use-cases.md and docs/record-contract.md.; note: Record checked against the pinned source and the record contract. Transcription checked; not reproduced and not reviewed by a human scientist.; artifact sha256: 11a4cee97057d9e72f9393024d22fdd169e3134f493367eee2f7869facf9ccf8; retrieval url: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12704515/fullTextXML; receipt: data/omics/use-case-coverage-hitdisc-20261022/review.json
metric: enrichment-factor
metric direction: higher
unit: unitless
metric qualifier: mean and median over the DEKOIS 2.0 targets
metric definition: AUROC, BEDROC with alpha = 80.5 (the top 2% of the ranked list contributes 80% of the score), and enrichment factors at 0.5%, 1% and 5%, each reported as the mean and the median over targets. EFx% is the ratio of true positives found in the top x% of the ranked compounds relative to random selection.
protocol: Five complexes predicted per protein-ligand pair with Protenix; the pose ranked first by the Protenix ranking score is kept, prepared with the Protein Preparation Wizard, and rescored. A structure that remained unrecognisable was given an extremely low score.
denominator: 79
version: Shen et al. 2025, Table 2, Protenix block
source locator: Table 2, Protenix block
limitations: Enrichment factors depend on the actives-to-inactives ratio and on how the negatives were built, which differ by more than an order of magnitude between the benchmarks in this store (1:30 for DEKOIS 2.0, 1:50 for GPCRrecent, and from about 1:43 to about 1:200 across the five LIT-PCBA targets scored here, reaching about 1:18000 for LIT-PCBA ADRB2). Values from different protocols are not comparable.; The decoys are property-matched synthetic molecules, not assayed inactives.; The Protenix ipTM row (and, for AF3, Min-iPAE) repeats the value printed in Table 1 for the same configuration; it is the co-folding score rather than a rescoring arm, and is kept here because it is a printed cell of this table.; Structures that could not be processed were assigned an extremely low score rather than excluded, which affects every rescoring row.
scope note: Retrospective: the method ranks a curated set of actives and negatives that were assembled before the evaluation, not compounds selected and then tested.

Related records

evaluates task: Protein–ligand virtual screening
uses data: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025
part of: DEKOIS 2.0
assessment: ipTM on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2)
assessment: Glide_SP on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2)
assessment: Glide_XP on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2)
assessment: Gnina (AD4) on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2)
assessment: Gnina (CNNaffinity) on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2)
assessment: Gnina (CNNscore) on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2)
assessment: Gnina (Vina) on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2)
assessment: Gnina (Vinardo) on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2)
assessment: IGModel (pkd) on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2)
assessment: IGModel (rmsd) on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2)
assessment: PIGNet2 on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2)
assessment: PLANET on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2)
assessment: RTMScore on Protenix-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2)
assessed by: Find hits for a target by virtual screening

Suggest a correction