rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Protocol

Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)

Fine-tuned scores for the same tasks, taken from benchmark or model reports where available and marked by the authors as reference values.

72 evaluations · 72 results

Overview

An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

72 recorded evaluations, 72 metric rows. A comparison chart has not yet been validated for these results. The table retains the individual findings and their sources.

View coverage and remaining gaps across all benchmarks

Results

Results are available, but no reviewed comparison panel is linked in this release.

All evaluations

72 evaluations · 72 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1) · Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)

Sorted by F1 (NT benchmark Promoter All, reference fine-tuned score) (higher is better). The best value in each column is highlighted. Decimals are rounded for display; each value links to the printed value and its source.

Tested configurationF1 (NT benchmark Promoter All, reference fine-tuned score)F1 (NT benchmark Promoter Non-TATA, reference fine-tuned score)F1 (NT benchmark Promoter TATA, reference fine-tuned score)F1 (NT benchmark Splice Acceptor, reference fine-tuned score)F1 (NT benchmark Splice All, reference fine-tuned score)F1 (NT benchmark Splice Donor, reference fine-tuned score)MCC (NT benchmark Enhancer Types, reference fine-tuned score)MCC (NT benchmark Enhancer, reference fine-tuned score)MCC (NT benchmark H3, reference fine-tuned score)MCC (NT benchmark H3K14ac, reference fine-tuned score)MCC (NT benchmark H3K36me3, reference fine-tuned score)MCC (NT benchmark H3K4me1, reference fine-tuned score)MCC (NT benchmark H3K4me2, reference fine-tuned score)MCC (NT benchmark H3K4me3, reference fine-tuned score)MCC (NT benchmark H3K79me3, reference fine-tuned score)MCC (NT benchmark H3K9ac, reference fine-tuned score)MCC (NT benchmark H4, reference fine-tuned score)MCC (NT benchmark H4ac, reference fine-tuned score)
NT-500M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Evaluation0.976 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Omni-DNA-116M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Evaluation0.973Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Evaluation0.962Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Evaluation0.96Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.58Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.477Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.806Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.605Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.657Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.553Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.424Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.512Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.67Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.612Not reportedNot reported
GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.815 (best in column)Not reported
GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.592
GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reported0.962Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reported0.948Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.981 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.978Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.978Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.517Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.386Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.779Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.612Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.613Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.512Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.455Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.549Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.672Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.581Not reportedNot reported
HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.763Not reported
HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.564
HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reported0.959Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reported0.944Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.958Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.956Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.949Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
NT-500M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.548Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
NT-500M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.424Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
NT-500M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.784Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
NT-500M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.551Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
NT-500M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.625Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
NT-500M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.55Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
NT-500M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.319Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
NT-500M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.41Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
NT-500M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.672Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
NT-500M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.562Not reportedNot reported
NT-500M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.799Not reported
NT-500M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.495
NT-500M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reported0.976 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
NT-500M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reported0.966Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
NT-500M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.981 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
NT-500M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.983 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
NT-500M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.985 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Omni-DNA-116M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.593 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Omni-DNA-116M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.498 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Omni-DNA-116M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.818 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Omni-DNA-116M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.685 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Omni-DNA-116M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.661 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Omni-DNA-116M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.577 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Omni-DNA-116M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.576 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Omni-DNA-116M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.587 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Omni-DNA-116M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.718 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
Omni-DNA-116M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.658 (best in column)Not reportedNot reported
Omni-DNA-116M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.802Not reported
Omni-DNA-116M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.663 (best in column)
Omni-DNA-116M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reported0.972Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Omni-DNA-116M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reported0.967 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Omni-DNA-116M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.968Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Omni-DNA-116M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.927Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Omni-DNA-116M, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)EvaluationNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.951Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
All 72 result rows with coverage, uncertainty and sources
Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.58 MCC (NT benchmark Enhancer, reference fine-tuned score)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

GENERATOR-v2-1.2B on NT benchmark Enhancer (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'Enhancer', column 'GENERATOR-v2', FT value
Configuration: GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.477 MCC (NT benchmark Enhancer Types, reference fine-tuned score)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

GENERATOR-v2-1.2B on NT benchmark Enhancer Types (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'Enhancer Types', column 'GENERATOR-v2', FT value
Configuration: GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.806 MCC (NT benchmark H3, reference fine-tuned score)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

GENERATOR-v2-1.2B on NT benchmark H3 (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'H3', column 'GENERATOR-v2', FT value
Configuration: GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.605 MCC (NT benchmark H3K14ac, reference fine-tuned score)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

GENERATOR-v2-1.2B on NT benchmark H3K14ac (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'H3K14ac', column 'GENERATOR-v2', FT value
Configuration: GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.657 MCC (NT benchmark H3K36me3, reference fine-tuned score)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

GENERATOR-v2-1.2B on NT benchmark H3K36me3 (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'H3K36me3', column 'GENERATOR-v2', FT value
Configuration: GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.553 MCC (NT benchmark H3K4me1, reference fine-tuned score)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

GENERATOR-v2-1.2B on NT benchmark H3K4me1 (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'H3K4me1', column 'GENERATOR-v2', FT value
Configuration: GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.424 MCC (NT benchmark H3K4me2, reference fine-tuned score)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

GENERATOR-v2-1.2B on NT benchmark H3K4me2 (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'H3K4me2', column 'GENERATOR-v2', FT value
Configuration: GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.512 MCC (NT benchmark H3K4me3, reference fine-tuned score)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

GENERATOR-v2-1.2B on NT benchmark H3K4me3 (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'H3K4me3', column 'GENERATOR-v2', FT value
Configuration: GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.67 MCC (NT benchmark H3K79me3, reference fine-tuned score)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

GENERATOR-v2-1.2B on NT benchmark H3K79me3 (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'H3K79me3', column 'GENERATOR-v2', FT value
Configuration: GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.612 MCC (NT benchmark H3K9ac, reference fine-tuned score)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

GENERATOR-v2-1.2B on NT benchmark H3K9ac (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'H3K9ac', column 'GENERATOR-v2', FT value
Configuration: GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.815 MCC (NT benchmark H4, reference fine-tuned score)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

GENERATOR-v2-1.2B on NT benchmark H4 (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'H4', column 'GENERATOR-v2', FT value
Configuration: GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.592 MCC (NT benchmark H4ac, reference fine-tuned score)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

GENERATOR-v2-1.2B on NT benchmark H4ac (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'H4ac', column 'GENERATOR-v2', FT value
Configuration: GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.962 F1 (NT benchmark Promoter All, reference fine-tuned score)
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

GENERATOR-v2-1.2B on NT benchmark Promoter All (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'Promoter All', column 'GENERATOR-v2', FT value
Configuration: GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.962 F1 (NT benchmark Promoter Non-TATA, reference fine-tuned score)
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

GENERATOR-v2-1.2B on NT benchmark Promoter Non-TATA (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'Promoter Non-TATA', column 'GENERATOR-v2', FT value
Configuration: GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.948 F1 (NT benchmark Promoter TATA, reference fine-tuned score)
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

GENERATOR-v2-1.2B on NT benchmark Promoter TATA (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'Promoter TATA', column 'GENERATOR-v2', FT value
Configuration: GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.981 F1 (NT benchmark Splice Acceptor, reference fine-tuned score)
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

GENERATOR-v2-1.2B on NT benchmark Splice Acceptor (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'Splice Acceptor', column 'GENERATOR-v2', FT value
Configuration: GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.978 F1 (NT benchmark Splice All, reference fine-tuned score)
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

GENERATOR-v2-1.2B on NT benchmark Splice All (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'Splice All', column 'GENERATOR-v2', FT value
Configuration: GENERATOR-v2-1.2B, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.978 F1 (NT benchmark Splice Donor, reference fine-tuned score)
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

GENERATOR-v2-1.2B on NT benchmark Splice Donor (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'Splice Donor', column 'GENERATOR-v2', FT value
Configuration: HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.517 MCC (NT benchmark Enhancer, reference fine-tuned score)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: ± 0.117 (type not stated). Table 1 does not define the spread on reference fine-tuned scores; Section 3.3 defines only the frozen-probe spread

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

HyenaDNA-436K on NT benchmark Enhancer (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'Enhancer', column 'HyenaDNA', FT value
Configuration: HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.386 MCC (NT benchmark Enhancer Types, reference fine-tuned score)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: ± 0.185 (type not stated). Table 1 does not define the spread on reference fine-tuned scores; Section 3.3 defines only the frozen-probe spread

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

HyenaDNA-436K on NT benchmark Enhancer Types (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'Enhancer Types', column 'HyenaDNA', FT value
Configuration: HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.779 MCC (NT benchmark H3, reference fine-tuned score)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: ± 0.037 (type not stated). Table 1 does not define the spread on reference fine-tuned scores; Section 3.3 defines only the frozen-probe spread

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

HyenaDNA-436K on NT benchmark H3 (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'H3', column 'HyenaDNA', FT value
Configuration: HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.612 MCC (NT benchmark H3K14ac, reference fine-tuned score)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: ± 0.065 (type not stated). Table 1 does not define the spread on reference fine-tuned scores; Section 3.3 defines only the frozen-probe spread

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

HyenaDNA-436K on NT benchmark H3K14ac (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'H3K14ac', column 'HyenaDNA', FT value
Configuration: HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.613 MCC (NT benchmark H3K36me3, reference fine-tuned score)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: ± 0.041 (type not stated). Table 1 does not define the spread on reference fine-tuned scores; Section 3.3 defines only the frozen-probe spread

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

HyenaDNA-436K on NT benchmark H3K36me3 (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'H3K36me3', column 'HyenaDNA', FT value
Configuration: HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.512 MCC (NT benchmark H3K4me1, reference fine-tuned score)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: ± 0.024 (type not stated). Table 1 does not define the spread on reference fine-tuned scores; Section 3.3 defines only the frozen-probe spread

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

HyenaDNA-436K on NT benchmark H3K4me1 (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'H3K4me1', column 'HyenaDNA', FT value
Configuration: HyenaDNA-436K, fine-tuned reference score (Datta et al. 2026)Protocol: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark, reference fine-tuned scores (Datta et al. 2026 Table 1)
Dataset: Nucleotide Transformer benchmark task data (Datta et al. 2026)
0.455 MCC (NT benchmark H3K4me2, reference fine-tuned score)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: ± 0.095 (type not stated). Table 1 does not define the spread on reference fine-tuned scores; Section 3.3 defines only the frozen-probe spread

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

HyenaDNA-436K on NT benchmark H3K4me2 (reference fine-tuned)

gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

Aggregation: Not reported

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models · Table 1, row 'H3K4me2', column 'HyenaDNA', FT value

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Explore all linked results

Baseline coverage

Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.

0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.

No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.

unreported
72

Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.

Null control

Proposed control: requires review

Select a task-valid null control after reviewing inputs and metric

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Conventional reference

Proposed control: requires review

Select an upstream conventional reference after reviewing the full protocol

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Protocol coverage CSV (gzip) · Model evaluation matrix (gzip) · Source table (gzip) · Release and checksums (gzip)

Coverage is derived from release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: gfm2-20261011-datta2026-protocol-fine-tuned-reference

areas
dna-genomes
contexts
research
protocol
Fine-tuned scores as printed in the 'FT' position of each Table 1 cell. The authors state these are benchmark- or model-reported where available and are provenance-marked reference values rather than fully matched head-to-head comparisons.
version
Table 1, 'FT' value of each cell
metric implementation
MCC for enhancer and histone-mark tasks, F1 for promoter and splice-site tasks (Section 3.2)
aggregation
As reported by the cited benchmark or model source
limitations
Frozen-probe scores come from the authors' unified protocol; the fine-tuned column is benchmark- or model-reported where available and the authors mark it as a reference value, not a matched head-to-head comparison (Sections 2.7 and 3.3).; Frozen scores are mean and standard deviation over five seeds with the probe selected on the diagnostic test grid for most tables; the authors treat grid-best figures as readout-sensitivity analyses rather than unbiased model selection (Sections 2.5 and 3.3).; Table 1 covers four of the five models in the study; DNABERT-2 is absent from it and appears in Tables 2, 7, 8 and 9.; Who ran each fine-tuned score is not stated per cell, so these evaluations are recorded with origin 'unreported'.; Fine-tuning protocol, epochs and selection are not printed for these reference values.; Table 4 shows that Table 1's frozen values are diagnostic test-set grid-best scores: five of seven HyenaDNA tasks match the grid-best column exactly. They are maxima over the test grid, not validation-selected estimates.
source locator
Table 1; Sections 2.7 and 3.3
Related records

Suggest a correction