rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Protocol

Genus-level read classification of ONT bacterial isolates, main database (Peres da Silva et al. 2024)

Per-isolate sensitivity, precision and F1 of read assignments at genus level, averaged across isolates; reported for all isolates, species in the database and species out of the database, and by number of species per genus.

3 evaluations · 6 results

Overview

An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

3 recorded evaluations, 6 metric rows. A comparison chart has not yet been validated for these results. The table retains the individual findings and their sources.

View coverage and remaining gaps across all benchmarks

Results

Results are available, but no reviewed comparison panel is linked in this release.

All evaluations

3 evaluations · 6 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Protocol: Genus-level read classification of ONT bacterial isolates, main database (Peres da Silva et al. 2024) · Dataset: ONT reads from 81 bacterial isolates (Peres da Silva et al. 2024)

Sorted by F1 (genus level; mean across all 81 isolates (species in and out of the database)) (higher is better). The best value in each column is highlighted. Decimals are rounded for display; each value links to the printed value and its source.

Tested configurationF1 (genus level; mean across all 81 isolates (species in and out of the database))Recall (genus level; mean across all 81 isolates (species in and out of the database))F1 (genus level; mean across the out-of-database isolates whose genus has more than three species)Recall (genus level; mean across the out-of-database isolates whose genus has more than three species)
MMseqs2 (main database, Peres da Silva et al. 2024)Evaluation0.85 (best in column)0.81 (best in column)Not reportedNot reported
Kraken2 (main database, Peres da Silva et al. 2024)Evaluation0.830.79Not reportedNot reported
MetageNN (main database, Peres da Silva et al. 2024)EvaluationNot reportedNot reported0.880.87
All 6 result rows with coverage, uncertainty and sources
Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: Kraken2 (main database, Peres da Silva et al. 2024)Protocol: Genus-level read classification of ONT bacterial isolates, main database (Peres da Silva et al. 2024)
Dataset: ONT reads from 81 bacterial isolates (Peres da Silva et al. 2024)
0.83 F1 (genus level; mean across all 81 isolates (species in and out of the database))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 shows standard-deviation error bars; no value is printed in the text

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Kraken2 on genus-level read classification of ONT bacterial isolates, main database (Peres da Silva et al. 2024)

dna-pathogen-20261012-metagenn-protocol-isolates

Aggregation: Not reported

MetageNN: a memory-efficient neural network taxonomic classifier robust to sequencing errors and missing genomes · Results 'Results for all genomes' paragraph 1, sentence 4 (values shown in Fig. 3a)
Configuration: Kraken2 (main database, Peres da Silva et al. 2024)Protocol: Genus-level read classification of ONT bacterial isolates, main database (Peres da Silva et al. 2024)
Dataset: ONT reads from 81 bacterial isolates (Peres da Silva et al. 2024)
0.79 Recall (genus level; mean across all 81 isolates (species in and out of the database))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 shows standard-deviation error bars; no value is printed in the text

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Kraken2 on genus-level read classification of ONT bacterial isolates, main database (Peres da Silva et al. 2024)

dna-pathogen-20261012-metagenn-protocol-isolates

Aggregation: Not reported

MetageNN: a memory-efficient neural network taxonomic classifier robust to sequencing errors and missing genomes · Results 'Results for all genomes' paragraph 1, sentence 4 (values shown in Fig. 3a)
Configuration: MetageNN (main database, Peres da Silva et al. 2024)Protocol: Genus-level read classification of ONT bacterial isolates, main database (Peres da Silva et al. 2024)
Dataset: ONT reads from 81 bacterial isolates (Peres da Silva et al. 2024)
0.88 F1 (genus level; mean across the out-of-database isolates whose genus has more than three species)
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 shows standard-deviation error bars; no value is printed in the text

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetageNN on genus-level read classification of ONT bacterial isolates, main database (Peres da Silva et al. 2024)

dna-pathogen-20261012-metagenn-protocol-isolates

Aggregation: Not reported

MetageNN: a memory-efficient neural network taxonomic classifier robust to sequencing errors and missing genomes · Results 'Results for “Species out of the database” settings' paragraph 3, last sentences (values shown in Fig. 3f)
Configuration: MetageNN (main database, Peres da Silva et al. 2024)Protocol: Genus-level read classification of ONT bacterial isolates, main database (Peres da Silva et al. 2024)
Dataset: ONT reads from 81 bacterial isolates (Peres da Silva et al. 2024)
0.87 Recall (genus level; mean across the out-of-database isolates whose genus has more than three species)
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 shows standard-deviation error bars; no value is printed in the text

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MetageNN on genus-level read classification of ONT bacterial isolates, main database (Peres da Silva et al. 2024)

dna-pathogen-20261012-metagenn-protocol-isolates

Aggregation: Not reported

MetageNN: a memory-efficient neural network taxonomic classifier robust to sequencing errors and missing genomes · Results 'Results for “Species out of the database” settings' paragraph 3, last sentences (values shown in Fig. 3f)
Configuration: MMseqs2 (main database, Peres da Silva et al. 2024)Protocol: Genus-level read classification of ONT bacterial isolates, main database (Peres da Silva et al. 2024)
Dataset: ONT reads from 81 bacterial isolates (Peres da Silva et al. 2024)
0.85 F1 (genus level; mean across all 81 isolates (species in and out of the database))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 shows standard-deviation error bars; no value is printed in the text

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MMseqs2 on genus-level read classification of ONT bacterial isolates, main database (Peres da Silva et al. 2024)

dna-pathogen-20261012-metagenn-protocol-isolates

Aggregation: Not reported

MetageNN: a memory-efficient neural network taxonomic classifier robust to sequencing errors and missing genomes · Results 'Results for all genomes' paragraph 1, sentence 4 (values shown in Fig. 3a)
Configuration: MMseqs2 (main database, Peres da Silva et al. 2024)Protocol: Genus-level read classification of ONT bacterial isolates, main database (Peres da Silva et al. 2024)
Dataset: ONT reads from 81 bacterial isolates (Peres da Silva et al. 2024)
0.81 Recall (genus level; mean across all 81 isolates (species in and out of the database))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 shows standard-deviation error bars; no value is printed in the text

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

MMseqs2 on genus-level read classification of ONT bacterial isolates, main database (Peres da Silva et al. 2024)

dna-pathogen-20261012-metagenn-protocol-isolates

Aggregation: Not reported

MetageNN: a memory-efficient neural network taxonomic classifier robust to sequencing errors and missing genomes · Results 'Results for all genomes' paragraph 1, sentence 4 (values shown in Fig. 3a)

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Baseline coverage

Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.

0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.

No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.

Author-reported evaluations
3

Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.

Null control

Proposed control: requires review

Training-set class prior where supervised fitting is permitted

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Conventional reference

Proposed control: requires review

Regularised classifier on simple permitted features, or protocol's conventional reference

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Protocol coverage CSV (gzip) · Model evaluation matrix (gzip) · Source table (gzip) · Release and checksums (gzip)

Coverage is derived from release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: dna-pathogen-20261012-metagenn-protocol-isolates

areas
microbes-communities
contexts
research
protocol
Per-isolate sensitivity, precision and F1 of read assignments at genus level, averaged across isolates; reported for all isolates, species in the database and species out of the database, and by number of species per genus.
version
BMC Bioinformatics 2024
metric definition
For each taxon, sensitivity is the proportion of its reads classified as such and precision the proportion of correctly classified reads; F1 is their harmonic mean. Averages are across bacterial isolates; Wilcoxon rank-sum tests compare MetageNN with each tool.
source locator
Results 'Evaluation metrics'; 'Results for all genomes'; 'Results for “Species out of the database” settings'
limitations
Most per-tool values are only in Figure 3; the text prints a few averages.
review
method: source-hash-verification; scope-review; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Separate Claude review agent (rev-mlvb), independent of the extracting agent; no human review claimed; date: 2026-10-12; artifact sha256: ac4b137508d295d5e04e9be263bef40bdcf2c494e096407e5896611194f14e12; retrieval url: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11022314/fullTextXML; note: Checked against the re-downloaded article XML (SHA-256 matches).
Related records

Suggest a correction