Protocol

Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4)

Presence or absence of each mock community species from the method's species-level read counts.

Overview

Presence or absence of each mock community species from the method's species-level read counts.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

7 recorded evaluations, 56 metric rows. A comparison chart has not yet been validated for these results. The table retains the individual findings and their sources.

View coverage and remaining gaps across all benchmarks

Results

Results are available, but no reviewed comparison panel is linked in this release.

All evaluations

7 evaluations · 56 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Tested model or methodProtocolDatasetEvaluation setupMetricEvidence origin

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-09-8cc1db47c7f9.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Baseline coverage

Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.

0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.

No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.

Author-reported evaluations: 2
External evaluations: 5

Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.

Null control

Proposed control: requires review

Select a task-valid null control after reviewing inputs and metric

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Conventional reference

Proposed control: requires review

Select an upstream conventional reference after reviewing the full protocol

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Protocol coverage CSV (gzip) · Model evaluation matrix (gzip) · Source table (gzip) · Release and checksums (gzip)

Coverage is derived from release 2026-10-09-8cc1db47c7f9. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-09-8cc1db47c7f9
Property and statement	Original source and location	Review and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

All evidence (JSONL) (gzip)How to read the evidence

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-09-8cc1db47c7f9 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release history

Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Original source · BMC Bioinformatics 23:541, published 2022-12-13; PMC9749362 full-text XML

Download this release (gzip)

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species

areas: microbes-communities
contexts: clinical_research
protocol: A species is detected when its cumulative read count exceeds 0.001% of total reads (100 reads for this dataset). True positive: a mock community species detected; false positive: a detected species not in the community; false negative: a community species not detected. Precision, recall, F1 and F0.5 from these counts. L1: sum of absolute differences between estimated and theoretical species percent abundances, with all false positives pooled as 'Other' against a theoretical 0.
version: Table 4 block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)'
source locator: Methods 'Detection metrics' paragraphs 1-4; 'Relative abundance estimates' paragraph 4; Table 3 (threshold read counts)
limitations: Mock community of cultured organisms; no human host DNA, no clinical specimen matrix.; Detection threshold is a fixed fraction of total reads, which penalises methods that assign fewer reads (Methods 'Detection metrics' paragraph 1).; Each method used its own reference database.
missing metadata: uncertainty: reason: unreported; note: Single run per dataset; no intervals printed

Related records

uses data: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500)
part of: Mock community taxonomic profiling benchmark (Portik et al. 2022)
assessment: Bracken on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500)
assessment: Centrifuge-h22 on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500)
assessment: Kraken2 on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500)
assessment: MetaPhlAn3 on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500)
assessment: mOTUs on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500)
assessment: Sourmash-k31 on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500)
assessment: Sourmash-k51 on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500)
assessed by: Select a DNA pathogen-identification workflow for diagnostic testing

Suggest a correction