Public mock community sequencing run as used in Portik et al. 2022.
These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation. A source-checked score alone does not meet these requirements.
Release 2026-10-09-8cc1db47c7f9 · Evidence verified: Not verified
Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.
No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.
7 evaluations · 56 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: Bracken (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 0.18 f-beta-score fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBracken on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'Bracken' (table row 17), column 'F0.5' |
| Configuration: Bracken (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 0.26 f1-score fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBracken on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'Bracken' (table row 17), column 'F1' |
| Configuration: Bracken (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 0 false-negative-count count · lower Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBracken on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'Bracken' (table row 17), column 'False negatives' |
| Configuration: Bracken (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 113 false-positive-count count · lower Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBracken on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'Bracken' (table row 17), column 'False positives' |
| Configuration: Bracken (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 36.4% composition-l1-distance percent · lower Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBracken on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'Bracken' (table row 17), column 'L1' |
| Configuration: Bracken (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 0.15 precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBracken on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'Bracken' (table row 17), column 'Precision' |
| Configuration: Bracken (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 1 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBracken on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'Bracken' (table row 17), column 'Recall' |
| Configuration: Bracken (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 20 true-positive-count count · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBracken on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'Bracken' (table row 17), column 'True positives' |
| Configuration: Centrifuge-h22 (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 0.31 f-beta-score fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCentrifuge-h22 on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'Centrifuge-h22' (table row 18), column 'F0.5' |
| Configuration: Centrifuge-h22 (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 0.41 f1-score fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCentrifuge-h22 on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'Centrifuge-h22' (table row 18), column 'F1' |
| Configuration: Centrifuge-h22 (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 0 false-negative-count count · lower Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCentrifuge-h22 on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'Centrifuge-h22' (table row 18), column 'False negatives' |
| Configuration: Centrifuge-h22 (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 57 false-positive-count count · lower Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCentrifuge-h22 on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'Centrifuge-h22' (table row 18), column 'False positives' |
| Configuration: Centrifuge-h22 (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 54.2% composition-l1-distance percent · lower Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCentrifuge-h22 on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'Centrifuge-h22' (table row 18), column 'L1' |
| Configuration: Centrifuge-h22 (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 0.26 precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCentrifuge-h22 on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'Centrifuge-h22' (table row 18), column 'Precision' |
| Configuration: Centrifuge-h22 (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 1 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCentrifuge-h22 on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'Centrifuge-h22' (table row 18), column 'Recall' |
| Configuration: Centrifuge-h22 (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 20 true-positive-count count · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCentrifuge-h22 on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'Centrifuge-h22' (table row 18), column 'True positives' |
| Configuration: Kraken2 (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 0.24 f-beta-score fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceKraken2 on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'Kraken2' (table row 16), column 'F0.5' |
| Configuration: Kraken2 (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 0.34 f1-score fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceKraken2 on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'Kraken2' (table row 16), column 'F1' |
| Configuration: Kraken2 (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 0 false-negative-count count · lower Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceKraken2 on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'Kraken2' (table row 16), column 'False negatives' |
| Configuration: Kraken2 (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 77 false-positive-count count · lower Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceKraken2 on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'Kraken2' (table row 16), column 'False positives' |
| Configuration: Kraken2 (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 44.8% composition-l1-distance percent · lower Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceKraken2 on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'Kraken2' (table row 16), column 'L1' |
| Configuration: Kraken2 (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 0.21 precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceKraken2 on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'Kraken2' (table row 16), column 'Precision' |
| Configuration: Kraken2 (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 1 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceKraken2 on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'Kraken2' (table row 16), column 'Recall' |
| Configuration: Kraken2 (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 20 true-positive-count count · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceKraken2 on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'Kraken2' (table row 16), column 'True positives' |
| Configuration: MetaPhlAn3 (Portik et al. 2022) | Protocol: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500): species detection at 0.001% of total reads (Portik et al. 2022 Table 4) Dataset: Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) | 0.83 f-beta-score fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceMetaPhlAn3 on Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) dna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003-species Aggregation: Not reported Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · Table 4, dataset block 'Illumina ATCC MSA1003 (20 species, staggered)', row 'MetaPhlAn3' (table row 19), column 'F0.5' |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-09-8cc1db47c7f9.
A dataset supplies biological observations. The evaluation protocol defines how those observations are split, used and scored.
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
8 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| attributes.accession NCBI SRX5169925 Context-only references | Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets Table 1 row 'Illumina ATCC MSA-1003'; Methods 'Mock community datasets' paragraph 4 Version: BMC Bioinformatics 23:541, published 2022-12-13; PMC9749362 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.population ATCC MSA-1003: 20 bacterial species, staggered abundances. 10,038,314 reads of 125 bp (pre-trimmed from 150 bp paired-end), 1.25 Gb. Context-only references | Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets Table 1 row 'Illumina ATCC MSA-1003'; Methods 'Mock community datasets' paragraph 4 Version: BMC Bioinformatics 23:541, published 2022-12-13; PMC9749362 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.scope_note Species metrics are scored against 20 species. Context-only references | Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets Table 1 row 'Illumina ATCC MSA-1003'; Methods 'Mock community datasets' paragraph 4 Version: BMC Bioinformatics 23:541, published 2022-12-13; PMC9749362 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.source_locator Table 1 row 'Illumina ATCC MSA-1003'; Methods 'Mock community datasets' paragraph 4 Context-only references | Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets Table 1 row 'Illumina ATCC MSA-1003'; Methods 'Mock community datasets' paragraph 4 Version: BMC Bioinformatics 23:541, published 2022-12-13; PMC9749362 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.split Single sequencing run of one mock community; no split Context-only references | Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets Table 1 row 'Illumina ATCC MSA-1003'; Methods 'Mock community datasets' paragraph 4 Version: BMC Bioinformatics 23:541, published 2022-12-13; PMC9749362 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.version As described in Portik et al. 2022 Table 1 (NCBI SRX5169925) Context-only references | Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets Table 1 row 'Illumina ATCC MSA-1003'; Methods 'Mock community datasets' paragraph 4 Version: BMC Bioinformatics 23:541, published 2022-12-13; PMC9749362 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| description Public mock community sequencing run as used in Portik et al. 2022. Context-only references | Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets Table 1 row 'Illumina ATCC MSA-1003'; Methods 'Mock community datasets' paragraph 4 Version: BMC Bioinformatics 23:541, published 2022-12-13; PMC9749362 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| name Illumina ATCC MSA-1003 mock community (HiSeq 2500) Context-only references | Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets Table 1 row 'Illumina ATCC MSA-1003'; Methods 'Mock community datasets' paragraph 4 Version: BMC Bioinformatics 23:541, published 2022-12-13; PMC9749362 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
Release 2026-10-09-8cc1db47c7f9 · Record review: source checked
Stable ID: dna-pathogen-20261009-data-portik2022-illumina-atcc-msa1003