rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Protocol

Feng Promoter Arabidopsis TATA sequence classification

Table 2 sequence classification; Feng et al. 2025 source-reported protocol.

5 evaluations · 5 results

Overview

Table 2 sequence classification; Feng et al. 2025 source-reported protocol.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

5 recorded evaluations, 5 metric rows. A comparison chart has not yet been validated for these results. The table retains the individual findings and their sources.

View coverage and remaining gaps across all benchmarks

Results

Results are available, but no reviewed comparison panel is linked in this release.

All evaluations

5 evaluations · 5 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: Caduceus-Ph (Promoter Arabidopsis TATA classification)Protocol: Feng Promoter Arabidopsis TATA sequence classification
Dataset: Feng Promoter Arabidopsis TATA dataset
0.937 Promoter Arabidopsis TATA AUC
AUC · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Caduceus-Ph Promoter Arabidopsis TATA evaluation

Table 2, frozen embeddings + task-specific random forest classifier

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking DNA foundation models for genomic and genetic tasks · Table 2, Promoter Arabidopsis TATA row, Caduceus-Ph column (deterministic XML extraction; see data/omics/amp-coverage-20261007/feng/selected-rows.json)
Configuration: DNABERT-2 (Promoter Arabidopsis TATA classification)Protocol: Feng Promoter Arabidopsis TATA sequence classification
Dataset: Feng Promoter Arabidopsis TATA dataset
0.951 Promoter Arabidopsis TATA AUC
AUC · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DNABERT-2 Promoter Arabidopsis TATA evaluation

Table 2, frozen embeddings + task-specific random forest classifier

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking DNA foundation models for genomic and genetic tasks · Table 2, Promoter Arabidopsis TATA row, DNABERT-2 column (deterministic XML extraction; see data/omics/amp-coverage-20261007/feng/selected-rows.json)
Configuration: GROVER (Promoter Arabidopsis TATA classification)Protocol: Feng Promoter Arabidopsis TATA sequence classification
Dataset: Feng Promoter Arabidopsis TATA dataset
0.949 Promoter Arabidopsis TATA AUC
AUC · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

GROVER Promoter Arabidopsis TATA evaluation

Table 2, frozen embeddings + task-specific random forest classifier

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking DNA foundation models for genomic and genetic tasks · Table 2, Promoter Arabidopsis TATA row, GROVER column (deterministic XML extraction; see data/omics/amp-coverage-20261007/feng/selected-rows.json)
Configuration: HyenaDNA (Promoter Arabidopsis TATA classification)Protocol: Feng Promoter Arabidopsis TATA sequence classification
Dataset: Feng Promoter Arabidopsis TATA dataset
0.961 Promoter Arabidopsis TATA AUC
AUC · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

HyenaDNA Promoter Arabidopsis TATA evaluation

Table 2, frozen embeddings + task-specific random forest classifier

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking DNA foundation models for genomic and genetic tasks · Table 2, Promoter Arabidopsis TATA row, HyenaDNA column (deterministic XML extraction; see data/omics/amp-coverage-20261007/feng/selected-rows.json)
Configuration: NT-v2 (Promoter Arabidopsis TATA classification)Protocol: Feng Promoter Arabidopsis TATA sequence classification
Dataset: Feng Promoter Arabidopsis TATA dataset
0.95 Promoter Arabidopsis TATA AUC
AUC · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

NT-v2 Promoter Arabidopsis TATA evaluation

Table 2, frozen embeddings + task-specific random forest classifier

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking DNA foundation models for genomic and genetic tasks · Table 2, Promoter Arabidopsis TATA row, NT-v2 column (deterministic XML extraction; see data/omics/amp-coverage-20261007/feng/selected-rows.json)

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-07-1448159e6a81.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Baseline coverage

Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.

0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.

No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.

External evaluations
5

Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.

Null control

Proposed control: requires review

Training-set class prior where supervised fitting is permitted

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Conventional reference

Proposed control: requires review

Regularised classifier on simple permitted features, or protocol's conventional reference

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Protocol coverage CSV · Model evaluation matrix · Source table · Release and checksums

Coverage is derived from release 2026-10-07-1448159e6a81. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-07-1448159e6a81
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-10-07-1448159e6a81 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: amp-feng-20261007-protocol-promoter-tata

areas
dna-genomes
missing metadata
None recorded
scope note
Frozen last-layer mean token embeddings from each pretrained model, scored by a supervised random forest classifier fitted for this exact task (not label-free prediction). Original predefined split retained where clearly defined; otherwise a random 70:30 train/test split, tuned by fivefold cross-validation. This ref34 multispecies promoter benchmark's own partitioning is not asserted to follow the DNABERT-2/NT reshuffle rule absent explicit confirmation. Exact per-task split sizes/counts (identified in Supplementary Data 6, not inspected by this intake) and immutable checkpoint/head revisions are unextracted from the inspected main text; not asserted absent from the article.
task
Promoter Arabidopsis TATA sequence classification (AUC)
version
Table 2
Related records

Suggest a correction