rewire.itbenchmarks
Model

FramePool

Named prediction model family identified in the cited primary source. Exact fitted configurations and scores are separate records.

12 evaluations · 12 results

Overview

Named prediction model family identified in the cited primary source. Exact fitted configurations and scores are separate records.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

12 evaluations · 12 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: FramePool 100Protocol: FramePool study MRL: Human 25-100nt
Dataset subset: Sample MPRA Human 25-100nt
0.884 pearson_r
correlation · higher

Uncertainty: type: unreported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FramePool 100 Human 25-100nt

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

FramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell E5; row Human 25-100nt, column FramePool 100; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation
Configuration: FramePool 50Protocol: FramePool study MRL: Human 25-100nt
Dataset subset: Sample MPRA Human 25-100nt
0.871 pearson_r
correlation · higher

Uncertainty: type: unreported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FramePool 50 Human 25-100nt

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

FramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell C5; row Human 25-100nt, column FramePool 50; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation
Configuration: FramePool CombinedProtocol: FramePool study MRL: Human 25-100nt
Dataset subset: Sample MPRA Human 25-100nt
0.894 pearson_r
correlation · higher

Uncertainty: type: unreported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FramePool Combined Human 25-100nt

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

FramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell F5; row Human 25-100nt, column FramePool Combined; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation
Configuration: FramePool 100Protocol: FramePool study MRL: Human 50nt
Dataset subset: Sample MPRA Human 50nt
0.839 pearson_r
correlation · higher

Uncertainty: type: unreported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FramePool 100 Human 50nt

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

FramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell E4; row Human 50nt, column FramePool 100; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation
Configuration: FramePool 50Protocol: FramePool study MRL: Human 50nt
Dataset subset: Sample MPRA Human 50nt
0.882 pearson_r
correlation · higher

Uncertainty: type: unreported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FramePool 50 Human 50nt

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

FramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell C4; row Human 50nt, column FramePool 50; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation
Configuration: FramePool CombinedProtocol: FramePool study MRL: Human 50nt
Dataset subset: Sample MPRA Human 50nt
0.867 pearson_r
correlation · higher

Uncertainty: type: unreported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FramePool Combined Human 50nt

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

FramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell F4; row Human 50nt, column FramePool Combined; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation
Configuration: FramePool 100Protocol: FramePool study MRL: Random 25-100nt
Dataset subset: Sample MPRA Random 25-100nt
0.903 pearson_r
correlation · higher

Uncertainty: type: unreported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FramePool 100 Random 25-100nt

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

FramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell E3; row Random 25-100nt, column FramePool 100; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation
Configuration: FramePool 50Protocol: FramePool study MRL: Random 25-100nt
Dataset subset: Sample MPRA Random 25-100nt
0.901 pearson_r
correlation · higher

Uncertainty: type: unreported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FramePool 50 Random 25-100nt

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

FramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell C3; row Random 25-100nt, column FramePool 50; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation
Configuration: FramePool CombinedProtocol: FramePool study MRL: Random 25-100nt
Dataset subset: Sample MPRA Random 25-100nt
0.914 pearson_r
correlation · higher

Uncertainty: type: unreported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FramePool Combined Random 25-100nt

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

FramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell F3; row Random 25-100nt, column FramePool Combined; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation
Configuration: FramePool 100Protocol: FramePool study MRL: Random 50nt
Dataset subset: Sample MPRA Random 50nt
0.929 pearson_r
correlation · higher

Uncertainty: type: unreported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FramePool 100 Random 50nt

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

FramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell E2; row Random 50nt, column FramePool 100; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation
Configuration: FramePool 50Protocol: FramePool study MRL: Random 50nt
Dataset subset: Sample MPRA Random 50nt
0.964 pearson_r
correlation · higher

Uncertainty: type: unreported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FramePool 50 Random 50nt

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

FramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell C2; row Random 50nt, column FramePool 50; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation
Configuration: FramePool CombinedProtocol: FramePool study MRL: Random 50nt
Dataset subset: Sample MPRA Random 50nt
0.954 pearson_r
correlation · higher

Uncertainty: type: unreported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FramePool Combined Random 50nt

Not reported

Aggregation: Not reported

FramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell F2; row Random 50nt, column FramePool Combined; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d.

Use this model

How it works, versions and access

Versions and evaluated configurations

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d · Record review: source checked

2 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: uc20260930-model-framepool

areas
rna-transcriptomes
source locator
S1/S4 Table; Methods Framepool model and Model training; S7–S8 figure captions
review
method: automated_source_review; reviewer: Codex experimental-use-case curation; date: 2026-09-30; reviewed at: 2026-09-30T21:40:59.576893+00:00; scope: Primary-source transcription and catalogue applicability audit; not human scientific review or independent experimental reproduction.
entity level
family
identity scope
Family/method identity only; no undocumented checkpoint equivalence.
Related records

Suggest a correction