rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Evaluation

BindCraft binding screen against Bet v1

Developer-reported outcome transcribed from the pinned source; not reproduced.

Evaluation results

1 evaluation · 1 result. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: BindCraft default settingsProtocol: BindCraft per-target binding screen, hit where a binding signal was observed
Dataset: BindCraft binder design target Bet v1
two successful designs Count (designs with an observed binding signal (SPR), out of designs tested)
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not applicable: An exact count.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BindCraft binding screen against Bet v1

uc-binder-20261022-protocol-bindcraft-binding-screen

Aggregation: Not reported

One-shot design of functional protein binders with BindCraft (Pacesa et al., Nature 2025) · Results 'Masking allergenic epitopes', paragraph 5: 'we identified two successful designs from seven tested binders against the birch allergen Bet v1 (Fig. 1b)'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.

Research readiness

0 of 4 readiness checks met. These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation; a source-checked score alone does not meet them.

Readiness checks, gaps and artifacts

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Evidence verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Replay metrics

Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • Metrics are recomputed from the saved predictions: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Investigate discrepancies

Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • Metrics are recomputed from the saved predictions: not yet verified
  • Sample annotations are recorded: not yet verified
  • Dependence between samples is assessed: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Run locally

A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • A pinned run recipe exists: not yet verified
  • Compute requirements are estimated: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Validate independently

Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • Independent validation data exist: not yet verified
  • Overlap with training data is checked: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.

Artifacts and reproduction

No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.

Evaluation procedure

BindCraft per-target binding screen, hit where a binding signal was observed

Configuration
BindCraft default settings
Protocol
BindCraft per-target binding screen, hit where a binding signal was observed
Dataset
BindCraft binder design target Bet v1
origin
Author-reported evaluation
configuration
Nature 2025 version of record
adaptation
Not reported
aggregation
Count per target
budget
7 designs expressed, purified and assayed
dataset version
Bet v1, Supplementary Table 1 input
inputs
Target structure and hotspot residues from Supplementary Table 1
metric implementation
Count of tested designs with an observed binding signal (SPR)
population
7 BindCraft designs tested against Bet v1
protocol id
uc-binder-20261022-protocol-bindcraft-binding-screen
split
Not reported

Metadata review: source checked. Unreported conditions prevent automatic comparisons.

Reproduction

Split
Not reported
Adaptation
Not reported
Scoring implementation
Count of tested designs with an observed binding signal (SPR)

No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.

Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

22 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Candidate selection
About 10 designs from the top 20 ranked by the pipeline's own i_pTM score.
Context-only references
One-shot design of functional protein binders with BindCraft (Pacesa et al., Nature 2025)

Original source ↗

Results 'Masking allergenic epitopes', paragraph 5: 'we identified two successful designs from seven tested binders against the birch allergen Bet v1 (Fig. 1b)'

Version: Nature, version of record; Europe PMC JATS full text for PMC12507698
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:55:00Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim.

Audit details

Field: attributes.candidate_selection

Source artifact SHA-256: 74bd2902d46460ec387ed6ee46b5bf8fe61b9ea09f2d7be4daa2046ac7e59d5d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: adaptation
Not reported
Context-only references
One-shot design of functional protein binders with BindCraft (Pacesa et al., Nature 2025)

Original source ↗

Results 'Masking allergenic epitopes', paragraph 5: 'we identified two successful designs from seven tested binders against the birch allergen Bet v1 (Fig. 1b)'

Version: Nature, version of record; Europe PMC JATS full text for PMC12507698
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:55:00Z

missing or unspecified

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim.

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.adaptation

Source artifact SHA-256: 74bd2902d46460ec387ed6ee46b5bf8fe61b9ea09f2d7be4daa2046ac7e59d5d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: aggregation
Count per target
Context-only references
One-shot design of functional protein binders with BindCraft (Pacesa et al., Nature 2025)

Original source ↗

Results 'Masking allergenic epitopes', paragraph 5: 'we identified two successful designs from seven tested binders against the birch allergen Bet v1 (Fig. 1b)'

Version: Nature, version of record; Europe PMC JATS full text for PMC12507698
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:55:00Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim.

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.aggregation

Source artifact SHA-256: 74bd2902d46460ec387ed6ee46b5bf8fe61b9ea09f2d7be4daa2046ac7e59d5d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: budget
7 designs expressed, purified and assayed
Context-only references
One-shot design of functional protein binders with BindCraft (Pacesa et al., Nature 2025)

Original source ↗

Results 'Masking allergenic epitopes', paragraph 5: 'we identified two successful designs from seven tested binders against the birch allergen Bet v1 (Fig. 1b)'

Version: Nature, version of record; Europe PMC JATS full text for PMC12507698
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:55:00Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim.

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.budget

Source artifact SHA-256: 74bd2902d46460ec387ed6ee46b5bf8fe61b9ea09f2d7be4daa2046ac7e59d5d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: dataset version
Bet v1, Supplementary Table 1 input
Context-only references
One-shot design of functional protein binders with BindCraft (Pacesa et al., Nature 2025)

Original source ↗

Results 'Masking allergenic epitopes', paragraph 5: 'we identified two successful designs from seven tested binders against the birch allergen Bet v1 (Fig. 1b)'

Version: Nature, version of record; Europe PMC JATS full text for PMC12507698
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:55:00Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim.

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.dataset_version

Source artifact SHA-256: 74bd2902d46460ec387ed6ee46b5bf8fe61b9ea09f2d7be4daa2046ac7e59d5d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: inputs
Target structure and hotspot residues from Supplementary Table 1
Context-only references
One-shot design of functional protein binders with BindCraft (Pacesa et al., Nature 2025)

Original source ↗

Results 'Masking allergenic epitopes', paragraph 5: 'we identified two successful designs from seven tested binders against the birch allergen Bet v1 (Fig. 1b)'

Version: Nature, version of record; Europe PMC JATS full text for PMC12507698
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:55:00Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim.

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.inputs

Source artifact SHA-256: 74bd2902d46460ec387ed6ee46b5bf8fe61b9ea09f2d7be4daa2046ac7e59d5d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: metric implementation
Count of tested designs with an observed binding signal (SPR)
Context-only references
One-shot design of functional protein binders with BindCraft (Pacesa et al., Nature 2025)

Original source ↗

Results 'Masking allergenic epitopes', paragraph 5: 'we identified two successful designs from seven tested binders against the birch allergen Bet v1 (Fig. 1b)'

Version: Nature, version of record; Europe PMC JATS full text for PMC12507698
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:55:00Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim.

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.metric_implementation

Source artifact SHA-256: 74bd2902d46460ec387ed6ee46b5bf8fe61b9ea09f2d7be4daa2046ac7e59d5d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: population
7 BindCraft designs tested against Bet v1
Context-only references
One-shot design of functional protein binders with BindCraft (Pacesa et al., Nature 2025)

Original source ↗

Results 'Masking allergenic epitopes', paragraph 5: 'we identified two successful designs from seven tested binders against the birch allergen Bet v1 (Fig. 1b)'

Version: Nature, version of record; Europe PMC JATS full text for PMC12507698
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:55:00Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim.

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.population

Source artifact SHA-256: 74bd2902d46460ec387ed6ee46b5bf8fe61b9ea09f2d7be4daa2046ac7e59d5d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: protocol id
uc-binder-20261022-protocol-bindcraft-binding-screen
Context-only references
One-shot design of functional protein binders with BindCraft (Pacesa et al., Nature 2025)

Original source ↗

Results 'Masking allergenic epitopes', paragraph 5: 'we identified two successful designs from seven tested binders against the birch allergen Bet v1 (Fig. 1b)'

Version: Nature, version of record; Europe PMC JATS full text for PMC12507698
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:55:00Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim.

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.protocol_id

Source artifact SHA-256: 74bd2902d46460ec387ed6ee46b5bf8fe61b9ea09f2d7be4daa2046ac7e59d5d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Comparison: split
Not reported
Context-only references
One-shot design of functional protein binders with BindCraft (Pacesa et al., Nature 2025)

Original source ↗

Results 'Masking allergenic epitopes', paragraph 5: 'we identified two successful designs from seven tested binders against the birch allergen Bet v1 (Fig. 1b)'

Version: Nature, version of record; Europe PMC JATS full text for PMC12507698
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:55:00Z

missing or unspecified

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim.

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.split

Source artifact SHA-256: 74bd2902d46460ec387ed6ee46b5bf8fe61b9ea09f2d7be4daa2046ac7e59d5d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

How to read the evidence

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: uc-binder-20261022-eval-bindcraft-screen-betv1

areas
proteins-complexes; protein-structure
contexts
research
candidate selection
About 10 designs from the top 20 ranked by the pipeline's own i_pTM score.
comparison
adaptation: Not reported; aggregation: Count per target; budget: 7 designs expressed, purified and assayed; dataset version: Bet v1, Supplementary Table 1 input; inputs: Target structure and hotspot residues from Supplementary Table 1; metric implementation: Count of tested designs with an observed binding signal (SPR); population: 7 BindCraft designs tested against Bet v1; protocol id: uc-binder-20261022-protocol-bindcraft-binding-screen; split: Not reported
conventional baseline
None run on this target.
denominator
7
endpoint
Binding signal observed by SPR
missing metadata
comparison.adaptation: note: No adaptation step.; reason: inapplicable; comparison.split: note: A design campaign, not a train/test split.; reason: inapplicable
origin
author_reported
protocol
uc-binder-20261022-protocol-bindcraft-binding-screen
review
artifact sha256: 74bd2902d46460ec387ed6ee46b5bf8fe61b9ea09f2d7be4daa2046ac7e59d5d; method: source-hash-verification; independent-cell-check; ai-assisted-source-review; method note: Re-downloaded from Europe PMC (HTTP 200, 226,059 bytes) and the SHA-256 recomputed and matched. Own flattening of the JATS XML; every quoted locator sentence and every printed value checked verbatim against it by a parser written for this review.; note: Reviewed in docs/reviews/use-cases/binder-2026-10-22.md. Automated AI review of the source transcription only; it is not human scientific review and nothing here was reproduced experimentally.; retrieval url: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12507698/fullTextXML; reviewed at: 2026-10-22T15:00:00Z; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Claude review agent, independent of the extraction agent; no human review claimed
source locator
Results 'Masking allergenic epitopes', paragraph 5: 'we identified two successful designs from seven tested binders against the birch allergen Bet v1 (Fig. 1b)'
version
Nature 2025 version of record
Related records

Suggest a correction