rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Evaluation

BindCraft with helical loss -2.0 in Adaptyv round 2: Adaptyv EGFR competition cell-free expression rate

Third-party measurement of entrant designs, transcribed from the pinned source; not reproduced.

Evaluation results

1 evaluation · 1 result. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: BindCraft with helical loss -2.0 as entered in Adaptyv round 2Protocol: Adaptyv EGFR competition cell-free expression rate
Dataset: Adaptyv EGFR competition round 2 tested designs
all ten showed high expression rates Count (designs with high expression)
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not applicable: An exact count.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BindCraft with helical loss -2.0 in Adaptyv round 2: Adaptyv EGFR competition cell-free expression rate

uc-binder-20261022-protocol-adaptyv-expression

Aggregation: Not reported

Crowdsourced Protein Design: Lessons From the Adaptyv EGFR Binder Competition (Cotet et al., bioRxiv 2025) · Section 3.1: 'Ten out of the author's submitted beta sheeted designs were tested and - given the lower overall expression rate of the competition in R1 - surprisingly all ten showed high expression rates'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.

Research readiness

0 of 4 readiness checks met. These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation; a source-checked score alone does not meet them.

Readiness checks, gaps and artifacts

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Evidence verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Replay metrics

Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • Metrics are recomputed from the saved predictions: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Investigate discrepancies

Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • Metrics are recomputed from the saved predictions: not yet verified
  • Sample annotations are recorded: not yet verified
  • Dependence between samples is assessed: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Run locally

A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • A pinned run recipe exists: not yet verified
  • Compute requirements are estimated: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Validate independently

Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • Independent validation data exist: not yet verified
  • Overlap with training data is checked: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.

Artifacts and reproduction

No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.

Evaluation procedure

Adaptyv EGFR competition cell-free expression rate

Configuration
BindCraft with helical loss -2.0 as entered in Adaptyv round 2
Protocol
Adaptyv EGFR competition cell-free expression rate
Dataset
Adaptyv EGFR competition round 2 tested designs
origin
Independent external evaluation
configuration
bioRxiv v1
adaptation
Not reported
aggregation
Over the designs tested in the stated round
budget
10 designs tested
dataset version
Adaptyv EGFR Binder Design Competition round 2, results revealed December 2024
inputs
EGFR structure; entrants chose their own inputs and workflow
metric implementation
designs with high expression
population
10 designs tested
protocol id
uc-binder-20261022-protocol-adaptyv-expression
split
Not reported

Metadata review: source checked. Unreported conditions prevent automatic comparisons.

Reproduction

Split
Not reported
Adaptation
Not reported
Scoring implementation
designs with high expression

No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.

Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

19 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Comparison: adaptation
Not reported
Context-only references
Crowdsourced Protein Design: Lessons From the Adaptyv EGFR Binder Competition (Cotet et al., bioRxiv 2025)

Original source ↗

Section 3.1: 'Ten out of the author's submitted beta sheeted designs were tested and - given the lower overall expression rate of the competition in R1 - surprisingly all ten showed high expression rates'

Version: bioRxiv preprint version 1
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T12:01:00Z

missing or unspecified

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim.

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.adaptation

Source artifact SHA-256: 17039d69ecc37f45f6c402511b8f4497ce631003689fa95ad1ab221f8f787a4f

Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of a mutable web page. The hash describes that retrieval, not a stable artifact.

Inspected artifact

Comparison: aggregation
Over the designs tested in the stated round
Context-only references
Crowdsourced Protein Design: Lessons From the Adaptyv EGFR Binder Competition (Cotet et al., bioRxiv 2025)

Original source ↗

Section 3.1: 'Ten out of the author's submitted beta sheeted designs were tested and - given the lower overall expression rate of the competition in R1 - surprisingly all ten showed high expression rates'

Version: bioRxiv preprint version 1
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T12:01:00Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim.

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.aggregation

Source artifact SHA-256: 17039d69ecc37f45f6c402511b8f4497ce631003689fa95ad1ab221f8f787a4f

Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of a mutable web page. The hash describes that retrieval, not a stable artifact.

Inspected artifact

Comparison: budget
10 designs tested
Context-only references
Crowdsourced Protein Design: Lessons From the Adaptyv EGFR Binder Competition (Cotet et al., bioRxiv 2025)

Original source ↗

Section 3.1: 'Ten out of the author's submitted beta sheeted designs were tested and - given the lower overall expression rate of the competition in R1 - surprisingly all ten showed high expression rates'

Version: bioRxiv preprint version 1
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T12:01:00Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim.

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.budget

Source artifact SHA-256: 17039d69ecc37f45f6c402511b8f4497ce631003689fa95ad1ab221f8f787a4f

Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of a mutable web page. The hash describes that retrieval, not a stable artifact.

Inspected artifact

Comparison: dataset version
Adaptyv EGFR Binder Design Competition round 2, results revealed December 2024
Context-only references
Crowdsourced Protein Design: Lessons From the Adaptyv EGFR Binder Competition (Cotet et al., bioRxiv 2025)

Original source ↗

Section 3.1: 'Ten out of the author's submitted beta sheeted designs were tested and - given the lower overall expression rate of the competition in R1 - surprisingly all ten showed high expression rates'

Version: bioRxiv preprint version 1
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T12:01:00Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim.

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.dataset_version

Source artifact SHA-256: 17039d69ecc37f45f6c402511b8f4497ce631003689fa95ad1ab221f8f787a4f

Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of a mutable web page. The hash describes that retrieval, not a stable artifact.

Inspected artifact

Comparison: inputs
EGFR structure; entrants chose their own inputs and workflow
Context-only references
Crowdsourced Protein Design: Lessons From the Adaptyv EGFR Binder Competition (Cotet et al., bioRxiv 2025)

Original source ↗

Section 3.1: 'Ten out of the author's submitted beta sheeted designs were tested and - given the lower overall expression rate of the competition in R1 - surprisingly all ten showed high expression rates'

Version: bioRxiv preprint version 1
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T12:01:00Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim.

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.inputs

Source artifact SHA-256: 17039d69ecc37f45f6c402511b8f4497ce631003689fa95ad1ab221f8f787a4f

Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of a mutable web page. The hash describes that retrieval, not a stable artifact.

Inspected artifact

Comparison: metric implementation
designs with high expression
Context-only references
Crowdsourced Protein Design: Lessons From the Adaptyv EGFR Binder Competition (Cotet et al., bioRxiv 2025)

Original source ↗

Section 3.1: 'Ten out of the author's submitted beta sheeted designs were tested and - given the lower overall expression rate of the competition in R1 - surprisingly all ten showed high expression rates'

Version: bioRxiv preprint version 1
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T12:01:00Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim.

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.metric_implementation

Source artifact SHA-256: 17039d69ecc37f45f6c402511b8f4497ce631003689fa95ad1ab221f8f787a4f

Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of a mutable web page. The hash describes that retrieval, not a stable artifact.

Inspected artifact

Comparison: population
10 designs tested
Context-only references
Crowdsourced Protein Design: Lessons From the Adaptyv EGFR Binder Competition (Cotet et al., bioRxiv 2025)

Original source ↗

Section 3.1: 'Ten out of the author's submitted beta sheeted designs were tested and - given the lower overall expression rate of the competition in R1 - surprisingly all ten showed high expression rates'

Version: bioRxiv preprint version 1
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T12:01:00Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim.

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.population

Source artifact SHA-256: 17039d69ecc37f45f6c402511b8f4497ce631003689fa95ad1ab221f8f787a4f

Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of a mutable web page. The hash describes that retrieval, not a stable artifact.

Inspected artifact

Comparison: protocol id
uc-binder-20261022-protocol-adaptyv-expression
Context-only references
Crowdsourced Protein Design: Lessons From the Adaptyv EGFR Binder Competition (Cotet et al., bioRxiv 2025)

Original source ↗

Section 3.1: 'Ten out of the author's submitted beta sheeted designs were tested and - given the lower overall expression rate of the competition in R1 - surprisingly all ten showed high expression rates'

Version: bioRxiv preprint version 1
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T12:01:00Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim.

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.protocol_id

Source artifact SHA-256: 17039d69ecc37f45f6c402511b8f4497ce631003689fa95ad1ab221f8f787a4f

Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of a mutable web page. The hash describes that retrieval, not a stable artifact.

Inspected artifact

Comparison: split
Not reported
Context-only references
Crowdsourced Protein Design: Lessons From the Adaptyv EGFR Binder Competition (Cotet et al., bioRxiv 2025)

Original source ↗

Section 3.1: 'Ten out of the author's submitted beta sheeted designs were tested and - given the lower overall expression rate of the competition in R1 - surprisingly all ten showed high expression rates'

Version: bioRxiv preprint version 1
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T12:01:00Z

missing or unspecified

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim.

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.split

Source artifact SHA-256: 17039d69ecc37f45f6c402511b8f4497ce631003689fa95ad1ab221f8f787a4f

Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of a mutable web page. The hash describes that retrieval, not a stable artifact.

Inspected artifact

Denominator
10
Context-only references
Crowdsourced Protein Design: Lessons From the Adaptyv EGFR Binder Competition (Cotet et al., bioRxiv 2025)

Original source ↗

Section 3.1: 'Ten out of the author's submitted beta sheeted designs were tested and - given the lower overall expression rate of the competition in R1 - surprisingly all ten showed high expression rates'

Version: bioRxiv preprint version 1
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T12:01:00Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

independent paper

Source has a recorded evidence concern. Consult its source page before using the claim.

Audit details

Field: attributes.denominator

Source artifact SHA-256: 17039d69ecc37f45f6c402511b8f4497ce631003689fa95ad1ab221f8f787a4f

Hash scope: SHA-256 of one retrieval of a mutable web page. The hash describes that retrieval, not a stable artifact.

Inspected artifact

How to read the evidence

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: uc-binder-20261022-eval-adaptyv-bindcraft-r2-expression

areas
proteins-complexes; protein-structure
contexts
research
comparison
adaptation: Not reported; aggregation: Over the designs tested in the stated round; budget: 10 designs tested; dataset version: Adaptyv EGFR Binder Design Competition round 2, results revealed December 2024; inputs: EGFR structure; entrants chose their own inputs and workflow; metric implementation: designs with high expression; population: 10 designs tested; protocol id: uc-binder-20261022-protocol-adaptyv-expression; split: Not reported
denominator
10
missing metadata
comparison.adaptation: note: No adaptation step; designs were submitted as they were generated.; reason: inapplicable; comparison.split: note: A design competition, not a train/test split.; reason: inapplicable
origin
independent_paper
protocol
uc-binder-20261022-protocol-adaptyv-expression
review
artifact sha256: 17039d69ecc37f45f6c402511b8f4497ce631003689fa95ad1ab221f8f787a4f; method: source-hash-verification; independent-cell-check; ai-assisted-source-review; method note: Re-downloaded (HTTP 200, 493,217 bytes, the same byte count as the pinned retrieval) but the SHA-256 differs, as expected for a mutable bioRxiv page whose hash describes one retrieval. Every extracted value and every quoted sentence was then located verbatim in the new retrieval, so the difference is in page furniture and not in the evidence. One section attribution and one quotation were corrected.; note: Reviewed in docs/reviews/use-cases/binder-2026-10-22.md. Automated AI review of the source transcription only; it is not human scientific review and nothing here was reproduced experimentally.; retrieval url: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.04.17.648362v1.full; reviewed at: 2026-10-22T15:00:00Z; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Claude review agent, independent of the extraction agent; no human review claimed
source locator
Section 3.1: 'Ten out of the author's submitted beta sheeted designs were tested and - given the lower overall expression rate of the competition in R1 - surprisingly all ten showed high expression rates'
version
bioRxiv v1
Related records

Suggest a correction