rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Evaluation

NAIAD with UCB acquisition on Norman (Tables 2 and 3, acquisition functions with NAIAD)

Published comparison; transcribed, not reproduced.

Evaluation results

1 evaluation · 2 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Protocol: Retrospective active learning on a fully measured two-gene CRISPR viability screen: top-200 gene pairs found by round 4 · Dataset: Norman et al. 2019 combinatorial CRISPRa in K562, gene-level viability (as processed by Qin et al. 2025)

Sorted by Count (marginal gain (P_4 - P_0)/4 in the screen's 200 strongest measured gene pairs found, round 0 to round 4) (higher is better). The best value in each column is highlighted. Decimals are rounded for display; each value links to the printed value and its source.

Tested configurationCount (marginal gain (P_4 - P_0)/4 in the screen's 200 strongest measured gene pairs found, round 0 to round 4)True positives (the screen's 200 strongest measured gene pairs found among the 200 strongest measured-plus-predicted values, round 4 of active learning)
NAIAD with UCB acquisitionEvaluation2.2597
All 2 result rows with coverage, uncertainty and sources
Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: NAIAD with UCB acquisitionProtocol: Retrospective active learning on a fully measured two-gene CRISPR viability screen: top-200 gene pairs found by round 4
Dataset: Norman et al. 2019 combinatorial CRISPRa in K562, gene-level viability (as processed by Qin et al. 2025)
2.25 Count (marginal gain (P_4 - P_0)/4 in the screen's 200 strongest measured gene pairs found, round 0 to round 4)
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The table prints no error and does not state the number of runs.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

NAIAD with UCB acquisition on Norman (Tables 2 and 3, acquisition functions with NAIAD)

pheno-20261022-qin2025-protocol-al-top200

Aggregation: Not reported

Qin et al. 2025, Active Learning for Efficient Discovery of Optimal Combinatorial Perturbations (ICML 2025, PMLR 267) · Table 3, row "UCB", column "Norman"
Configuration: NAIAD with UCB acquisitionProtocol: Retrospective active learning on a fully measured two-gene CRISPR viability screen: top-200 gene pairs found by round 4
Dataset: Norman et al. 2019 combinatorial CRISPRa in K562, gene-level viability (as processed by Qin et al. 2025)
97 True positives (the screen's 200 strongest measured gene pairs found among the 200 strongest measured-plus-predicted values, round 4 of active learning)
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The table prints no error and does not state the number of runs.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

NAIAD with UCB acquisition on Norman (Tables 2 and 3, acquisition functions with NAIAD)

pheno-20261022-qin2025-protocol-al-top200

Aggregation: Not reported

Qin et al. 2025, Active Learning for Efficient Discovery of Optimal Combinatorial Perturbations (ICML 2025, PMLR 267) · Table 2, row "UCB", column "Norman"

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-23-5347695500ed.

Research readiness

0 of 4 readiness checks met. These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation; a source-checked score alone does not meet them.

Readiness checks, gaps and artifacts

Release 2026-10-23-5347695500ed · Evidence verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Replay metrics

Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • Metrics are recomputed from the saved predictions: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Investigate discrepancies

Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • Metrics are recomputed from the saved predictions: not yet verified
  • Sample annotations are recorded: not yet verified
  • Dependence between samples is assessed: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Run locally

A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • A pinned run recipe exists: not yet verified
  • Compute requirements are estimated: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Validate independently

Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • Independent validation data exist: not yet verified
  • Overlap with training data is checked: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.

Artifacts and reproduction

No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.

Evaluation procedure

Retrospective active learning on a fully measured two-gene CRISPR viability screen: top-200 gene pairs found by round 4

Configuration
NAIAD with UCB acquisition
Protocol
Retrospective active learning on a fully measured two-gene CRISPR viability screen: top-200 gene pairs found by round 4
Dataset
Norman et al. 2019 combinatorial CRISPRa in K562, gene-level viability (as processed by Qin et al. 2025)
origin
Author-reported evaluation
configuration
Qin et al. 2025, PMLR 267 proceedings PDF
protocol id
pheno-20261022-qin2025-protocol-al-top200
dataset version
Gene-level viability as processed in Qin et al. 2025 Appendix A.1
split
No held-out split; the whole screen is both the candidate pool and the ground truth
population
6,328 two-gene combinations of 112 genes
inputs
Single-gene viability effects of every gene, plus the measured viability of pairs acquired so far
adaptation
NAIAD ensemble; UCB acquisition
metric implementation
P_i = |X_i,P ∩ Y_i,P| at P = 200 (Appendix D)
aggregation
Not reported
budget
100 uniformly sampled seed pairs, then 100 acquired pairs in each of 4 rounds (500 measured pairs at round 4)

Metadata review: source checked. Unreported conditions prevent automatic comparisons.

Reproduction

Split
No held-out split; the whole screen is both the candidate pool and the ground truth
Adaptation
NAIAD ensemble; UCB acquisition
Scoring implementation
P_i = |X_i,P ∩ Y_i,P| at P = 200 (Appendix D)

No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.

Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

21 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-23-5347695500ed
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Comparison: adaptation
NAIAD ensemble; UCB acquisition
Context-only references
Qin et al. 2025, Active Learning for Efficient Discovery of Optimal Combinatorial Perturbations (ICML 2025, PMLR 267)

Original source ↗

Tables 2 and 3, row 'UCB', column 'Norman'

Version: Proceedings of the 42nd ICML, PMLR 267:50363-50383, 2025; proceedings PDF qin25g.pdf. The arXiv preprint 2411.12010 was not read.
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T13:57:27Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.adaptation

Source artifact SHA-256: 983b2da8aed78f0aced27053301c15f0f67ebd0fac706435bb6800e309dd64eb

Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/qin2025naiad.py

Inspected artifact

Comparison: aggregation
Not reported
Context-only references
Qin et al. 2025, Active Learning for Efficient Discovery of Optimal Combinatorial Perturbations (ICML 2025, PMLR 267)

Original source ↗

Tables 2 and 3, row 'UCB', column 'Norman'

Version: Proceedings of the 42nd ICML, PMLR 267:50363-50383, 2025; proceedings PDF qin25g.pdf. The arXiv preprint 2411.12010 was not read.
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T13:57:27Z

missing or unspecified

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.aggregation

Source artifact SHA-256: 983b2da8aed78f0aced27053301c15f0f67ebd0fac706435bb6800e309dd64eb

Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/qin2025naiad.py

Inspected artifact

Comparison: budget
100 uniformly sampled seed pairs, then 100 acquired pairs in each of 4 rounds (500 measured pairs at round 4)
Context-only references
Qin et al. 2025, Active Learning for Efficient Discovery of Optimal Combinatorial Perturbations (ICML 2025, PMLR 267)

Original source ↗

Tables 2 and 3, row 'UCB', column 'Norman'

Version: Proceedings of the 42nd ICML, PMLR 267:50363-50383, 2025; proceedings PDF qin25g.pdf. The arXiv preprint 2411.12010 was not read.
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T13:57:27Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.budget

Source artifact SHA-256: 983b2da8aed78f0aced27053301c15f0f67ebd0fac706435bb6800e309dd64eb

Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/qin2025naiad.py

Inspected artifact

Comparison: dataset version
Gene-level viability as processed in Qin et al. 2025 Appendix A.1
Context-only references
Qin et al. 2025, Active Learning for Efficient Discovery of Optimal Combinatorial Perturbations (ICML 2025, PMLR 267)

Original source ↗

Tables 2 and 3, row 'UCB', column 'Norman'

Version: Proceedings of the 42nd ICML, PMLR 267:50363-50383, 2025; proceedings PDF qin25g.pdf. The arXiv preprint 2411.12010 was not read.
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T13:57:27Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.dataset_version

Source artifact SHA-256: 983b2da8aed78f0aced27053301c15f0f67ebd0fac706435bb6800e309dd64eb

Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/qin2025naiad.py

Inspected artifact

Comparison: inputs
Single-gene viability effects of every gene, plus the measured viability of pairs acquired so far
Context-only references
Qin et al. 2025, Active Learning for Efficient Discovery of Optimal Combinatorial Perturbations (ICML 2025, PMLR 267)

Original source ↗

Tables 2 and 3, row 'UCB', column 'Norman'

Version: Proceedings of the 42nd ICML, PMLR 267:50363-50383, 2025; proceedings PDF qin25g.pdf. The arXiv preprint 2411.12010 was not read.
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T13:57:27Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.inputs

Source artifact SHA-256: 983b2da8aed78f0aced27053301c15f0f67ebd0fac706435bb6800e309dd64eb

Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/qin2025naiad.py

Inspected artifact

Comparison: metric implementation
P_i = |X_i,P ∩ Y_i,P| at P = 200 (Appendix D)
Context-only references
Qin et al. 2025, Active Learning for Efficient Discovery of Optimal Combinatorial Perturbations (ICML 2025, PMLR 267)

Original source ↗

Tables 2 and 3, row 'UCB', column 'Norman'

Version: Proceedings of the 42nd ICML, PMLR 267:50363-50383, 2025; proceedings PDF qin25g.pdf. The arXiv preprint 2411.12010 was not read.
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T13:57:27Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.metric_implementation

Source artifact SHA-256: 983b2da8aed78f0aced27053301c15f0f67ebd0fac706435bb6800e309dd64eb

Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/qin2025naiad.py

Inspected artifact

Comparison: population
6,328 two-gene combinations of 112 genes
Context-only references
Qin et al. 2025, Active Learning for Efficient Discovery of Optimal Combinatorial Perturbations (ICML 2025, PMLR 267)

Original source ↗

Tables 2 and 3, row 'UCB', column 'Norman'

Version: Proceedings of the 42nd ICML, PMLR 267:50363-50383, 2025; proceedings PDF qin25g.pdf. The arXiv preprint 2411.12010 was not read.
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T13:57:27Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.population

Source artifact SHA-256: 983b2da8aed78f0aced27053301c15f0f67ebd0fac706435bb6800e309dd64eb

Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/qin2025naiad.py

Inspected artifact

Comparison: protocol id
pheno-20261022-qin2025-protocol-al-top200
Context-only references
Qin et al. 2025, Active Learning for Efficient Discovery of Optimal Combinatorial Perturbations (ICML 2025, PMLR 267)

Original source ↗

Tables 2 and 3, row 'UCB', column 'Norman'

Version: Proceedings of the 42nd ICML, PMLR 267:50363-50383, 2025; proceedings PDF qin25g.pdf. The arXiv preprint 2411.12010 was not read.
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T13:57:27Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.protocol_id

Source artifact SHA-256: 983b2da8aed78f0aced27053301c15f0f67ebd0fac706435bb6800e309dd64eb

Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/qin2025naiad.py

Inspected artifact

Comparison: split
No held-out split; the whole screen is both the candidate pool and the ground truth
Context-only references
Qin et al. 2025, Active Learning for Efficient Discovery of Optimal Combinatorial Perturbations (ICML 2025, PMLR 267)

Original source ↗

Tables 2 and 3, row 'UCB', column 'Norman'

Version: Proceedings of the 42nd ICML, PMLR 267:50363-50383, 2025; proceedings PDF qin25g.pdf. The arXiv preprint 2411.12010 was not read.
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T13:57:27Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.split

Source artifact SHA-256: 983b2da8aed78f0aced27053301c15f0f67ebd0fac706435bb6800e309dd64eb

Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/qin2025naiad.py

Inspected artifact

Evaluation group id
qin2025-table2-3
Context-only references
Qin et al. 2025, Active Learning for Efficient Discovery of Optimal Combinatorial Perturbations (ICML 2025, PMLR 267)

Original source ↗

Tables 2 and 3, row 'UCB', column 'Norman'

Version: Proceedings of the 42nd ICML, PMLR 267:50363-50383, 2025; proceedings PDF qin25g.pdf. The arXiv preprint 2411.12010 was not read.
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T13:57:27Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.evaluation_group_id

Source artifact SHA-256: 983b2da8aed78f0aced27053301c15f0f67ebd0fac706435bb6800e309dd64eb

Hash scope: pdftotext -layout text layer, parsed by extract/qin2025naiad.py

Inspected artifact

How to read the evidence

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-23-5347695500ed · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: pheno-20261022-qin2025-eval-table2-3-naiad-ucb-norman2019

areas
cells-tissues
contexts
research
origin
author_reported
protocol
pheno-20261022-qin2025-protocol-al-top200
version
Qin et al. 2025, PMLR 267 proceedings PDF
comparison
protocol id: pheno-20261022-qin2025-protocol-al-top200; dataset version: Gene-level viability as processed in Qin et al. 2025 Appendix A.1; split: No held-out split; the whole screen is both the candidate pool and the ground truth; population: 6,328 two-gene combinations of 112 genes; inputs: Single-gene viability effects of every gene, plus the measured viability of pairs acquired so far; adaptation: NAIAD ensemble; UCB acquisition; metric implementation: P_i = |X_i,P ∩ Y_i,P| at P = 200 (Appendix D); aggregation: Not reported; budget: 100 uniformly sampled seed pairs, then 100 acquired pairs in each of 4 rounds (500 measured pairs at round 4)
evaluation group id
qin2025-table2-3
evaluation group name
Tables 2 and 3, acquisition functions with NAIAD
retrospective
true
source locator
Tables 2 and 3, row 'UCB', column 'Norman'
review
method: source-hash-verification; scope-review; independent-cell-check; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Claude (Opus 5.5) review agent, independent of the extraction agent; no human review claimed; date: 2026-10-22; artifact sha256: 983b2da8aed78f0aced27053301c15f0f67ebd0fac706435bb6800e309dd64eb; retrieval url: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mlresearch/v267/main/assets/qin25g/qin25g.pdf; method note: Re-hashed the PDF in the scratchpad (SHA-256 matches the source record). Read the captions and methods text in the pdftotext layer and on the rendered pages.; note: Origin, comparison fields, group, locator and links checked against the table caption, Sections 4.2, 4.3 and 5.3 and Appendices B to D.
missing metadata
aggregation: reason: unreported; note: The table prints no error and does not state how many runs or replicates it summarises.
Related records

Suggest a correction