| Comparison: adaptation None; tools run as released Context-only references | The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods Original source ↗ Table 2, row 'AlphaFold 3', column 'PoseBusters v2 (N = 308) % Success Rate' Version: PMC13292216.1 Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:27.507412+00:00 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded paper compilation Audit detailsField: attributes.comparison.adaptation Source artifact SHA-256: 6ff34f2f709a14858a3753abf9f8f6efa1e7e3c351f15c70cf64264193a9414e Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. Inspected artifact |
|---|
| Comparison: aggregation Share of complexes counted as successful Context-only references | The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods Original source ↗ Table 2, row 'AlphaFold 3', column 'PoseBusters v2 (N = 308) % Success Rate' Version: PMC13292216.1 Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:27.507412+00:00 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded paper compilation Audit detailsField: attributes.comparison.aggregation Source artifact SHA-256: 6ff34f2f709a14858a3753abf9f8f6efa1e7e3c351f15c70cf64264193a9414e Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. Inspected artifact |
|---|
| Comparison: budget Not reported Context-only references | The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods Original source ↗ Table 2, row 'AlphaFold 3', column 'PoseBusters v2 (N = 308) % Success Rate' Version: PMC13292216.1 Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:27.507412+00:00 | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded paper compilation Audit detailsField: attributes.comparison.budget Source artifact SHA-256: 6ff34f2f709a14858a3753abf9f8f6efa1e7e3c351f15c70cf64264193a9414e Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. Inspected artifact |
|---|
| Comparison: dataset version Not reported Context-only references | The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods Original source ↗ Table 2, row 'AlphaFold 3', column 'PoseBusters v2 (N = 308) % Success Rate' Version: PMC13292216.1 Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:27.507412+00:00 | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded paper compilation Audit detailsField: attributes.comparison.dataset_version Source artifact SHA-256: 6ff34f2f709a14858a3753abf9f8f6efa1e7e3c351f15c70cf64264193a9414e Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. Inspected artifact |
|---|
| Comparison: inputs Protein sequence or structure and the bound lipid or small molecule Context-only references | The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods Original source ↗ Table 2, row 'AlphaFold 3', column 'PoseBusters v2 (N = 308) % Success Rate' Version: PMC13292216.1 Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:27.507412+00:00 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded paper compilation Audit detailsField: attributes.comparison.inputs Source artifact SHA-256: 6ff34f2f709a14858a3753abf9f8f6efa1e7e3c351f15c70cf64264193a9414e Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. Inspected artifact |
|---|
| Comparison: metric implementation lipid pose all-atom RMSD below 2 Angstrom Context-only references | The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods Original source ↗ Table 2, row 'AlphaFold 3', column 'PoseBusters v2 (N = 308) % Success Rate' Version: PMC13292216.1 Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:27.507412+00:00 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded paper compilation Audit detailsField: attributes.comparison.metric_implementation Source artifact SHA-256: 6ff34f2f709a14858a3753abf9f8f6efa1e7e3c351f15c70cf64264193a9414e Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. Inspected artifact |
|---|
| Comparison: population 308 complexes Context-only references | The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods Original source ↗ Table 2, row 'AlphaFold 3', column 'PoseBusters v2 (N = 308) % Success Rate' Version: PMC13292216.1 Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:27.507412+00:00 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded paper compilation Audit detailsField: attributes.comparison.population Source artifact SHA-256: 6ff34f2f709a14858a3753abf9f8f6efa1e7e3c351f15c70cf64264193a9414e Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. Inspected artifact |
|---|
| Comparison: protocol id lit-structure-20261011-lipp-protocol-rmsd-posebusters-v2-308 Context-only references | The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods Original source ↗ Table 2, row 'AlphaFold 3', column 'PoseBusters v2 (N = 308) % Success Rate' Version: PMC13292216.1 Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:27.507412+00:00 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded paper compilation Audit detailsField: attributes.comparison.protocol_id Source artifact SHA-256: 6ff34f2f709a14858a3753abf9f8f6efa1e7e3c351f15c70cf64264193a9414e Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. Inspected artifact |
|---|
| Comparison: split PoseBusters v2 Context-only references | The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods Original source ↗ Table 2, row 'AlphaFold 3', column 'PoseBusters v2 (N = 308) % Success Rate' Version: PMC13292216.1 Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:27.507412+00:00 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded paper compilation Audit detailsField: attributes.comparison.split Source artifact SHA-256: 6ff34f2f709a14858a3753abf9f8f6efa1e7e3c351f15c70cf64264193a9414e Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. Inspected artifact |
|---|
Limitations1 values- Value reported by the AlphaFold 3 authors, who used a training cutoff of 2019-09-30 (table footnote a, dagger).
Context-only references | The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods Original source ↗ Table 2, row 'AlphaFold 3', column 'PoseBusters v2 (N = 308) % Success Rate' Version: PMC13292216.1 Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:27.507412+00:00 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded paper compilation Audit detailsField: attributes.limitations Source artifact SHA-256: 6ff34f2f709a14858a3753abf9f8f6efa1e7e3c351f15c70cf64264193a9414e Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. Inspected artifact |
|---|