rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Evaluation

RTMScore on AF3-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2)

Published result; transcribed, not reproduced.

Evaluation results

1 evaluation · 10 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Protocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring AF3-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, AF3 block) · Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025

Sorted by AUROC (AUROC, mean over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets) (higher is better). The best value in each column is highlighted. Decimals are rounded for display; each value links to the printed value and its source.

Tested configurationAUROC (AUROC, mean over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets)AUROC (AUROC, median over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets)Bedroc (BEDROC with alpha = 80.5, mean over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets)Bedroc (BEDROC with alpha = 80.5, median over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets)Enrichment factor (EF at the top 0.5% of the ranked library, mean over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets)Enrichment factor (EF at the top 0.5% of the ranked library, median over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets)Enrichment factor (EF at the top 1% of the ranked library, mean over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets)Enrichment factor (EF at the top 1% of the ranked library, median over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets)Enrichment factor (EF at the top 5% of the ranked library, mean over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets)Enrichment factor (EF at the top 5% of the ranked library, median over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets)
RTMScore rescoring of AF3 top-ranked posesEvaluation0.8650.9060.6740.78722.426.621.326.212.313
All 10 result rows with coverage, uncertainty and sources
Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: RTMScore rescoring of AF3 top-ranked posesProtocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring AF3-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, AF3 block)
Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025
0.865 AUROC (AUROC, mean over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

RTMScore on AF3-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2)

hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-af3

Aggregation: Not reported

Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, AF3 block, row 'RTMScore', column 'AUROC' (Mean)
Configuration: RTMScore rescoring of AF3 top-ranked posesProtocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring AF3-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, AF3 block)
Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025
0.906 AUROC (AUROC, median over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

RTMScore on AF3-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2)

hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-af3

Aggregation: Not reported

Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, AF3 block, row 'RTMScore', column 'AUROC' (Med)
Configuration: RTMScore rescoring of AF3 top-ranked posesProtocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring AF3-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, AF3 block)
Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025
0.674 Bedroc (BEDROC with alpha = 80.5, mean over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

RTMScore on AF3-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2)

hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-af3

Aggregation: Not reported

Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, AF3 block, row 'RTMScore', column 'BEDROC (α = 80.5)' (Mean)
Configuration: RTMScore rescoring of AF3 top-ranked posesProtocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring AF3-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, AF3 block)
Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025
0.787 Bedroc (BEDROC with alpha = 80.5, median over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

RTMScore on AF3-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2)

hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-af3

Aggregation: Not reported

Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, AF3 block, row 'RTMScore', column 'BEDROC (α = 80.5)' (Med)
Configuration: RTMScore rescoring of AF3 top-ranked posesProtocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring AF3-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, AF3 block)
Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025
22.4 Enrichment factor (EF at the top 0.5% of the ranked library, mean over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

RTMScore on AF3-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2)

hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-af3

Aggregation: Not reported

Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, AF3 block, row 'RTMScore', column 'EF0.5%' (Mean)
Configuration: RTMScore rescoring of AF3 top-ranked posesProtocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring AF3-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, AF3 block)
Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025
26.6 Enrichment factor (EF at the top 0.5% of the ranked library, median over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

RTMScore on AF3-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2)

hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-af3

Aggregation: Not reported

Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, AF3 block, row 'RTMScore', column 'EF0.5%' (Med)
Configuration: RTMScore rescoring of AF3 top-ranked posesProtocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring AF3-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, AF3 block)
Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025
21.3 Enrichment factor (EF at the top 1% of the ranked library, mean over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

RTMScore on AF3-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2)

hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-af3

Aggregation: Not reported

Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, AF3 block, row 'RTMScore', column 'EF1%' (Mean)
Configuration: RTMScore rescoring of AF3 top-ranked posesProtocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring AF3-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, AF3 block)
Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025
26.2 Enrichment factor (EF at the top 1% of the ranked library, median over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

RTMScore on AF3-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2)

hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-af3

Aggregation: Not reported

Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, AF3 block, row 'RTMScore', column 'EF1%' (Med)
Configuration: RTMScore rescoring of AF3 top-ranked posesProtocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring AF3-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, AF3 block)
Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025
12.3 Enrichment factor (EF at the top 5% of the ranked library, mean over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

RTMScore on AF3-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2)

hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-af3

Aggregation: Not reported

Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, AF3 block, row 'RTMScore', column 'EF5%' (Mean)
Configuration: RTMScore rescoring of AF3 top-ranked posesProtocol: DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring AF3-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, AF3 block)
Dataset: DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025
13 Enrichment factor (EF at the top 5% of the ranked library, median over the 79 DEKOIS 2.0 targets)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: The source prints no interval or spread for this value

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

RTMScore on AF3-predicted DEKOIS 2.0 complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2)

hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-af3

Aggregation: Not reported

Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text) · Table 2, AF3 block, row 'RTMScore', column 'EF5%' (Med)

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.

Research readiness

0 of 4 readiness checks met. These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation; a source-checked score alone does not meet them.

Readiness checks, gaps and artifacts

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Evidence verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Replay metrics

Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • Metrics are recomputed from the saved predictions: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Investigate discrepancies

Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • Metrics are recomputed from the saved predictions: not yet verified
  • Sample annotations are recorded: not yet verified
  • Dependence between samples is assessed: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Run locally

A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • A pinned run recipe exists: not yet verified
  • Compute requirements are estimated: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Validate independently

Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • Independent validation data exist: not yet verified
  • Overlap with training data is checked: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.

Artifacts and reproduction

No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.

Evaluation procedure

DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring AF3-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, AF3 block)

Configuration
RTMScore rescoring of AF3 top-ranked poses
Protocol
DEKOIS 2.0 screening by rescoring AF3-predicted complexes (Shen et al. 2025 Table 2, AF3 block)
Dataset
DEKOIS 2.0, 79 targets as scored by Shen et al. 2025
origin
Author-reported evaluation
configuration
Not reported
dataset version
DEKOIS 2.0 as distributed at http://www.dekois.com
split
All 79 evaluated targets; no training or test split applies
population
79 targets, 40 actives and 1200 property-matched decoys each (1:30)
inputs
Protein sequence and ligand SMILES with pre-computed MSAs; the top-ranked of five AF3-predicted poses is then rescored
adaptation
None; pretrained models and default or recommended settings
metric implementation
AUROC, BEDROC with alpha = 80.5 (the top 2% of the ranked list contributes 80% of the score), and enrichment factors at 0.5%, 1% and 5%, each reported as the mean and the median over targets. EFx% is the ratio of true positives found in the top x% of the ranked compounds relative to random selection.
aggregation
Mean and median of the per-target metric over the targets
budget
Not reported
protocol id
hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-af3

Metadata review: source checked. Unreported conditions prevent automatic comparisons.

Reproduction

Split
All 79 evaluated targets; no training or test split applies
Adaptation
None; pretrained models and default or recommended settings
Scoring implementation
AUROC, BEDROC with alpha = 80.5 (the top 2% of the ranked list contributes 80% of the score), and enrichment factors at 0.5%, 1% and 5%, each reported as the mean and the median over targets. EFx% is the ratio of true positives found in the top x% of the ranked compounds relative to random selection.

No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.

Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

18 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Comparison: adaptation
None; pretrained models and default or recommended settings
Context-only references
Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text)

Original source ↗

Table 2, AF3 block, row 'RTMScore'

Version: PMC12704515 (Chem Sci, published 2025-12-11)
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:52:32Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.adaptation

Source artifact SHA-256: 11a4cee97057d9e72f9393024d22fdd169e3134f493367eee2f7869facf9ccf8

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Comparison: aggregation
Mean and median of the per-target metric over the targets
Context-only references
Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text)

Original source ↗

Table 2, AF3 block, row 'RTMScore'

Version: PMC12704515 (Chem Sci, published 2025-12-11)
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:52:32Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.aggregation

Source artifact SHA-256: 11a4cee97057d9e72f9393024d22fdd169e3134f493367eee2f7869facf9ccf8

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Comparison: budget
Not reported
Context-only references
Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text)

Original source ↗

Table 2, AF3 block, row 'RTMScore'

Version: PMC12704515 (Chem Sci, published 2025-12-11)
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:52:32Z

missing or unspecified

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.budget

Source artifact SHA-256: 11a4cee97057d9e72f9393024d22fdd169e3134f493367eee2f7869facf9ccf8

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Comparison: dataset version
DEKOIS 2.0 as distributed at http://www.dekois.com
Context-only references
Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text)

Original source ↗

Table 2, AF3 block, row 'RTMScore'

Version: PMC12704515 (Chem Sci, published 2025-12-11)
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:52:32Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.dataset_version

Source artifact SHA-256: 11a4cee97057d9e72f9393024d22fdd169e3134f493367eee2f7869facf9ccf8

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Comparison: inputs
Protein sequence and ligand SMILES with pre-computed MSAs; the top-ranked of five AF3-predicted poses is then rescored
Context-only references
Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text)

Original source ↗

Table 2, AF3 block, row 'RTMScore'

Version: PMC12704515 (Chem Sci, published 2025-12-11)
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:52:32Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.inputs

Source artifact SHA-256: 11a4cee97057d9e72f9393024d22fdd169e3134f493367eee2f7869facf9ccf8

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Comparison: metric implementation
AUROC, BEDROC with alpha = 80.5 (the top 2% of the ranked list contributes 80% of the score), and enrichment factors at 0.5%, 1% and 5%, each reported as the mean and the median over targets. EFx% is the ratio of true positives found in the top x% of the ranked compounds relative to random selection.
Context-only references
Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text)

Original source ↗

Table 2, AF3 block, row 'RTMScore'

Version: PMC12704515 (Chem Sci, published 2025-12-11)
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:52:32Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.metric_implementation

Source artifact SHA-256: 11a4cee97057d9e72f9393024d22fdd169e3134f493367eee2f7869facf9ccf8

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Comparison: population
79 targets, 40 actives and 1200 property-matched decoys each (1:30)
Context-only references
Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text)

Original source ↗

Table 2, AF3 block, row 'RTMScore'

Version: PMC12704515 (Chem Sci, published 2025-12-11)
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:52:32Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.population

Source artifact SHA-256: 11a4cee97057d9e72f9393024d22fdd169e3134f493367eee2f7869facf9ccf8

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Comparison: protocol id
hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-af3
Context-only references
Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text)

Original source ↗

Table 2, AF3 block, row 'RTMScore'

Version: PMC12704515 (Chem Sci, published 2025-12-11)
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:52:32Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.protocol_id

Source artifact SHA-256: 11a4cee97057d9e72f9393024d22fdd169e3134f493367eee2f7869facf9ccf8

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Comparison: split
All 79 evaluated targets; no training or test split applies
Context-only references
Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text)

Original source ↗

Table 2, AF3 block, row 'RTMScore'

Version: PMC12704515 (Chem Sci, published 2025-12-11)
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:52:32Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.split

Source artifact SHA-256: 11a4cee97057d9e72f9393024d22fdd169e3134f493367eee2f7869facf9ccf8

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Origin
author_reported
Context-only references
Shen et al. 2025, Chemical Science (Europe PMC full text)

Original source ↗

Table 2, AF3 block, row 'RTMScore'

Version: PMC12704515 (Chem Sci, published 2025-12-11)
Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:52:32Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.origin

Source artifact SHA-256: 11a4cee97057d9e72f9393024d22fdd169e3134f493367eee2f7869facf9ccf8

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

How to read the evidence

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: hitdisc-20261022-eval-dekois-rescore-af3-rescore-rtmscore-on-af3-poses

areas
molecular-interactions
contexts
research
origin
author_reported
protocol
hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-af3
comparison
dataset version: DEKOIS 2.0 as distributed at http://www.dekois.com; split: All 79 evaluated targets; no training or test split applies; population: 79 targets, 40 actives and 1200 property-matched decoys each (1:30); inputs: Protein sequence and ligand SMILES with pre-computed MSAs; the top-ranked of five AF3-predicted poses is then rescored; adaptation: None; pretrained models and default or recommended settings; metric implementation: AUROC, BEDROC with alpha = 80.5 (the top 2% of the ranked list contributes 80% of the score), and enrichment factors at 0.5%, 1% and 5%, each reported as the mean and the median over targets. EFx% is the ratio of true positives found in the top x% of the ranked compounds relative to random selection.; aggregation: Mean and median of the per-target metric over the targets; budget: Not reported; protocol id: hitdisc-20261022-protocol-shen-dekois-rescore-af3
source locator
Table 2, AF3 block, row 'RTMScore'
review
method: scope-review; automated-source-review; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Claude review agent, independent of the extraction agent; no human review claimed; date: 2026-10-22; method note: Read the record against the pinned sources and against docs/use-cases.md and docs/record-contract.md.; note: Record checked against the pinned source and the record contract. Transcription checked; not reproduced and not reviewed by a human scientist.; artifact sha256: 11a4cee97057d9e72f9393024d22fdd169e3134f493367eee2f7869facf9ccf8; retrieval url: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12704515/fullTextXML; receipt: data/omics/use-case-coverage-hitdisc-20261022/review.json
missing metadata
comparison.budget: reason: unreported; note: No compute budget is stated for this table
retrospective
true
Related records

Suggest a correction