GENEB evaluation of LucaOne on Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, linear probe, scored with Macro-MCC.
These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation. A source-checked score alone does not meet these requirements.
Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Evidence verified: Not verified
Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.
No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.
1 evaluation · 1 result. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: LucaOne | Task: GENEB LINEAR-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, linear probe Dataset subset: GENEB representative task subset (GENEB split) | 0.573 macro_mcc correlation · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceLucaOne on GENEB LINEAR-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, linear probe Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7). Aggregation: Not reported GENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(LucaOne), column(Linear MCC) |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220.
Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).
Metadata review: source checked. Unreported conditions prevent automatic comparisons.
No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.
Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
10 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| attributes.comparison.metric_implementation Macro-MCC Context-only references | GENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare Table 8, row(LucaOne), column(Linear MCC) Version: 2606.04525v1 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.comparison.protocol_id geneb-task-linear-probe Context-only references | GENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare Table 8, row(LucaOne), column(Linear MCC) Version: 2606.04525v1 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.origin author_reported Context-only references | GENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare Table 8, row(LucaOne), column(Linear MCC) Version: 2606.04525v1 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.protocol Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7). Context-only references | GENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare Table 8, row(LucaOne), column(Linear MCC) Version: 2606.04525v1 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.source_locator Table 8, row(LucaOne), column(Linear MCC) Context-only references | GENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare Table 8, row(LucaOne), column(Linear MCC) Version: 2606.04525v1 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| description GENEB evaluation of LucaOne on Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, linear probe, scored with Macro-MCC. Context-only references | GENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare Table 8, row(LucaOne), column(Linear MCC) Version: 2606.04525v1 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| Relationship: benchmark geneb-task-linear-probe Context-only references | GENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare Table 8, row(LucaOne), column(Linear MCC) Version: 2606.04525v1 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| Relationship: dataset geneb-dataset-geneb-representative-task-subset Context-only references | GENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare Table 8, row(LucaOne), column(Linear MCC) Version: 2606.04525v1 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| Relationship: model geneb-method-lucaone Context-only references | GENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare Table 8, row(LucaOne), column(Linear MCC) Version: 2606.04525v1 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| name LucaOne on GENEB LINEAR-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, linear probe Context-only references | GENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare Table 8, row(LucaOne), column(Linear MCC) Version: 2606.04525v1 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: source checked
Stable ID: geneb-evaluation-lucaone-linear-probe