Published comparison; transcribed, not reproduced.
These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation. A source-checked score alone does not meet these requirements.
Release 2026-10-10-7b8f80935f90 · Evidence verified: Not verified
Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.
No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.
1 evaluation · 1 result. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: Llama 3.1 70B, basic prompt, temperature 0.8 (default) (Lin et al. 2025) | Protocol: Lin et al. 2025 FoundationOne variants: clinically relevant vs VUS Dataset: FoundationOne CDx report variants, 612 patients (Lin et al. 2025) | 0.498 top-1-accuracy fraction · higher Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.4974 to 0.4978 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcellama-basic-t0-8 on foundationone (Lin et al. 2025) egfrnsclc-20261009-protocol-lin2025-foundationone-relevant-vs-vus Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking large language models GPT-4o, llama 3.1, and qwen 2.5 for cancer genetic variant classification · Table 1 (Tab1), row 'Foundationone', column 'Llama 3' Mean accuracy; 95% CI in the next column |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-10-7b8f80935f90.
egfrnsclc-20261009-protocol-lin2025-foundationone-relevant-vs-vus
Metadata review: source checked. Unreported conditions prevent automatic comparisons.
No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.
Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
18 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| attributes.comparison.adaptation Prompting only Context-only references | Benchmarking large language models GPT-4o, llama 3.1, and qwen 2.5 for cancer genetic variant classification Table 1 row 'Foundationone', columns for Llama 3 Version: npj Precision Oncology 9:141, published 2025-05-15; PMC12078457 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded independent paper Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.comparison.aggregation Mean over 100 iterations Context-only references | Benchmarking large language models GPT-4o, llama 3.1, and qwen 2.5 for cancer genetic variant classification Table 1 row 'Foundationone', columns for Llama 3 Version: npj Precision Oncology 9:141, published 2025-05-15; PMC12078457 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded independent paper Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.comparison.budget Not reported Context-only references | Benchmarking large language models GPT-4o, llama 3.1, and qwen 2.5 for cancer genetic variant classification Table 1 row 'Foundationone', columns for Llama 3 Version: npj Precision Oncology 9:141, published 2025-05-15; PMC12078457 full-text XML | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded independent paper Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.comparison.dataset_version egfrnsclc-20261009-data-lin2025-foundationone-variants Context-only references | Benchmarking large language models GPT-4o, llama 3.1, and qwen 2.5 for cancer genetic variant classification Table 1 row 'Foundationone', columns for Llama 3 Version: npj Precision Oncology 9:141, published 2025-05-15; PMC12078457 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded independent paper Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.comparison.inputs Gene, alteration and tumour type as a natural-language query Context-only references | Benchmarking large language models GPT-4o, llama 3.1, and qwen 2.5 for cancer genetic variant classification Table 1 row 'Foundationone', columns for Llama 3 Version: npj Precision Oncology 9:141, published 2025-05-15; PMC12078457 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded independent paper Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.comparison.metric_implementation Top-1 answer compared with the reference level Context-only references | Benchmarking large language models GPT-4o, llama 3.1, and qwen 2.5 for cancer genetic variant classification Table 1 row 'Foundationone', columns for Llama 3 Version: npj Precision Oncology 9:141, published 2025-05-15; PMC12078457 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded independent paper Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.comparison.population clinically relevant vs VUS via CIViC levels Context-only references | Benchmarking large language models GPT-4o, llama 3.1, and qwen 2.5 for cancer genetic variant classification Table 1 row 'Foundationone', columns for Llama 3 Version: npj Precision Oncology 9:141, published 2025-05-15; PMC12078457 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded independent paper Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.comparison.protocol_id egfrnsclc-20261009-protocol-lin2025-foundationone-relevant-vs-vus Context-only references | Benchmarking large language models GPT-4o, llama 3.1, and qwen 2.5 for cancer genetic variant classification Table 1 row 'Foundationone', columns for Llama 3 Version: npj Precision Oncology 9:141, published 2025-05-15; PMC12078457 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded independent paper Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.comparison.split Whole table; no training split (prompted models) Context-only references | Benchmarking large language models GPT-4o, llama 3.1, and qwen 2.5 for cancer genetic variant classification Table 1 row 'Foundationone', columns for Llama 3 Version: npj Precision Oncology 9:141, published 2025-05-15; PMC12078457 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded independent paper Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.origin independent_paper Context-only references | Benchmarking large language models GPT-4o, llama 3.1, and qwen 2.5 for cancer genetic variant classification Table 1 row 'Foundationone', columns for Llama 3 Version: npj Precision Oncology 9:141, published 2025-05-15; PMC12078457 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded independent paper Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
Release 2026-10-10-7b8f80935f90 · Record review: source checked
Stable ID: egfrnsclc-20261009-eval-lin2025-llama-basic-t0-8-foundationone