| Configuration: Basenji2 | Protocol: Enformer CAGE gene-expression comparison Across genes CAGE Pearson: Mean across-experiment Pearson correlation of human test-gene CAGE expression Dataset subset: Enformer/Basenji2 human held-out test genes and CAGE experiments (Enformer CAGE gene-expression comparison split) | 0.81 mean_across_experiment_gene_pearson dimensionless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBasenji2 on Enformer CAGE gene-expression comparison Across genes CAGE Pearson: Mean across-experiment Pearson correlation of human test-gene CAGE expression Human held-out test-set protein-coding genes; CAGE read counts summed over all unique TSS locations, using TSS-overlapping 128-bp bin plus two neighboring bins, log(1+x)-transformed and standardized across genes separately per experiment. Pearson correlation across genes per CAGE experiment, then mean across experiments. Same Basenji2 dataset and genomic intervals; human split 34,021 training/2,213 validation/1,937 test sequences. Cross-species homologous 1 Mb regions partitioned by connected components. Test-time mean of 8 random ≤3 bp shift/reverse-complement augmentations. Enformer input 196,608 bp, Basenji2 131,072 bp; receptive fields differ. Validation used for tuning; main comparison on test set. Aggregation: Not reported Enformer primary article: exact Figure 1b across-genes comparison reported in text · Results / Enformer improves gene expression prediction, Par7; Fig1b left caption; Methods Par32–36; exact narrative comparison, Basenji2 value 0.81 |
|---|
| Configuration: Enformer | Protocol: Enformer CAGE gene-expression comparison Across genes CAGE Pearson: Mean across-experiment Pearson correlation of human test-gene CAGE expression Dataset subset: Enformer/Basenji2 human held-out test genes and CAGE experiments (Enformer CAGE gene-expression comparison split) | 0.85 mean_across_experiment_gene_pearson dimensionless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceEnformer on Enformer CAGE gene-expression comparison Across genes CAGE Pearson: Mean across-experiment Pearson correlation of human test-gene CAGE expression Human held-out test-set protein-coding genes; CAGE read counts summed over all unique TSS locations, using TSS-overlapping 128-bp bin plus two neighboring bins, log(1+x)-transformed and standardized across genes separately per experiment. Pearson correlation across genes per CAGE experiment, then mean across experiments. Same Basenji2 dataset and genomic intervals; human split 34,021 training/2,213 validation/1,937 test sequences. Cross-species homologous 1 Mb regions partitioned by connected components. Test-time mean of 8 random ≤3 bp shift/reverse-complement augmentations. Enformer input 196,608 bp, Basenji2 131,072 bp; receptive fields differ. Validation used for tuning; main comparison on test set. Aggregation: Not reported Enformer primary article: exact Figure 1b across-genes comparison reported in text · Results / Enformer improves gene expression prediction, Par7; Fig1b left caption; Methods Par32–36; exact narrative comparison, Enformer value 0.85 |
|---|