| Configuration: AlphaFold3 3.0.1, 50 diffusion samples, seed 1, built-in data pipeline (Smorodina et al. 2026) | Protocol: Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes | 0.24 dockq unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceAF3 on Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026) structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-dockq-vs-sampling Aggregation: Not reported Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P36, AF3 (0.24 to 0.68), N = 1 |
|---|
| Configuration: AlphaFold3 3.0.1, 50 diffusion samples, seed 1, built-in data pipeline (Smorodina et al. 2026) | Protocol: Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes | 0.68 dockq unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceAF3 on Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026) structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-dockq-vs-sampling Aggregation: Not reported Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P36, AF3 (0.24 to 0.68), N = 100 |
|---|
| Configuration: Boltz-1 via Boltz CLI v2.2.0, MSA server (Smorodina et al. 2026) | Protocol: Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes | 0.06 dockq unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBoltz-1 on Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026) structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-dockq-vs-sampling Aggregation: Not reported Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P36, Boltz-1 (0.06 to 0.26), N = 1 |
|---|
| Configuration: Boltz-1 via Boltz CLI v2.2.0, MSA server (Smorodina et al. 2026) | Protocol: Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes | 0.26 dockq unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBoltz-1 on Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026) structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-dockq-vs-sampling Aggregation: Not reported Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P36, Boltz-1 (0.06 to 0.26), N = 100 |
|---|
| Configuration: Boltz-2 via Boltz CLI v2.2.0, 50 diffusion samples, seed 42, MSA server (Smorodina et al. 2026) | Protocol: Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes | 0.57 dockq unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBoltz-2 on Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026) structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-dockq-vs-sampling Aggregation: Not reported Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P36, Boltz-2 (0.57 to 0.80), N = 1 |
|---|
| Configuration: Boltz-2 via Boltz CLI v2.2.0, 50 diffusion samples, seed 42, MSA server (Smorodina et al. 2026) | Protocol: Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes | 0.8 dockq unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBoltz-2 on Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026) structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-dockq-vs-sampling Aggregation: Not reported Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P36, Boltz-2 (0.57 to 0.80), N = 100 |
|---|
| Configuration: Chai-1 0.6.1, 5 trunk x 10 diffusion samples, seed 42, ESM embeddings without MSAs (Smorodina et al. 2026) | Protocol: Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes | 0.04 dockq unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceChai-1 on Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026) structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-dockq-vs-sampling Aggregation: Not reported Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P36, Chai-1 (0.04 to 0.19), N = 1 |
|---|
| Configuration: Chai-1 0.6.1, 5 trunk x 10 diffusion samples, seed 42, ESM embeddings without MSAs (Smorodina et al. 2026) | Protocol: Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes | 0.19 dockq unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceChai-1 on Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026) structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-dockq-vs-sampling Aggregation: Not reported Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P36, Chai-1 (0.04 to 0.19), N = 100 |
|---|
| Configuration: AlphaFold3 3.0.1, 50 diffusion samples, seed 1, built-in data pipeline (Smorodina et al. 2026) | Protocol: How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes | 0.736 pearson-correlation unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceAF3 on How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026) structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-iptm-dockq-calibration Aggregation: Not reported Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P19, AF3: ipTM against DockQ for the best-DockQ sample of each complex |
|---|
| Configuration: AlphaFold3 3.0.1, 50 diffusion samples, seed 1, built-in data pipeline (Smorodina et al. 2026) | Protocol: How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes | -0.027 pearson-correlation unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceAF3 on How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026) structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-iptm-dockq-calibration Aggregation: Not reported Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P21, AF3: change in ipTM against change in DockQ under saturation sampling |
|---|
| Configuration: AlphaFold3 3.0.1, 50 diffusion samples, seed 1, built-in data pipeline (Smorodina et al. 2026) | Protocol: How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes | 2% proportion percent · lower Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceAF3 on How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026) structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-iptm-dockq-calibration Aggregation: Not reported Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P19, AF3: share of predictions with ipTM at least 0.5 and DockQ below 0.23 (confident failures, Q2) |
|---|
| Configuration: AlphaFold3 3.0.1, 50 diffusion samples, seed 1, built-in data pipeline (Smorodina et al. 2026) | Protocol: How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes | 28% proportion percent · lower Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceAF3 on How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026) structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-iptm-dockq-calibration Aggregation: Not reported Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P19, AF3: share of predictions with ipTM below 0.5 and DockQ at least 0.23 (unconfident successes, Q4) |
|---|
| Configuration: AlphaFold3 3.0.1, 50 diffusion samples, seed 1, built-in data pipeline (Smorodina et al. 2026) | Protocol: How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes | 0.888 pearson-correlation unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceAF3 on How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026) structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-iptm-dockq-calibration Aggregation: Not reported Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P19, AF3: ipTM against DockQ for the first sample (sample0) of each complex |
|---|
| Configuration: Boltz-2 via Boltz CLI v2.2.0, 50 diffusion samples, seed 42, MSA server (Smorodina et al. 2026) | Protocol: How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes | 0.665 pearson-correlation unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBoltz-2 on How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026) structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-iptm-dockq-calibration Aggregation: Not reported Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P19, Boltz-2: ipTM against DockQ for the best-DockQ sample of each complex |
|---|
| Configuration: Boltz-2 via Boltz CLI v2.2.0, 50 diffusion samples, seed 42, MSA server (Smorodina et al. 2026) | Protocol: How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes | -0.04 pearson-correlation unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBoltz-2 on How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026) structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-iptm-dockq-calibration Aggregation: Not reported Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P21, Boltz-2: change in ipTM against change in DockQ under saturation sampling |
|---|
| Configuration: Boltz-2 via Boltz CLI v2.2.0, 50 diffusion samples, seed 42, MSA server (Smorodina et al. 2026) | Protocol: How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes | 18% proportion percent · lower Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBoltz-2 on How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026) structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-iptm-dockq-calibration Aggregation: Not reported Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P19, Boltz-2: share of predictions with ipTM at least 0.5 and DockQ below 0.23 (confident failures, Q2) |
|---|
| Configuration: Boltz-2 via Boltz CLI v2.2.0, 50 diffusion samples, seed 42, MSA server (Smorodina et al. 2026) | Protocol: How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes | 0.493 pearson-correlation unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBoltz-2 on How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026) structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-iptm-dockq-calibration Aggregation: Not reported Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P19, Boltz-2: ipTM against DockQ for the first sample (sample0) of each complex |
|---|
| Configuration: Chai-1 0.6.1, 5 trunk x 10 diffusion samples, seed 42, ESM embeddings without MSAs (Smorodina et al. 2026) | Protocol: How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes | 0.612 pearson-correlation unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceChai-1 on How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026) structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-iptm-dockq-calibration Aggregation: Not reported Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P19, Chai-1: ipTM against DockQ for the best-DockQ sample of each complex |
|---|
| Configuration: Chai-1 0.6.1, 5 trunk x 10 diffusion samples, seed 42, ESM embeddings without MSAs (Smorodina et al. 2026) | Protocol: How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes | -0.019 pearson-correlation unitless · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceChai-1 on How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026) structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-iptm-dockq-calibration Aggregation: Not reported Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P21, Chai-1: change in ipTM against change in DockQ under saturation sampling |
|---|
| Configuration: Chai-1 0.6.1, 5 trunk x 10 diffusion samples, seed 42, ESM embeddings without MSAs (Smorodina et al. 2026) | Protocol: How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes | 24% proportion percent · lower Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceChai-1 on How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026) structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-iptm-dockq-calibration Aggregation: Not reported Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P19, Chai-1: share of predictions with ipTM below 0.5 and DockQ at least 0.23 (unconfident successes, Q4) |
|---|