rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Dataset

Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes

Experimentally determined nanobody-antigen complexes, used as the real (cognate) systems.

Research readiness

These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation. A source-checked score alone does not meet these requirements.

Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc · Evidence verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Replay metrics

Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • artifact hashes: verification is missing
  • join integrity: verification is missing
  • score semantics: verification is missing
  • metric replay: verification is missing

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Investigate discrepancies

Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • artifact hashes: verification is missing
  • join integrity: verification is missing
  • score semantics: verification is missing
  • metric replay: verification is missing
  • annotations: verification is missing
  • dependence: verification is missing

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Run locally

A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • artifact hashes: verification is missing
  • join integrity: verification is missing
  • score semantics: verification is missing
  • recipe pinned: verification is missing
  • resource estimate: verification is missing

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Validate independently

Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • artifact hashes: verification is missing
  • join integrity: verification is missing
  • score semantics: verification is missing
  • independent validation: verification is missing
  • overlap checked: verification is missing

Verified: Not verified

Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.

Artifacts and reproduction

No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.

Read reviewed discrepancy investigations

Evaluation results

7 evaluations · 20 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: AlphaFold3 3.0.1, 50 diffusion samples, seed 1, built-in data pipeline (Smorodina et al. 2026)Protocol: Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes
Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes
0.24 dockq
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

AF3 on Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026)

structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-dockq-vs-sampling

Aggregation: Not reported

Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P36, AF3 (0.24 to 0.68), N = 1
Configuration: AlphaFold3 3.0.1, 50 diffusion samples, seed 1, built-in data pipeline (Smorodina et al. 2026)Protocol: Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes
Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes
0.68 dockq
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

AF3 on Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026)

structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-dockq-vs-sampling

Aggregation: Not reported

Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P36, AF3 (0.24 to 0.68), N = 100
Configuration: Boltz-1 via Boltz CLI v2.2.0, MSA server (Smorodina et al. 2026)Protocol: Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes
Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes
0.06 dockq
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Boltz-1 on Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026)

structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-dockq-vs-sampling

Aggregation: Not reported

Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P36, Boltz-1 (0.06 to 0.26), N = 1
Configuration: Boltz-1 via Boltz CLI v2.2.0, MSA server (Smorodina et al. 2026)Protocol: Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes
Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes
0.26 dockq
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Boltz-1 on Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026)

structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-dockq-vs-sampling

Aggregation: Not reported

Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P36, Boltz-1 (0.06 to 0.26), N = 100
Configuration: Boltz-2 via Boltz CLI v2.2.0, 50 diffusion samples, seed 42, MSA server (Smorodina et al. 2026)Protocol: Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes
Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes
0.57 dockq
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Boltz-2 on Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026)

structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-dockq-vs-sampling

Aggregation: Not reported

Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P36, Boltz-2 (0.57 to 0.80), N = 1
Configuration: Boltz-2 via Boltz CLI v2.2.0, 50 diffusion samples, seed 42, MSA server (Smorodina et al. 2026)Protocol: Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes
Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes
0.8 dockq
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Boltz-2 on Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026)

structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-dockq-vs-sampling

Aggregation: Not reported

Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P36, Boltz-2 (0.57 to 0.80), N = 100
Configuration: Chai-1 0.6.1, 5 trunk x 10 diffusion samples, seed 42, ESM embeddings without MSAs (Smorodina et al. 2026)Protocol: Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes
Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes
0.04 dockq
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Chai-1 on Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026)

structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-dockq-vs-sampling

Aggregation: Not reported

Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P36, Chai-1 (0.04 to 0.19), N = 1
Configuration: Chai-1 0.6.1, 5 trunk x 10 diffusion samples, seed 42, ESM embeddings without MSAs (Smorodina et al. 2026)Protocol: Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes
Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes
0.19 dockq
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Chai-1 on Best DockQ against sampling depth on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026)

structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-dockq-vs-sampling

Aggregation: Not reported

Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P36, Chai-1 (0.04 to 0.19), N = 100
Configuration: AlphaFold3 3.0.1, 50 diffusion samples, seed 1, built-in data pipeline (Smorodina et al. 2026)Protocol: How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes
Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes
0.736 pearson-correlation
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

AF3 on How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026)

structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-iptm-dockq-calibration

Aggregation: Not reported

Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P19, AF3: ipTM against DockQ for the best-DockQ sample of each complex
Configuration: AlphaFold3 3.0.1, 50 diffusion samples, seed 1, built-in data pipeline (Smorodina et al. 2026)Protocol: How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes
Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes
-0.027 pearson-correlation
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

AF3 on How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026)

structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-iptm-dockq-calibration

Aggregation: Not reported

Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P21, AF3: change in ipTM against change in DockQ under saturation sampling
Configuration: AlphaFold3 3.0.1, 50 diffusion samples, seed 1, built-in data pipeline (Smorodina et al. 2026)Protocol: How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes
Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes
2% proportion
percent · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

AF3 on How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026)

structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-iptm-dockq-calibration

Aggregation: Not reported

Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P19, AF3: share of predictions with ipTM at least 0.5 and DockQ below 0.23 (confident failures, Q2)
Configuration: AlphaFold3 3.0.1, 50 diffusion samples, seed 1, built-in data pipeline (Smorodina et al. 2026)Protocol: How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes
Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes
28% proportion
percent · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

AF3 on How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026)

structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-iptm-dockq-calibration

Aggregation: Not reported

Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P19, AF3: share of predictions with ipTM below 0.5 and DockQ at least 0.23 (unconfident successes, Q4)
Configuration: AlphaFold3 3.0.1, 50 diffusion samples, seed 1, built-in data pipeline (Smorodina et al. 2026)Protocol: How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes
Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes
0.888 pearson-correlation
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

AF3 on How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026)

structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-iptm-dockq-calibration

Aggregation: Not reported

Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P19, AF3: ipTM against DockQ for the first sample (sample0) of each complex
Configuration: Boltz-2 via Boltz CLI v2.2.0, 50 diffusion samples, seed 42, MSA server (Smorodina et al. 2026)Protocol: How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes
Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes
0.665 pearson-correlation
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Boltz-2 on How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026)

structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-iptm-dockq-calibration

Aggregation: Not reported

Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P19, Boltz-2: ipTM against DockQ for the best-DockQ sample of each complex
Configuration: Boltz-2 via Boltz CLI v2.2.0, 50 diffusion samples, seed 42, MSA server (Smorodina et al. 2026)Protocol: How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes
Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes
-0.04 pearson-correlation
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Boltz-2 on How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026)

structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-iptm-dockq-calibration

Aggregation: Not reported

Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P21, Boltz-2: change in ipTM against change in DockQ under saturation sampling
Configuration: Boltz-2 via Boltz CLI v2.2.0, 50 diffusion samples, seed 42, MSA server (Smorodina et al. 2026)Protocol: How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes
Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes
18% proportion
percent · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Boltz-2 on How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026)

structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-iptm-dockq-calibration

Aggregation: Not reported

Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P19, Boltz-2: share of predictions with ipTM at least 0.5 and DockQ below 0.23 (confident failures, Q2)
Configuration: Boltz-2 via Boltz CLI v2.2.0, 50 diffusion samples, seed 42, MSA server (Smorodina et al. 2026)Protocol: How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes
Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes
0.493 pearson-correlation
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Boltz-2 on How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026)

structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-iptm-dockq-calibration

Aggregation: Not reported

Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P19, Boltz-2: ipTM against DockQ for the first sample (sample0) of each complex
Configuration: Chai-1 0.6.1, 5 trunk x 10 diffusion samples, seed 42, ESM embeddings without MSAs (Smorodina et al. 2026)Protocol: How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes
Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes
0.612 pearson-correlation
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Chai-1 on How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026)

structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-iptm-dockq-calibration

Aggregation: Not reported

Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P19, Chai-1: ipTM against DockQ for the best-DockQ sample of each complex
Configuration: Chai-1 0.6.1, 5 trunk x 10 diffusion samples, seed 42, ESM embeddings without MSAs (Smorodina et al. 2026)Protocol: How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes
Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes
-0.019 pearson-correlation
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Chai-1 on How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026)

structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-iptm-dockq-calibration

Aggregation: Not reported

Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P21, Chai-1: change in ipTM against change in DockQ under saturation sampling
Configuration: Chai-1 0.6.1, 5 trunk x 10 diffusion samples, seed 42, ESM embeddings without MSAs (Smorodina et al. 2026)Protocol: How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes
Dataset: Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes
24% proportion
percent · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Chai-1 on How well ipTM tracks DockQ on cognate nanobody-antigen complexes (Smorodina et al. 2026)

structural-20261009-protocol-smorodina2026-vhh-iptm-dockq-calibration

Aggregation: Not reported

Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores · Results P19, Chai-1: share of predictions with ipTM below 0.5 and DockQ at least 0.23 (unconfident successes, Q4)

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc.

Dataset and evaluation context

A dataset supplies biological observations. The evaluation protocol defines how those observations are split, used and scored.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

7 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
attributes.population
106 VHH-antigen systems from 91 PDB entries; 15 entries hold two VHHs bound to different epitopes
Context-only references
Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores

Original source ↗

Methods, VHH-antigen dataset curation (P62 and following); Results P13; Methods P76

Version: bioRxiv version 1, posted 2026-03-03; Europe PMC preprint full text PPR1221387 (manuscript EMS215481); not peer reviewed
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T21:25:48Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.population

Source artifact SHA-256: 0ad24054d98fd1888fa8bf3120f76e22f7bf6b1965261b16f045986d72c50732

Hash scope: JATS XML parse (xml.etree), by extract/extract_structural.py

Inspected artifact

attributes.scope_note
Curated from SAbDab-nano (downloaded March 2025; post-October 2021 depositions) and from AACDB, whose pre-cutoff structures were kept on purpose to probe memorisation. Resolution 3.0 Å or better, VHH 110 to 150 residues, antigen 100 to 400 residues. Per-tool training overlap printed by the source: AF3 30 train and 76 test systems, Chai-1 25 and 81, Boltz-2 64 and 42.
Context-only references
Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores

Original source ↗

Methods, VHH-antigen dataset curation (P62 and following); Results P13; Methods P76

Version: bioRxiv version 1, posted 2026-03-03; Europe PMC preprint full text PPR1221387 (manuscript EMS215481); not peer reviewed
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T21:25:48Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.scope_note

Source artifact SHA-256: 0ad24054d98fd1888fa8bf3120f76e22f7bf6b1965261b16f045986d72c50732

Hash scope: JATS XML parse (xml.etree), by extract/extract_structural.py

Inspected artifact

attributes.source_locator
Methods, VHH-antigen dataset curation (P62 and following); Results P13; Methods P76
Context-only references
Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores

Original source ↗

Methods, VHH-antigen dataset curation (P62 and following); Results P13; Methods P76

Version: bioRxiv version 1, posted 2026-03-03; Europe PMC preprint full text PPR1221387 (manuscript EMS215481); not peer reviewed
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T21:25:48Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.source_locator

Source artifact SHA-256: 0ad24054d98fd1888fa8bf3120f76e22f7bf6b1965261b16f045986d72c50732

Hash scope: JATS XML parse (xml.etree), by extract/extract_structural.py

Inspected artifact

attributes.total
106
Context-only references
Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores

Original source ↗

Methods, VHH-antigen dataset curation (P62 and following); Results P13; Methods P76

Version: bioRxiv version 1, posted 2026-03-03; Europe PMC preprint full text PPR1221387 (manuscript EMS215481); not peer reviewed
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T21:25:48Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.total

Source artifact SHA-256: 0ad24054d98fd1888fa8bf3120f76e22f7bf6b1965261b16f045986d72c50732

Hash scope: JATS XML parse (xml.etree), by extract/extract_structural.py

Inspected artifact

attributes.version
bioRxiv v1 benchmark; Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.18390239
Context-only references
Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores

Original source ↗

Methods, VHH-antigen dataset curation (P62 and following); Results P13; Methods P76

Version: bioRxiv version 1, posted 2026-03-03; Europe PMC preprint full text PPR1221387 (manuscript EMS215481); not peer reviewed
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T21:25:48Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.version

Source artifact SHA-256: 0ad24054d98fd1888fa8bf3120f76e22f7bf6b1965261b16f045986d72c50732

Hash scope: JATS XML parse (xml.etree), by extract/extract_structural.py

Inspected artifact

description
Experimentally determined nanobody-antigen complexes, used as the real (cognate) systems.
Context-only references
Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores

Original source ↗

Methods, VHH-antigen dataset curation (P62 and following); Results P13; Methods P76

Version: bioRxiv version 1, posted 2026-03-03; Europe PMC preprint full text PPR1221387 (manuscript EMS215481); not peer reviewed
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T21:25:48Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: description

Source artifact SHA-256: 0ad24054d98fd1888fa8bf3120f76e22f7bf6b1965261b16f045986d72c50732

Hash scope: JATS XML parse (xml.etree), by extract/extract_structural.py

Inspected artifact

name
Smorodina et al. 2026 nanobody-antigen benchmark: 106 cognate VHH-antigen complexes
Context-only references
Structural Plausibility Without Binding Specificity: Limits of AI-Based Antibody-Antigen Structure Prediction Confidence Scores

Original source ↗

Methods, VHH-antigen dataset curation (P62 and following); Results P13; Methods P76

Version: bioRxiv version 1, posted 2026-03-03; Europe PMC preprint full text PPR1221387 (manuscript EMS215481); not peer reviewed
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T21:25:48Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: name

Source artifact SHA-256: 0ad24054d98fd1888fa8bf3120f76e22f7bf6b1965261b16f045986d72c50732

Hash scope: JATS XML parse (xml.etree), by extract/extract_structural.py

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: structural-20261009-data-smorodina2026-vhh-antigen-106

areas
proteins-complexes
contexts
research
version
bioRxiv v1 benchmark; Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.18390239
population
106 VHH-antigen systems from 91 PDB entries; 15 entries hold two VHHs bound to different epitopes
total
106
scope note
Curated from SAbDab-nano (downloaded March 2025; post-October 2021 depositions) and from AACDB, whose pre-cutoff structures were kept on purpose to probe memorisation. Resolution 3.0 Å or better, VHH 110 to 150 residues, antigen 100 to 400 residues. Per-tool training overlap printed by the source: AF3 30 train and 76 test systems, Chai-1 25 and 81, Boltz-2 64 and 42.
source locator
Methods, VHH-antigen dataset curation (P62 and following); Results P13; Methods P76
Related records

Suggest a correction