rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Dataset

Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)

Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants) as used by Fortier et al. 2026.

Evaluation results

4 evaluations · 16 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: CI-SpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants) (Fortier et al. Table 5)
Dataset: Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)
0.977 Balanced accuracy (maximum delta score > 0.5 (Legacy Ensemble N > 1))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CI-SpliceAI on the Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-barbosa-clinvar

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 5, row 'CI-SpliceAI', column 'Balanced Accuracy'
Configuration: CI-SpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants) (Fortier et al. Table 5)
Dataset: Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)
0.974 F1 (maximum delta score > 0.5 (Legacy Ensemble N > 1))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CI-SpliceAI on the Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-barbosa-clinvar

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 5, row 'CI-SpliceAI', column 'F1'
Configuration: CI-SpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants) (Fortier et al. Table 5)
Dataset: Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)
0.958 Recall (maximum delta score > 0.5 (Legacy Ensemble N > 1))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CI-SpliceAI on the Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-barbosa-clinvar

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 5, row 'CI-SpliceAI', column 'Sensitivity'
Configuration: CI-SpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants) (Fortier et al. Table 5)
Dataset: Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)
0.997 Specificity (maximum delta score > 0.5 (Legacy Ensemble N > 1))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CI-SpliceAI on the Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-barbosa-clinvar

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 5, row 'CI-SpliceAI', column 'Specificity'
Configuration: Legacy Ensemble (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants) (Fortier et al. Table 5)
Dataset: Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)
0.942 Balanced accuracy (maximum delta score > 0.5 (Legacy Ensemble N > 1))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Legacy Ensemble on the Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-barbosa-clinvar

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 5, row 'Legacy Ensemble', column 'Balanced Accuracy'
Configuration: Legacy Ensemble (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants) (Fortier et al. Table 5)
Dataset: Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)
0.902 F1 (maximum delta score > 0.5 (Legacy Ensemble N > 1))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Legacy Ensemble on the Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-barbosa-clinvar

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 5, row 'Legacy Ensemble', column 'F1'
Configuration: Legacy Ensemble (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants) (Fortier et al. Table 5)
Dataset: Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)
0.926 Recall (maximum delta score > 0.5 (Legacy Ensemble N > 1))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Legacy Ensemble on the Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-barbosa-clinvar

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 5, row 'Legacy Ensemble', column 'Sensitivity'
Configuration: Legacy Ensemble (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants) (Fortier et al. Table 5)
Dataset: Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)
0.959 Specificity (maximum delta score > 0.5 (Legacy Ensemble N > 1))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Legacy Ensemble on the Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-barbosa-clinvar

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 5, row 'Legacy Ensemble', column 'Specificity'
Configuration: OpenSpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants) (Fortier et al. Table 5)
Dataset: Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)
0.965 Balanced accuracy (maximum delta score > 0.5 (Legacy Ensemble N > 1))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenSpliceAI on the Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-barbosa-clinvar

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 5, row 'OpenSpliceAI', column 'Balanced Accuracy'
Configuration: OpenSpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants) (Fortier et al. Table 5)
Dataset: Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)
0.961 F1 (maximum delta score > 0.5 (Legacy Ensemble N > 1))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenSpliceAI on the Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-barbosa-clinvar

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 5, row 'OpenSpliceAI', column 'F1'
Configuration: OpenSpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants) (Fortier et al. Table 5)
Dataset: Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)
0.932 Recall (maximum delta score > 0.5 (Legacy Ensemble N > 1))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenSpliceAI on the Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-barbosa-clinvar

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 5, row 'OpenSpliceAI', column 'Sensitivity'
Configuration: OpenSpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants) (Fortier et al. Table 5)
Dataset: Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)
0.998 Specificity (maximum delta score > 0.5 (Legacy Ensemble N > 1))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

OpenSpliceAI on the Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-barbosa-clinvar

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 5, row 'OpenSpliceAI', column 'Specificity'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants) (Fortier et al. Table 5)
Dataset: Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)
0.973 Balanced accuracy (maximum delta score > 0.5 (Legacy Ensemble N > 1))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on the Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-barbosa-clinvar

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 5, row 'SpliceAI', column 'Balanced Accuracy'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants) (Fortier et al. Table 5)
Dataset: Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)
0.969 F1 (maximum delta score > 0.5 (Legacy Ensemble N > 1))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on the Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-barbosa-clinvar

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 5, row 'SpliceAI', column 'F1'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants) (Fortier et al. Table 5)
Dataset: Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)
0.948 Recall (maximum delta score > 0.5 (Legacy Ensemble N > 1))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on the Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-barbosa-clinvar

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 5, row 'SpliceAI', column 'Sensitivity'
Configuration: SpliceAI (Fortier et al. 2026)Protocol: Splice-altering variant classification, Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants) (Fortier et al. Table 5)
Dataset: Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)
0.997 Specificity (maximum delta score > 0.5 (Legacy Ensemble N > 1))
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

SpliceAI on the Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)

rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-protocol-barbosa-clinvar

Aggregation: Not reported

Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026) · Table 5, row 'SpliceAI', column 'Specificity'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.

Research readiness

0 of 4 readiness checks met. These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation; a source-checked score alone does not meet them.

Readiness checks, gaps and artifacts

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Evidence verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Replay metrics

Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • Metrics are recomputed from the saved predictions: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Investigate discrepancies

Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • Metrics are recomputed from the saved predictions: not yet verified
  • Sample annotations are recorded: not yet verified
  • Dependence between samples is assessed: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Run locally

A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • A pinned run recipe exists: not yet verified
  • Compute requirements are estimated: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Validate independently

Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • Independent validation data exist: not yet verified
  • Overlap with training data is checked: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.

Artifacts and reproduction

No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.

Dataset and evaluation context

A dataset supplies biological observations. The evaluation protocol defines how those observations are split, used and scored.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

6 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Population
53,600 GRCh37 intronic SNVs from ClinVar (release 2022-04) with at least one-star review; pathogenic or likely pathogenic as positive, benign or likely benign as negative; 22.8% alter canonical dinucleotides
Context-only references
Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026)

Original source ↗

Methods 'Barbosa ClinVar benchmark dataset'

Version: PLOS One 21(5):e0348885, published 2026-05-13; PMC13170886 full-text XML
Retrieved: 2026-10-11T21:37:04Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.population

Source artifact SHA-256: dffe74cee7782cbdfdbc9423cf00f0a846b3d720b90b10e9732d6f768c485176

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Source location
Methods 'Barbosa ClinVar benchmark dataset'
Context-only references
Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026)

Original source ↗

Methods 'Barbosa ClinVar benchmark dataset'

Version: PLOS One 21(5):e0348885, published 2026-05-13; PMC13170886 full-text XML
Retrieved: 2026-10-11T21:37:04Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.source_locator

Source artifact SHA-256: dffe74cee7782cbdfdbc9423cf00f0a846b3d720b90b10e9732d6f768c485176

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Split
No split; whole set scored
Context-only references
Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026)

Original source ↗

Methods 'Barbosa ClinVar benchmark dataset'

Version: PLOS One 21(5):e0348885, published 2026-05-13; PMC13170886 full-text XML
Retrieved: 2026-10-11T21:37:04Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.split

Source artifact SHA-256: dffe74cee7782cbdfdbc9423cf00f0a846b3d720b90b10e9732d6f768c485176

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Version
As assembled by Fortier et al. 2026 (Supporting Information S1 to S5 Files)
Context-only references
Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026)

Original source ↗

Methods 'Barbosa ClinVar benchmark dataset'

Version: PLOS One 21(5):e0348885, published 2026-05-13; PMC13170886 full-text XML
Retrieved: 2026-10-11T21:37:04Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.version

Source artifact SHA-256: dffe74cee7782cbdfdbc9423cf00f0a846b3d720b90b10e9732d6f768c485176

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Description
Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants) as used by Fortier et al. 2026.
Context-only references
Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026)

Original source ↗

Methods 'Barbosa ClinVar benchmark dataset'

Version: PLOS One 21(5):e0348885, published 2026-05-13; PMC13170886 full-text XML
Retrieved: 2026-10-11T21:37:04Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: description

Source artifact SHA-256: dffe74cee7782cbdfdbc9423cf00f0a846b3d720b90b10e9732d6f768c485176

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Name
Barbosa et al. ClinVar intronic SNV benchmark (53,600 variants)
Context-only references
Analyzing the performance of deep learning splice prediction algorithms (Fortier, Rudy and Scherer, PLOS One 2026)

Original source ↗

Methods 'Barbosa ClinVar benchmark dataset'

Version: PLOS One 21(5):e0348885, published 2026-05-13; PMC13170886 full-text XML
Retrieved: 2026-10-11T21:37:04Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: name

Source artifact SHA-256: dffe74cee7782cbdfdbc9423cf00f0a846b3d720b90b10e9732d6f768c485176

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: rna-splicing-20261011-fortier2026-data-barbosa-clinvar

areas
dna-genomes
contexts
clinical_research
version
As assembled by Fortier et al. 2026 (Supporting Information S1 to S5 Files)
population
53,600 GRCh37 intronic SNVs from ClinVar (release 2022-04) with at least one-star review; pathogenic or likely pathogenic as positive, benign or likely benign as negative; 22.8% alter canonical dinucleotides
split
No split; whole set scored
source locator
Methods 'Barbosa ClinVar benchmark dataset'
Related records

Suggest a correction