PoseBusters version 1, 428 protein-small molecule complexes; success rates taken from the literature by the LiPP authors.
3 evaluations · 3 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: AlphaFold 3 (LiPP evaluation) | Protocol: LiPP Table 2: lipid pose all-atom RMSD below 2 Angstrom, PoseBusters v1 Dataset: PoseBusters v1 (428 protein-small molecule complexes) | †76.4 {72.1–80.3}% Ligand RMSD under 2a rate (ligand pose RMSD below 2 Angstrom, as reported in the cited literature; PoseBusters v1) percent · higher Uncertainty: 95% CI 72.1 to 80.3. Exact binomial interval (table footnote a: 'lower and upper bounds of the 95% confidence intervals calculated with exact binomial distribution') Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Result quoted from another source · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceAlphaFold 3 on PoseBusters v1 (lipid pose all-atom RMSD below 2 Angstrom) lit-structure-20261011-lipp-protocol-rmsd-posebusters-v1-428 Aggregation: Not reported The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods · Table 2, row 'AlphaFold 3', column 'PoseBusters v1 (N = 428) % Success Rate' |
| Configuration: Chai-1 (LiPP evaluation) | Protocol: LiPP Table 2: lipid pose all-atom RMSD below 2 Angstrom, PoseBusters v1 Dataset: PoseBusters v1 (428 protein-small molecule complexes) | 77% Ligand RMSD under 2a rate (ligand pose RMSD below 2 Angstrom, as reported in the cited literature; PoseBusters v1) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Result quoted from another source · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceChai-1 on PoseBusters v1 (lipid pose all-atom RMSD below 2 Angstrom) lit-structure-20261011-lipp-protocol-rmsd-posebusters-v1-428 Aggregation: Not reported The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods · Table 2, row 'Chai-1', column 'PoseBusters v1 (N = 428) % Success Rate' |
| Configuration: RoseTTAFold AA (LiPP evaluation) | Protocol: LiPP Table 2: lipid pose all-atom RMSD below 2 Angstrom, PoseBusters v1 Dataset: PoseBusters v1 (428 protein-small molecule complexes) | 42% Ligand RMSD under 2a rate (ligand pose RMSD below 2 Angstrom, as reported in the cited literature; PoseBusters v1) percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Result quoted from another source · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceRoseTTAFold AA on PoseBusters v1 (lipid pose all-atom RMSD below 2 Angstrom) lit-structure-20261011-lipp-protocol-rmsd-posebusters-v1-428 Aggregation: Not reported The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods · Table 2, row 'RoseTTAFold AA', column 'PoseBusters v1 (N = 428) % Success Rate' |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.
0 of 4 readiness checks met. These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation; a source-checked score alone does not meet them.
Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Evidence verified: Not verified
Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.
No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.
A dataset supplies biological observations. The evaluation protocol defines how those observations are split, used and scored.
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
6 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Population 428 complexes (PoseBusters v1) Context-only references | The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods Tables 2 and 3 column headings; Table 3 footnote a ('N denotes the total number of complexes in each dataset') Version: PMC13292216.1 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| Source location Tables 2 and 3 column headings; Table 3 footnote a ('N denotes the total number of complexes in each dataset') Context-only references | The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods Tables 2 and 3 column headings; Table 3 footnote a ('N denotes the total number of complexes in each dataset') Version: PMC13292216.1 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| Split PoseBusters v1 Context-only references | The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods Tables 2 and 3 column headings; Table 3 footnote a ('N denotes the total number of complexes in each dataset') Version: PMC13292216.1 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| Total 428 Context-only references | The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods Tables 2 and 3 column headings; Table 3 footnote a ('N denotes the total number of complexes in each dataset') Version: PMC13292216.1 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| Description PoseBusters version 1, 428 protein-small molecule complexes; success rates taken from the literature by the LiPP authors. Context-only references | The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods Tables 2 and 3 column headings; Table 3 footnote a ('N denotes the total number of complexes in each dataset') Version: PMC13292216.1 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| Name PoseBusters v1 (428 protein-small molecule complexes) Context-only references | The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods Tables 2 and 3 column headings; Table 3 footnote a ('N denotes the total number of complexes in each dataset') Version: PMC13292216.1 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked
Stable ID: lit-structure-20261011-lipp-data-posebusters-v1-428