| Access Supplementary file 5; hit lists from https://lsd.docking.org/ Context-only references | Kim, Correy, Hall et al. 2026, eLife 15:RP110475 (Europe PMC full text) Original source ↗ Results 'Co-folding struggles to reliably re-rank docking hit lists'; Methods 'Benchmarking co-folding on experimentally validated compounds' Version: PMC13657626 (eLife 2026;15:RP110475, version of record published 2026-10-12) Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:52:32Z | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: attributes.access Source artifact SHA-256: 9be510b7b0cc152ff56a03c96877bf06b6a6bdeffdb4baecf8e999a6bf155aa6 Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
|---|
| Assay Radioligand displacement of [3H]N-methylspiperone, single concentration at 10 uM Context-only references | Kim, Correy, Hall et al. 2026, eLife 15:RP110475 (Europe PMC full text) Original source ↗ Results 'Co-folding struggles to reliably re-rank docking hit lists'; Methods 'Benchmarking co-folding on experimentally validated compounds' Version: PMC13657626 (eLife 2026;15:RP110475, version of record published 2026-10-12) Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:52:32Z | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: attributes.assay Source artifact SHA-256: 9be510b7b0cc152ff56a03c96877bf06b6a6bdeffdb4baecf8e999a6bf155aa6 Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
|---|
| Label semantics True hit: apparent Ki below 7.8 uM, from 25% displacement of [3H]N-methylspiperone measured at 10 uM and converted with the Cheng-Prusoff equation. The rest are non-binders, which are high-ranking docking false positives rather than property-matched decoys. Context-only references | Kim, Correy, Hall et al. 2026, eLife 15:RP110475 (Europe PMC full text) Original source ↗ Results 'Co-folding struggles to reliably re-rank docking hit lists'; Methods 'Benchmarking co-folding on experimentally validated compounds' Version: PMC13657626 (eLife 2026;15:RP110475, version of record published 2026-10-12) Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:52:32Z | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: attributes.label_semantics Source artifact SHA-256: 9be510b7b0cc152ff56a03c96877bf06b6a6bdeffdb4baecf8e999a6bf155aa6 Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
|---|
| Negatives 336 Context-only references | Kim, Correy, Hall et al. 2026, eLife 15:RP110475 (Europe PMC full text) Original source ↗ Results 'Co-folding struggles to reliably re-rank docking hit lists'; Methods 'Benchmarking co-folding on experimentally validated compounds' Version: PMC13657626 (eLife 2026;15:RP110475, version of record published 2026-10-12) Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:52:32Z | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: attributes.negatives Source artifact SHA-256: 9be510b7b0cc152ff56a03c96877bf06b6a6bdeffdb4baecf8e999a6bf155aa6 Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
|---|
| Population 541 tested compounds from a 138-million molecule screen: 205 true hits and 336 non-binders Context-only references | Kim, Correy, Hall et al. 2026, eLife 15:RP110475 (Europe PMC full text) Original source ↗ Results 'Co-folding struggles to reliably re-rank docking hit lists'; Methods 'Benchmarking co-folding on experimentally validated compounds' Version: PMC13657626 (eLife 2026;15:RP110475, version of record published 2026-10-12) Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:52:32Z | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: attributes.population Source artifact SHA-256: 9be510b7b0cc152ff56a03c96877bf06b6a6bdeffdb4baecf8e999a6bf155aa6 Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
|---|
| Positives 205 Context-only references | Kim, Correy, Hall et al. 2026, eLife 15:RP110475 (Europe PMC full text) Original source ↗ Results 'Co-folding struggles to reliably re-rank docking hit lists'; Methods 'Benchmarking co-folding on experimentally validated compounds' Version: PMC13657626 (eLife 2026;15:RP110475, version of record published 2026-10-12) Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:52:32Z | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: attributes.positives Source artifact SHA-256: 9be510b7b0cc152ff56a03c96877bf06b6a6bdeffdb4baecf8e999a6bf155aa6 Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
|---|
| Source location Results 'Co-folding struggles to reliably re-rank docking hit lists'; Methods 'Benchmarking co-folding on experimentally validated compounds' Context-only references | Kim, Correy, Hall et al. 2026, eLife 15:RP110475 (Europe PMC full text) Original source ↗ Results 'Co-folding struggles to reliably re-rank docking hit lists'; Methods 'Benchmarking co-folding on experimentally validated compounds' Version: PMC13657626 (eLife 2026;15:RP110475, version of record published 2026-10-12) Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:52:32Z | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: attributes.source_locator Source artifact SHA-256: 9be510b7b0cc152ff56a03c96877bf06b6a6bdeffdb4baecf8e999a6bf155aa6 Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
|---|
| Split Whole tested set; no training or test split applies Context-only references | Kim, Correy, Hall et al. 2026, eLife 15:RP110475 (Europe PMC full text) Original source ↗ Results 'Co-folding struggles to reliably re-rank docking hit lists'; Methods 'Benchmarking co-folding on experimentally validated compounds' Version: PMC13657626 (eLife 2026;15:RP110475, version of record published 2026-10-12) Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:52:32Z | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: attributes.split Source artifact SHA-256: 9be510b7b0cc152ff56a03c96877bf06b6a6bdeffdb4baecf8e999a6bf155aa6 Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
|---|
| Total 541 Context-only references | Kim, Correy, Hall et al. 2026, eLife 15:RP110475 (Europe PMC full text) Original source ↗ Results 'Co-folding struggles to reliably re-rank docking hit lists'; Methods 'Benchmarking co-folding on experimentally validated compounds' Version: PMC13657626 (eLife 2026;15:RP110475, version of record published 2026-10-12) Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:52:32Z | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: attributes.total Source artifact SHA-256: 9be510b7b0cc152ff56a03c96877bf06b6a6bdeffdb4baecf8e999a6bf155aa6 Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
|---|
| Version Compounds and measured potencies as provided in Supplementary file 5; the hit lists are available from https://lsd.docking.org/ Context-only references | Kim, Correy, Hall et al. 2026, eLife 15:RP110475 (Europe PMC full text) Original source ↗ Results 'Co-folding struggles to reliably re-rank docking hit lists'; Methods 'Benchmarking co-folding on experimentally validated compounds' Version: PMC13657626 (eLife 2026;15:RP110475, version of record published 2026-10-12) Retrieved: 2026-10-22T11:52:32Z | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: attributes.version Source artifact SHA-256: 9be510b7b0cc152ff56a03c96877bf06b6a6bdeffdb4baecf8e999a6bf155aa6 Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
|---|